Internal and external influences on role stereotype adherence and gender dynamics on engineering design teams

Abstract Background Even among women who persist in the gender-imbalanced engineering fields, women on engineering design teams tend to take on non-technical roles. Understanding the mechanisms that inform this phenomenon is important for encouraging more women in STEM in order to close the gender g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anastasia M. Schauer, Jessie Liu, Christopher Saldaña, Katherine Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-01-01
Series:International Journal of STEM Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00528-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594394061996032
author Anastasia M. Schauer
Jessie Liu
Christopher Saldaña
Katherine Fu
author_facet Anastasia M. Schauer
Jessie Liu
Christopher Saldaña
Katherine Fu
author_sort Anastasia M. Schauer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Even among women who persist in the gender-imbalanced engineering fields, women on engineering design teams tend to take on non-technical roles. Understanding the mechanisms that inform this phenomenon is important for encouraging more women in STEM in order to close the gender gap. Although factors such as self-efficacy, task allocation, and occupational prestige have previously been examined through a gender-based lens, this study considers all of these factors together in order to better understand the role of internal and external effects on role stereotype adherence in engineering design teams. A survey was administered to computer science and engineering students in the United States presenting a scenario in which they are members of an engineering design team. Participants reported their interest, self-efficacy, and anticipated contribution to the project. All participants were then assigned a documentation role by a teammate and asked the same questions again after a brief reflection. Results While all participants exhibited higher interest in a more socially impactful project, participants’ interest in the project decreased significantly after they were assigned the non-technical, feminine-stereotyped role of documentation. Women reported significantly higher experience, interest, and self-efficacy levels in documentation compared to men. After being assigned the documentation role, men anticipated that their contribution to the project would be significantly lower compared to women, indicating a decrease in interest or a devaluation of their role on the team. Perceived sexism may have also played a part in how women reacted to role allocation, as it is hypothesized that reactance theory led women’s interest in a mechanical design role to increase post-role allocation. Conclusions These results support existing literature related to the likelihood of (1) women taking on non-technical roles on engineering teams and (2) society devaluing work that is stereotypically associated with feminine stereotypes. Participants’ reactions to role allocation were most closely related to internal factors, such as self-efficacy and the implicit devaluation of femininity. Findings can be used to inform curriculum development in hands-on design project courses and management of design groups in industry.
format Article
id doaj-art-3038e8ad86b845ffa9c9d356b2a55c32
institution Kabale University
issn 2196-7822
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series International Journal of STEM Education
spelling doaj-art-3038e8ad86b845ffa9c9d356b2a55c322025-01-19T12:37:54ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of STEM Education2196-78222025-01-0112111910.1186/s40594-025-00528-4Internal and external influences on role stereotype adherence and gender dynamics on engineering design teamsAnastasia M. Schauer0Jessie Liu1Christopher Saldaña2Katherine Fu3Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at AustinGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of TechnologyGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Building Room 2055, University of Wisconsin-MadisonAbstract Background Even among women who persist in the gender-imbalanced engineering fields, women on engineering design teams tend to take on non-technical roles. Understanding the mechanisms that inform this phenomenon is important for encouraging more women in STEM in order to close the gender gap. Although factors such as self-efficacy, task allocation, and occupational prestige have previously been examined through a gender-based lens, this study considers all of these factors together in order to better understand the role of internal and external effects on role stereotype adherence in engineering design teams. A survey was administered to computer science and engineering students in the United States presenting a scenario in which they are members of an engineering design team. Participants reported their interest, self-efficacy, and anticipated contribution to the project. All participants were then assigned a documentation role by a teammate and asked the same questions again after a brief reflection. Results While all participants exhibited higher interest in a more socially impactful project, participants’ interest in the project decreased significantly after they were assigned the non-technical, feminine-stereotyped role of documentation. Women reported significantly higher experience, interest, and self-efficacy levels in documentation compared to men. After being assigned the documentation role, men anticipated that their contribution to the project would be significantly lower compared to women, indicating a decrease in interest or a devaluation of their role on the team. Perceived sexism may have also played a part in how women reacted to role allocation, as it is hypothesized that reactance theory led women’s interest in a mechanical design role to increase post-role allocation. Conclusions These results support existing literature related to the likelihood of (1) women taking on non-technical roles on engineering teams and (2) society devaluing work that is stereotypically associated with feminine stereotypes. Participants’ reactions to role allocation were most closely related to internal factors, such as self-efficacy and the implicit devaluation of femininity. Findings can be used to inform curriculum development in hands-on design project courses and management of design groups in industry.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00528-4Engineering educationProject-based learningGender stereotypingTeam dynamicsTask allocationSelf-efficacy
spellingShingle Anastasia M. Schauer
Jessie Liu
Christopher Saldaña
Katherine Fu
Internal and external influences on role stereotype adherence and gender dynamics on engineering design teams
International Journal of STEM Education
Engineering education
Project-based learning
Gender stereotyping
Team dynamics
Task allocation
Self-efficacy
title Internal and external influences on role stereotype adherence and gender dynamics on engineering design teams
title_full Internal and external influences on role stereotype adherence and gender dynamics on engineering design teams
title_fullStr Internal and external influences on role stereotype adherence and gender dynamics on engineering design teams
title_full_unstemmed Internal and external influences on role stereotype adherence and gender dynamics on engineering design teams
title_short Internal and external influences on role stereotype adherence and gender dynamics on engineering design teams
title_sort internal and external influences on role stereotype adherence and gender dynamics on engineering design teams
topic Engineering education
Project-based learning
Gender stereotyping
Team dynamics
Task allocation
Self-efficacy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00528-4
work_keys_str_mv AT anastasiamschauer internalandexternalinfluencesonrolestereotypeadherenceandgenderdynamicsonengineeringdesignteams
AT jessieliu internalandexternalinfluencesonrolestereotypeadherenceandgenderdynamicsonengineeringdesignteams
AT christophersaldana internalandexternalinfluencesonrolestereotypeadherenceandgenderdynamicsonengineeringdesignteams
AT katherinefu internalandexternalinfluencesonrolestereotypeadherenceandgenderdynamicsonengineeringdesignteams