The questions on violence (FOV) tool for interpersonal violence inquiry in Swedish healthcare settings – evaluation of content validity, face validity and test-retest reliability
Abstract Background Previous research indicates that routine inquiry or screening conducted by healthcare providers may significantly increase the identification of interpersonal violence. There is a lack of comprehensive instruments to routinely assess patients about interpersonal violence and viol...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2024-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11708-3 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832571846166315008 |
---|---|
author | Solveig Lövestad Karin Sjöström Josefin Björk Karin Örmon |
author_facet | Solveig Lövestad Karin Sjöström Josefin Björk Karin Örmon |
author_sort | Solveig Lövestad |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Previous research indicates that routine inquiry or screening conducted by healthcare providers may significantly increase the identification of interpersonal violence. There is a lack of comprehensive instruments to routinely assess patients about interpersonal violence and violence against children in the household. The purpose of this study was to assess the content validity, face validity and reliability of the Questions on Violence (FOV) tool, an instrument specifically designed for routine inquiries about interpersonal violence in healthcare settings within the Swedish context. Methods The content validity, face validity and reliability of the FOV instrument was assessed through (1) a content validity index with six experts in the field of intimate partner violence, (2) cognitive interviews with nine patients recruited from a primary healthcare facility, and (3) an evaluation of the test-retest reliability based on responses from 37(50.0%) university students. The intraclass correlation coefficient, model 2.1, was calculated to assess the degree of correlation and agreement between the two measurements. Results Calculations based on the content validity index indicated that five out of seven items had excellent content validity (≥ 0.78). The average content validity index of included items was 0.88, which is slightly below the recommended threshold for excellent content validity. The results based on the cognitive interviews revealed that participants found the seven items to be relevant and easy to understand. Overall, the participants agreed that the concept of ‘close relationships’ primarily encompassed intimate partners, family members, and close friends. The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85 (0.77–0.91; CI 95%), indicating good reliability with an interval of good to excellent test-retest reliability. Conclusions The results demonstrate that the seven-item FOV instrument has good content and face validity as well as good to excellent test-retest reliability. The current study provides healthcare professionals with a short yet comprehensive instrument for identifying patients who have experienced or perpetrated different forms of interpersonal violence. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-2fef03ada8a3464b9019b3c2ca2312cc |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1472-6963 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-10-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Health Services Research |
spelling | doaj-art-2fef03ada8a3464b9019b3c2ca2312cc2025-02-02T12:14:38ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632024-10-0124111310.1186/s12913-024-11708-3The questions on violence (FOV) tool for interpersonal violence inquiry in Swedish healthcare settings – evaluation of content validity, face validity and test-retest reliabilitySolveig Lövestad0Karin Sjöström1Josefin Björk2Karin Örmon3Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of GothenburgDepartment of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö UniversityThe Västra Götaland Region Competence Centre on Intimate Partner Violence (VKV)The Västra Götaland Region Competence Centre on Intimate Partner Violence (VKV)Abstract Background Previous research indicates that routine inquiry or screening conducted by healthcare providers may significantly increase the identification of interpersonal violence. There is a lack of comprehensive instruments to routinely assess patients about interpersonal violence and violence against children in the household. The purpose of this study was to assess the content validity, face validity and reliability of the Questions on Violence (FOV) tool, an instrument specifically designed for routine inquiries about interpersonal violence in healthcare settings within the Swedish context. Methods The content validity, face validity and reliability of the FOV instrument was assessed through (1) a content validity index with six experts in the field of intimate partner violence, (2) cognitive interviews with nine patients recruited from a primary healthcare facility, and (3) an evaluation of the test-retest reliability based on responses from 37(50.0%) university students. The intraclass correlation coefficient, model 2.1, was calculated to assess the degree of correlation and agreement between the two measurements. Results Calculations based on the content validity index indicated that five out of seven items had excellent content validity (≥ 0.78). The average content validity index of included items was 0.88, which is slightly below the recommended threshold for excellent content validity. The results based on the cognitive interviews revealed that participants found the seven items to be relevant and easy to understand. Overall, the participants agreed that the concept of ‘close relationships’ primarily encompassed intimate partners, family members, and close friends. The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85 (0.77–0.91; CI 95%), indicating good reliability with an interval of good to excellent test-retest reliability. Conclusions The results demonstrate that the seven-item FOV instrument has good content and face validity as well as good to excellent test-retest reliability. The current study provides healthcare professionals with a short yet comprehensive instrument for identifying patients who have experienced or perpetrated different forms of interpersonal violence.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11708-3ReliabilityValidityInstrumentRoutine inquiryHealth careViolence |
spellingShingle | Solveig Lövestad Karin Sjöström Josefin Björk Karin Örmon The questions on violence (FOV) tool for interpersonal violence inquiry in Swedish healthcare settings – evaluation of content validity, face validity and test-retest reliability BMC Health Services Research Reliability Validity Instrument Routine inquiry Health care Violence |
title | The questions on violence (FOV) tool for interpersonal violence inquiry in Swedish healthcare settings – evaluation of content validity, face validity and test-retest reliability |
title_full | The questions on violence (FOV) tool for interpersonal violence inquiry in Swedish healthcare settings – evaluation of content validity, face validity and test-retest reliability |
title_fullStr | The questions on violence (FOV) tool for interpersonal violence inquiry in Swedish healthcare settings – evaluation of content validity, face validity and test-retest reliability |
title_full_unstemmed | The questions on violence (FOV) tool for interpersonal violence inquiry in Swedish healthcare settings – evaluation of content validity, face validity and test-retest reliability |
title_short | The questions on violence (FOV) tool for interpersonal violence inquiry in Swedish healthcare settings – evaluation of content validity, face validity and test-retest reliability |
title_sort | questions on violence fov tool for interpersonal violence inquiry in swedish healthcare settings evaluation of content validity face validity and test retest reliability |
topic | Reliability Validity Instrument Routine inquiry Health care Violence |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11708-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT solveiglovestad thequestionsonviolencefovtoolforinterpersonalviolenceinquiryinswedishhealthcaresettingsevaluationofcontentvalidityfacevalidityandtestretestreliability AT karinsjostrom thequestionsonviolencefovtoolforinterpersonalviolenceinquiryinswedishhealthcaresettingsevaluationofcontentvalidityfacevalidityandtestretestreliability AT josefinbjork thequestionsonviolencefovtoolforinterpersonalviolenceinquiryinswedishhealthcaresettingsevaluationofcontentvalidityfacevalidityandtestretestreliability AT karinormon thequestionsonviolencefovtoolforinterpersonalviolenceinquiryinswedishhealthcaresettingsevaluationofcontentvalidityfacevalidityandtestretestreliability AT solveiglovestad questionsonviolencefovtoolforinterpersonalviolenceinquiryinswedishhealthcaresettingsevaluationofcontentvalidityfacevalidityandtestretestreliability AT karinsjostrom questionsonviolencefovtoolforinterpersonalviolenceinquiryinswedishhealthcaresettingsevaluationofcontentvalidityfacevalidityandtestretestreliability AT josefinbjork questionsonviolencefovtoolforinterpersonalviolenceinquiryinswedishhealthcaresettingsevaluationofcontentvalidityfacevalidityandtestretestreliability AT karinormon questionsonviolencefovtoolforinterpersonalviolenceinquiryinswedishhealthcaresettingsevaluationofcontentvalidityfacevalidityandtestretestreliability |