Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation across rehabilitation populations: A scoping review.
<h4>Objective</h4>This scoping review aimed to map existing research on adverse events encountered during telerehabilitation delivery, across rehabilitation populations. This includes identifying characteristics of adverse events (frequency/physical/non-physical, relatedness, severity) a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313440&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832540098752675840 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas Yau Josh Chan McKyla McIntyre Damanveer Bhogal Angie Andreoli Carl Froilan D Leochico Mark Bayley Ailene Kua Meiqi Guo Sarah Munce |
| author_facet | Thomas Yau Josh Chan McKyla McIntyre Damanveer Bhogal Angie Andreoli Carl Froilan D Leochico Mark Bayley Ailene Kua Meiqi Guo Sarah Munce |
| author_sort | Thomas Yau |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Objective</h4>This scoping review aimed to map existing research on adverse events encountered during telerehabilitation delivery, across rehabilitation populations. This includes identifying characteristics of adverse events (frequency/physical/non-physical, relatedness, severity) and examining adverse events by different modes of telerehabilitation delivery and disease states.<h4>Introduction</h4>Telerehabilitation, a subset of telemedicine, has gained traction during the COVID-19 pandemic for remote service delivery. However, no prior scoping review, systematic review, or meta-analysis has identified and summarized the current primary research on adverse events in telerehabilitation. Understanding adverse events, such as falls during physiotherapy or aspiration pneumonia during speech therapy, is crucial for identifying limitations and optimizing delivery through risk mitigation and quality indicators. This understanding could also help to improve the uptake of telerehabilitation among clinicians and patients. This review addresses this gap by summarizing published literature on adverse events during telerehabilitation.<h4>Methods</h4>The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The review protocol was registered and published on Open Science Framework. A comprehensive search across multiple databases (MEDLINE ALL/EMBASE/APA PsycINFO/CENTRAL/CINAHL) was conducted. Screening, extraction, and synthesis were performed in duplicate and independently. Data extraction followed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication framework and also involved extraction on authors, publication year (pre- or post-COVID), population, sample size, and modes of telerehabilitation delivery (asynchronous, synchronous, hybrid). For synthesis, data were summarized quantitatively using numerical counts and qualitatively via content analysis. The data were grouped by intervention type and by type of adverse event.<h4>Inclusion criteria</h4>This scoping review included qualitative and quantitative studies published between 2013-2023, written in English, and conducted in any geographic area. All modes of telerehabilitation delivery were included. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries, protocols, opinion pieces, conference abstracts, and case series with fewer than five participants were excluded.<h4>Results</h4>The search identified 11,863 references, and 81 studies were included in this review with a total of 3,057 participants (mean age:59.3 years; females:44.6%). Modes of telerehabilitation delivery (whether asynchronous, synchronous or hybrid) used in the studies included videoconferencing (52), phone calls (25), text messaging (4), email (6), mobile apps (10), and internet-based virtual reality systems (3). A total of 295 adverse events occurred during 84,534 sessions (0.3%), with the majority being physical (e.g., falls or musculoskeletal pain), non-serious/non-severe/mild, and unrelated to (i.e., not caused by) to the telerehabilitation provided.<h4>Conclusions</h4>From the 81 included studies, telerehabilitation was delivered with related adverse events being rare, and mostly characterized as mild/non-severe. A comparable occurrence of adverse events (~30%) was found between asynchronous and synchronous telerehabilitation studies. When categorized by disease type, cardiac telerehabilitation studies had the most frequent adverse events. Detailed reporting of telerehabilitation interventions and adverse event characteristics is recommended for future studies (i.e., use of TIDieR reporting guidelines). Telerehabilitation has the potential to make rehabilitation services more accessible to patients; however, more evidence on the safety of telerehabilitation is needed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2feeaaf2f0a44392bbc9de20a09bb152 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-2feeaaf2f0a44392bbc9de20a09bb1522025-02-05T05:32:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-011911e031344010.1371/journal.pone.0313440Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation across rehabilitation populations: A scoping review.Thomas YauJosh ChanMcKyla McIntyreDamanveer BhogalAngie AndreoliCarl Froilan D LeochicoMark BayleyAilene KuaMeiqi GuoSarah Munce<h4>Objective</h4>This scoping review aimed to map existing research on adverse events encountered during telerehabilitation delivery, across rehabilitation populations. This includes identifying characteristics of adverse events (frequency/physical/non-physical, relatedness, severity) and examining adverse events by different modes of telerehabilitation delivery and disease states.<h4>Introduction</h4>Telerehabilitation, a subset of telemedicine, has gained traction during the COVID-19 pandemic for remote service delivery. However, no prior scoping review, systematic review, or meta-analysis has identified and summarized the current primary research on adverse events in telerehabilitation. Understanding adverse events, such as falls during physiotherapy or aspiration pneumonia during speech therapy, is crucial for identifying limitations and optimizing delivery through risk mitigation and quality indicators. This understanding could also help to improve the uptake of telerehabilitation among clinicians and patients. This review addresses this gap by summarizing published literature on adverse events during telerehabilitation.<h4>Methods</h4>The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The review protocol was registered and published on Open Science Framework. A comprehensive search across multiple databases (MEDLINE ALL/EMBASE/APA PsycINFO/CENTRAL/CINAHL) was conducted. Screening, extraction, and synthesis were performed in duplicate and independently. Data extraction followed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication framework and also involved extraction on authors, publication year (pre- or post-COVID), population, sample size, and modes of telerehabilitation delivery (asynchronous, synchronous, hybrid). For synthesis, data were summarized quantitatively using numerical counts and qualitatively via content analysis. The data were grouped by intervention type and by type of adverse event.<h4>Inclusion criteria</h4>This scoping review included qualitative and quantitative studies published between 2013-2023, written in English, and conducted in any geographic area. All modes of telerehabilitation delivery were included. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries, protocols, opinion pieces, conference abstracts, and case series with fewer than five participants were excluded.<h4>Results</h4>The search identified 11,863 references, and 81 studies were included in this review with a total of 3,057 participants (mean age:59.3 years; females:44.6%). Modes of telerehabilitation delivery (whether asynchronous, synchronous or hybrid) used in the studies included videoconferencing (52), phone calls (25), text messaging (4), email (6), mobile apps (10), and internet-based virtual reality systems (3). A total of 295 adverse events occurred during 84,534 sessions (0.3%), with the majority being physical (e.g., falls or musculoskeletal pain), non-serious/non-severe/mild, and unrelated to (i.e., not caused by) to the telerehabilitation provided.<h4>Conclusions</h4>From the 81 included studies, telerehabilitation was delivered with related adverse events being rare, and mostly characterized as mild/non-severe. A comparable occurrence of adverse events (~30%) was found between asynchronous and synchronous telerehabilitation studies. When categorized by disease type, cardiac telerehabilitation studies had the most frequent adverse events. Detailed reporting of telerehabilitation interventions and adverse event characteristics is recommended for future studies (i.e., use of TIDieR reporting guidelines). Telerehabilitation has the potential to make rehabilitation services more accessible to patients; however, more evidence on the safety of telerehabilitation is needed.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313440&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Thomas Yau Josh Chan McKyla McIntyre Damanveer Bhogal Angie Andreoli Carl Froilan D Leochico Mark Bayley Ailene Kua Meiqi Guo Sarah Munce Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation across rehabilitation populations: A scoping review. PLoS ONE |
| title | Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation across rehabilitation populations: A scoping review. |
| title_full | Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation across rehabilitation populations: A scoping review. |
| title_fullStr | Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation across rehabilitation populations: A scoping review. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation across rehabilitation populations: A scoping review. |
| title_short | Adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation across rehabilitation populations: A scoping review. |
| title_sort | adverse events associated with the delivery of telerehabilitation across rehabilitation populations a scoping review |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313440&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasyau adverseeventsassociatedwiththedeliveryoftelerehabilitationacrossrehabilitationpopulationsascopingreview AT joshchan adverseeventsassociatedwiththedeliveryoftelerehabilitationacrossrehabilitationpopulationsascopingreview AT mckylamcintyre adverseeventsassociatedwiththedeliveryoftelerehabilitationacrossrehabilitationpopulationsascopingreview AT damanveerbhogal adverseeventsassociatedwiththedeliveryoftelerehabilitationacrossrehabilitationpopulationsascopingreview AT angieandreoli adverseeventsassociatedwiththedeliveryoftelerehabilitationacrossrehabilitationpopulationsascopingreview AT carlfroilandleochico adverseeventsassociatedwiththedeliveryoftelerehabilitationacrossrehabilitationpopulationsascopingreview AT markbayley adverseeventsassociatedwiththedeliveryoftelerehabilitationacrossrehabilitationpopulationsascopingreview AT ailenekua adverseeventsassociatedwiththedeliveryoftelerehabilitationacrossrehabilitationpopulationsascopingreview AT meiqiguo adverseeventsassociatedwiththedeliveryoftelerehabilitationacrossrehabilitationpopulationsascopingreview AT sarahmunce adverseeventsassociatedwiththedeliveryoftelerehabilitationacrossrehabilitationpopulationsascopingreview |