Infrastructural Critique. The Upside-Down of the Bottom-Up: A Case Study on the IBA Berlin 84/87
Participation in planning is a logical consequence of the democratisation of society due to the social and cultural changes related to modernism. Anarchistic participation, as in Autogestion, within a development process, is a critical utopian alternative draft to existing power structures. The part...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
TU Delft OPEN Publishing
2013-06-01
|
Series: | Footprint |
Online Access: | https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/773 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832560856154505216 |
---|---|
author | Eva Maria Hierzer Philipp Markus Schörkhuber |
author_facet | Eva Maria Hierzer Philipp Markus Schörkhuber |
author_sort | Eva Maria Hierzer |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Participation in planning is a logical consequence of the democratisation of society due to the social and cultural changes related to modernism. Anarchistic participation, as in Autogestion, within a development process, is a critical utopian alternative draft to existing power structures. The participatory turn represented by the International Building Exhibition Berlin 1987 (IBA) meant the institutionalisation of these utopian ideas, resulting in a heterotopian notion of participation instrumentalised by governing and economic forces.
The most important aspect to our argument is that participation is a matter of critique – with critique as the very core of the modern understanding of progress – and thus enabling forms of improvement in planning, regulating and governing with architectural and urbanistic means. Those means simply embody a specific form of resisting critique and certain shifts in the structures of governing revealing an infrastructural critique which both re-forms the elements and the relations of what is to be resisted. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-2fe44a63bc1f4021b7a3408d3eb66ca9 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1875-1504 1875-1490 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013-06-01 |
publisher | TU Delft OPEN Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Footprint |
spelling | doaj-art-2fe44a63bc1f4021b7a3408d3eb66ca92025-02-03T01:26:35ZengTU Delft OPEN PublishingFootprint1875-15041875-14902013-06-017210.7480/footprint.7.2.773798Infrastructural Critique. The Upside-Down of the Bottom-Up: A Case Study on the IBA Berlin 84/87Eva Maria HierzerPhilipp Markus SchörkhuberParticipation in planning is a logical consequence of the democratisation of society due to the social and cultural changes related to modernism. Anarchistic participation, as in Autogestion, within a development process, is a critical utopian alternative draft to existing power structures. The participatory turn represented by the International Building Exhibition Berlin 1987 (IBA) meant the institutionalisation of these utopian ideas, resulting in a heterotopian notion of participation instrumentalised by governing and economic forces. The most important aspect to our argument is that participation is a matter of critique – with critique as the very core of the modern understanding of progress – and thus enabling forms of improvement in planning, regulating and governing with architectural and urbanistic means. Those means simply embody a specific form of resisting critique and certain shifts in the structures of governing revealing an infrastructural critique which both re-forms the elements and the relations of what is to be resisted.https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/773 |
spellingShingle | Eva Maria Hierzer Philipp Markus Schörkhuber Infrastructural Critique. The Upside-Down of the Bottom-Up: A Case Study on the IBA Berlin 84/87 Footprint |
title | Infrastructural Critique. The Upside-Down of the Bottom-Up: A Case Study on the IBA Berlin 84/87 |
title_full | Infrastructural Critique. The Upside-Down of the Bottom-Up: A Case Study on the IBA Berlin 84/87 |
title_fullStr | Infrastructural Critique. The Upside-Down of the Bottom-Up: A Case Study on the IBA Berlin 84/87 |
title_full_unstemmed | Infrastructural Critique. The Upside-Down of the Bottom-Up: A Case Study on the IBA Berlin 84/87 |
title_short | Infrastructural Critique. The Upside-Down of the Bottom-Up: A Case Study on the IBA Berlin 84/87 |
title_sort | infrastructural critique the upside down of the bottom up a case study on the iba berlin 84 87 |
url | https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/773 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evamariahierzer infrastructuralcritiquetheupsidedownofthebottomupacasestudyontheibaberlin8487 AT philippmarkusschorkhuber infrastructuralcritiquetheupsidedownofthebottomupacasestudyontheibaberlin8487 |