Comparative characteristics of power delivery and temperature between conventional and hybrid energy storage systems in UAVs
This research endeavors to present an analysis the characteristics of the power delivery and temperature between conventional energy storage systems (CESS) and hybrid energy storage systems (HESS) to aid in the development of advanced energy storage solutions for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
EDP Sciences
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
| Online Access: | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/10/e3sconf_ri2c2025_01006.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832098395595997184 |
|---|---|
| author | Phumma Prasophchok Saikong Waiard |
| author_facet | Phumma Prasophchok Saikong Waiard |
| author_sort | Phumma Prasophchok |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This research endeavors to present an analysis the characteristics of the power delivery and temperature between conventional energy storage systems (CESS) and hybrid energy storage systems (HESS) to aid in the development of advanced energy storage solutions for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The results demonstrate that the HESS allows batteries to achieve one additional discharge cycle compared to CESS. Additionally, HESS reduces the initial current response and power delivery by 30W, enabling greater energy consumption efficiency. The average surface temperature differential between the two systems is 1.2°C and the average peak differential is 1.6°C, as the HESS exhibits a slower temperature rise during discharge two cycle to end, due to the initial assistance provided by the supercapacitor and maintain smooth surface peak temperature. The findings highlight the potential for HESS to enhance UAV performance, indicating the need for longer experiment durations, stable room temperatures, and consideration of the mission profile for more accurate data. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2fd35f3cdf12434998b9e78799c0eb6a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2267-1242 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | EDP Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | E3S Web of Conferences |
| spelling | doaj-art-2fd35f3cdf12434998b9e78799c0eb6a2025-02-05T10:50:19ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422025-01-016100100610.1051/e3sconf/202561001006e3sconf_ri2c2025_01006Comparative characteristics of power delivery and temperature between conventional and hybrid energy storage systems in UAVsPhumma Prasophchok0Saikong Waiard1Power Engineering Technology, College of Industrial Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North BangkokResearch Centre for Combustion Technology and Alternative Energy (CTAE), Science and Technology Institute, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North BangkokThis research endeavors to present an analysis the characteristics of the power delivery and temperature between conventional energy storage systems (CESS) and hybrid energy storage systems (HESS) to aid in the development of advanced energy storage solutions for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The results demonstrate that the HESS allows batteries to achieve one additional discharge cycle compared to CESS. Additionally, HESS reduces the initial current response and power delivery by 30W, enabling greater energy consumption efficiency. The average surface temperature differential between the two systems is 1.2°C and the average peak differential is 1.6°C, as the HESS exhibits a slower temperature rise during discharge two cycle to end, due to the initial assistance provided by the supercapacitor and maintain smooth surface peak temperature. The findings highlight the potential for HESS to enhance UAV performance, indicating the need for longer experiment durations, stable room temperatures, and consideration of the mission profile for more accurate data.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/10/e3sconf_ri2c2025_01006.pdf |
| spellingShingle | Phumma Prasophchok Saikong Waiard Comparative characteristics of power delivery and temperature between conventional and hybrid energy storage systems in UAVs E3S Web of Conferences |
| title | Comparative characteristics of power delivery and temperature between conventional and hybrid energy storage systems in UAVs |
| title_full | Comparative characteristics of power delivery and temperature between conventional and hybrid energy storage systems in UAVs |
| title_fullStr | Comparative characteristics of power delivery and temperature between conventional and hybrid energy storage systems in UAVs |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative characteristics of power delivery and temperature between conventional and hybrid energy storage systems in UAVs |
| title_short | Comparative characteristics of power delivery and temperature between conventional and hybrid energy storage systems in UAVs |
| title_sort | comparative characteristics of power delivery and temperature between conventional and hybrid energy storage systems in uavs |
| url | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/10/e3sconf_ri2c2025_01006.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT phummaprasophchok comparativecharacteristicsofpowerdeliveryandtemperaturebetweenconventionalandhybridenergystoragesystemsinuavs AT saikongwaiard comparativecharacteristicsofpowerdeliveryandtemperaturebetweenconventionalandhybridenergystoragesystemsinuavs |