Non-contact tracking of shoulder bones using ultrasound and stereophotogrammetry

PurposeWe explored the integration of 3D ultrasound (US) imaging with motion capture technology for non-invasively tracking bones of the shoulder district during normal activity. Our study aimed to demonstrate ex-vivo the proposed 3D US method’s feasibility and accuracy of tracking shoulder bones in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Sewify, Maxence Lavaill, Dermot O’Rourke, Maria Antico, Peter Pivonka, Davide Fontanarosa, Saulo Martelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1514568/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087105603371008
author Ahmed Sewify
Ahmed Sewify
Maxence Lavaill
Maxence Lavaill
Dermot O’Rourke
Dermot O’Rourke
Maria Antico
Maria Antico
Peter Pivonka
Peter Pivonka
Davide Fontanarosa
Davide Fontanarosa
Saulo Martelli
Saulo Martelli
author_facet Ahmed Sewify
Ahmed Sewify
Maxence Lavaill
Maxence Lavaill
Dermot O’Rourke
Dermot O’Rourke
Maria Antico
Maria Antico
Peter Pivonka
Peter Pivonka
Davide Fontanarosa
Davide Fontanarosa
Saulo Martelli
Saulo Martelli
author_sort Ahmed Sewify
collection DOAJ
description PurposeWe explored the integration of 3D ultrasound (US) imaging with motion capture technology for non-invasively tracking bones of the shoulder district during normal activity. Our study aimed to demonstrate ex-vivo the proposed 3D US method’s feasibility and accuracy of tracking shoulder bones in a controlled cadaveric shoulder positioned in various arm elevations (low, mid and high).MethodWe registered previously acquired full bone shapes to spatially small bony surface patches segmented from 3D US. The bone registration approach used was based on in silico analyses that investigated the effects of different — 1) registration algorithms (Iterative-Closest-Point–ICP, and Coherent Point Drift–CPD) and 2) initial estimate levels of the bone model pose relative to the targeted final bone pose—on the overall registration efficiency and accuracy in a controlled environment.ResultsCPD provided the highest accuracy in the simulation at the cost of 8x longer computation compared to ICP. The RMSE errors were <1 mm for the humerus and scapula at all elevations. Ex-vivo, the CPD registration errors were (Humerus = 2 mm and Scapula = 13.9 mm) (Humerus = 7.2 mm and Scapula = 16.8 mm) and (Humerus = 14.28 mm and Scapula = 27.5 mm), for low, medium and high elevations respectively.ConclusionIn summary, we demonstrated the feasibility and accuracy of tracking shoulder bones with 3D US in a simulation and a cadaveric experiment. We discovered that CPD may be a more suitable registration method for the task than ICP. We also discussed that 3D US with motion capture technology is very promising for dynamic bone tracking, but the US technology may not be ready for the task yet.
format Article
id doaj-art-2fa0dafb20df4b0e86e95d338ba72f71
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-4185
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
spelling doaj-art-2fa0dafb20df4b0e86e95d338ba72f712025-02-06T07:10:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852025-02-011310.3389/fbioe.2025.15145681514568Non-contact tracking of shoulder bones using ultrasound and stereophotogrammetryAhmed Sewify0Ahmed Sewify1Maxence Lavaill2Maxence Lavaill3Dermot O’Rourke4Dermot O’Rourke5Maria Antico6Maria Antico7Peter Pivonka8Peter Pivonka9Davide Fontanarosa10Davide Fontanarosa11Saulo Martelli12Saulo Martelli13School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaCentre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaCentre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaCentre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaAustralian e-Health Research Centre, The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaCentre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaCentre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaCentre for Biomedical Technologies, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaSchool of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaPurposeWe explored the integration of 3D ultrasound (US) imaging with motion capture technology for non-invasively tracking bones of the shoulder district during normal activity. Our study aimed to demonstrate ex-vivo the proposed 3D US method’s feasibility and accuracy of tracking shoulder bones in a controlled cadaveric shoulder positioned in various arm elevations (low, mid and high).MethodWe registered previously acquired full bone shapes to spatially small bony surface patches segmented from 3D US. The bone registration approach used was based on in silico analyses that investigated the effects of different — 1) registration algorithms (Iterative-Closest-Point–ICP, and Coherent Point Drift–CPD) and 2) initial estimate levels of the bone model pose relative to the targeted final bone pose—on the overall registration efficiency and accuracy in a controlled environment.ResultsCPD provided the highest accuracy in the simulation at the cost of 8x longer computation compared to ICP. The RMSE errors were <1 mm for the humerus and scapula at all elevations. Ex-vivo, the CPD registration errors were (Humerus = 2 mm and Scapula = 13.9 mm) (Humerus = 7.2 mm and Scapula = 16.8 mm) and (Humerus = 14.28 mm and Scapula = 27.5 mm), for low, medium and high elevations respectively.ConclusionIn summary, we demonstrated the feasibility and accuracy of tracking shoulder bones with 3D US in a simulation and a cadaveric experiment. We discovered that CPD may be a more suitable registration method for the task than ICP. We also discussed that 3D US with motion capture technology is very promising for dynamic bone tracking, but the US technology may not be ready for the task yet.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1514568/fullbone trackingultrasound3D-ultrasoundbone registrationex-vivostereophotogrammetry
spellingShingle Ahmed Sewify
Ahmed Sewify
Maxence Lavaill
Maxence Lavaill
Dermot O’Rourke
Dermot O’Rourke
Maria Antico
Maria Antico
Peter Pivonka
Peter Pivonka
Davide Fontanarosa
Davide Fontanarosa
Saulo Martelli
Saulo Martelli
Non-contact tracking of shoulder bones using ultrasound and stereophotogrammetry
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
bone tracking
ultrasound
3D-ultrasound
bone registration
ex-vivo
stereophotogrammetry
title Non-contact tracking of shoulder bones using ultrasound and stereophotogrammetry
title_full Non-contact tracking of shoulder bones using ultrasound and stereophotogrammetry
title_fullStr Non-contact tracking of shoulder bones using ultrasound and stereophotogrammetry
title_full_unstemmed Non-contact tracking of shoulder bones using ultrasound and stereophotogrammetry
title_short Non-contact tracking of shoulder bones using ultrasound and stereophotogrammetry
title_sort non contact tracking of shoulder bones using ultrasound and stereophotogrammetry
topic bone tracking
ultrasound
3D-ultrasound
bone registration
ex-vivo
stereophotogrammetry
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1514568/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedsewify noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT ahmedsewify noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT maxencelavaill noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT maxencelavaill noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT dermotorourke noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT dermotorourke noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT mariaantico noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT mariaantico noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT peterpivonka noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT peterpivonka noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT davidefontanarosa noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT davidefontanarosa noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT saulomartelli noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry
AT saulomartelli noncontacttrackingofshoulderbonesusingultrasoundandstereophotogrammetry