An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators
The study was done to assess the sealing ability and adaptation of RealSeal 1, and to compare it with Thermafil. 65 single-rooted extracted teeth were selected and root canal treatment was performed. Root canals were obturated with RealSeal 1 or Thermafil. A double chamber bacterial leakage model us...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2013-01-01
|
Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/532023 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832567159301079040 |
---|---|
author | Ahmed Alkahtani Sara Al-Subait Sukumaran Anil |
author_facet | Ahmed Alkahtani Sara Al-Subait Sukumaran Anil |
author_sort | Ahmed Alkahtani |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The study was done to assess the sealing ability and adaptation of RealSeal 1, and to compare it with Thermafil. 65 single-rooted extracted teeth were selected and root canal treatment was performed. Root canals were obturated with RealSeal 1 or Thermafil. A double chamber bacterial leakage model using E. faecalis was developed to assess the sealing ability. Samples were monitored daily for 60 days. After the bacterial leakage test, samples were embedded in resin and sectioned horizontally at 2 and 4 mm from the apical foramen. Specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope and digitally photographed. AutoCAD software was used to measure the gap between the canal surface and obturation material. Results were statistically analyzed using nonparametric Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the bacterial leakage and t-test to compare the means of gap in RealSeal 1 and Thermafil at 2 and 4 mm. There was no significant difference between the RealSeal 1 and Thermafil with respect to leakage over time. At 2 mm and 4 mm, RealSeal 1 had significantly more gaps than Thermafil. From the observations it can be concluded that RealSeal 1 and Thermafil have comparable performance in terms of adaptation and sealing ability. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-2f59c0e0c1c043b0bf59b42fd5b788f5 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1537-744X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | The Scientific World Journal |
spelling | doaj-art-2f59c0e0c1c043b0bf59b42fd5b788f52025-02-03T01:02:09ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2013-01-01201310.1155/2013/532023532023An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal ObturatorsAhmed Alkahtani0Sara Al-Subait1Sukumaran Anil2Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 300353, Riyadh 11372, Saudi ArabiaDental Caries Research Chair, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi ArabiaThe study was done to assess the sealing ability and adaptation of RealSeal 1, and to compare it with Thermafil. 65 single-rooted extracted teeth were selected and root canal treatment was performed. Root canals were obturated with RealSeal 1 or Thermafil. A double chamber bacterial leakage model using E. faecalis was developed to assess the sealing ability. Samples were monitored daily for 60 days. After the bacterial leakage test, samples were embedded in resin and sectioned horizontally at 2 and 4 mm from the apical foramen. Specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope and digitally photographed. AutoCAD software was used to measure the gap between the canal surface and obturation material. Results were statistically analyzed using nonparametric Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the bacterial leakage and t-test to compare the means of gap in RealSeal 1 and Thermafil at 2 and 4 mm. There was no significant difference between the RealSeal 1 and Thermafil with respect to leakage over time. At 2 mm and 4 mm, RealSeal 1 had significantly more gaps than Thermafil. From the observations it can be concluded that RealSeal 1 and Thermafil have comparable performance in terms of adaptation and sealing ability.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/532023 |
spellingShingle | Ahmed Alkahtani Sara Al-Subait Sukumaran Anil An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators The Scientific World Journal |
title | An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators |
title_full | An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators |
title_fullStr | An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators |
title_full_unstemmed | An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators |
title_short | An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators |
title_sort | in vitro comparative study of the adaptation and sealing ability of two carrier based root canal obturators |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/532023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmedalkahtani aninvitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators AT saraalsubait aninvitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators AT sukumarananil aninvitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators AT ahmedalkahtani invitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators AT saraalsubait invitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators AT sukumarananil invitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators |