An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators

The study was done to assess the sealing ability and adaptation of RealSeal 1, and to compare it with Thermafil. 65 single-rooted extracted teeth were selected and root canal treatment was performed. Root canals were obturated with RealSeal 1 or Thermafil. A double chamber bacterial leakage model us...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Alkahtani, Sara Al-Subait, Sukumaran Anil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/532023
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567159301079040
author Ahmed Alkahtani
Sara Al-Subait
Sukumaran Anil
author_facet Ahmed Alkahtani
Sara Al-Subait
Sukumaran Anil
author_sort Ahmed Alkahtani
collection DOAJ
description The study was done to assess the sealing ability and adaptation of RealSeal 1, and to compare it with Thermafil. 65 single-rooted extracted teeth were selected and root canal treatment was performed. Root canals were obturated with RealSeal 1 or Thermafil. A double chamber bacterial leakage model using E. faecalis was developed to assess the sealing ability. Samples were monitored daily for 60 days. After the bacterial leakage test, samples were embedded in resin and sectioned horizontally at 2 and 4 mm from the apical foramen. Specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope and digitally photographed. AutoCAD software was used to measure the gap between the canal surface and obturation material. Results were statistically analyzed using nonparametric Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the bacterial leakage and t-test to compare the means of gap in RealSeal 1 and Thermafil at 2 and 4 mm. There was no significant difference between the RealSeal 1 and Thermafil with respect to leakage over time. At 2 mm and 4 mm, RealSeal 1 had significantly more gaps than Thermafil. From the observations it can be concluded that RealSeal 1 and Thermafil have comparable performance in terms of adaptation and sealing ability.
format Article
id doaj-art-2f59c0e0c1c043b0bf59b42fd5b788f5
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-2f59c0e0c1c043b0bf59b42fd5b788f52025-02-03T01:02:09ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2013-01-01201310.1155/2013/532023532023An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal ObturatorsAhmed Alkahtani0Sara Al-Subait1Sukumaran Anil2Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 300353, Riyadh 11372, Saudi ArabiaDental Caries Research Chair, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi ArabiaThe study was done to assess the sealing ability and adaptation of RealSeal 1, and to compare it with Thermafil. 65 single-rooted extracted teeth were selected and root canal treatment was performed. Root canals were obturated with RealSeal 1 or Thermafil. A double chamber bacterial leakage model using E. faecalis was developed to assess the sealing ability. Samples were monitored daily for 60 days. After the bacterial leakage test, samples were embedded in resin and sectioned horizontally at 2 and 4 mm from the apical foramen. Specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope and digitally photographed. AutoCAD software was used to measure the gap between the canal surface and obturation material. Results were statistically analyzed using nonparametric Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the bacterial leakage and t-test to compare the means of gap in RealSeal 1 and Thermafil at 2 and 4 mm. There was no significant difference between the RealSeal 1 and Thermafil with respect to leakage over time. At 2 mm and 4 mm, RealSeal 1 had significantly more gaps than Thermafil. From the observations it can be concluded that RealSeal 1 and Thermafil have comparable performance in terms of adaptation and sealing ability.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/532023
spellingShingle Ahmed Alkahtani
Sara Al-Subait
Sukumaran Anil
An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators
The Scientific World Journal
title An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators
title_full An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators
title_fullStr An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators
title_full_unstemmed An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators
title_short An In Vitro Comparative Study of the Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Two Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturators
title_sort in vitro comparative study of the adaptation and sealing ability of two carrier based root canal obturators
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/532023
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedalkahtani aninvitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators
AT saraalsubait aninvitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators
AT sukumarananil aninvitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators
AT ahmedalkahtani invitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators
AT saraalsubait invitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators
AT sukumarananil invitrocomparativestudyoftheadaptationandsealingabilityoftwocarrierbasedrootcanalobturators