How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objective:. Guidelines advise to perform endoscopic surveillance following ileocolic resection (ICR) in Crohn disease (CD) for timely diagnosis of recurrence. This study aims to assess the variation in endoscopic recurrence (ER) rates in patients after ICR for CD using the most commonly used classif...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Annals of Surgery Open |
| Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000397 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832589686665641984 |
|---|---|
| author | Eline M. L. van der Does de Willebois, MD Vittoria Bellato, MD Marjolijn Duijvestein, MD, PhD Susan van Dieren, MD, PhD Silvio Danese, MD, PhD Pierpaolo Sileri, MD, PhD Christianne J. Buskens, MD, PhD Andrea Vignali, MD, PhD Willem A. Bemelman, MD, PhD |
| author_facet | Eline M. L. van der Does de Willebois, MD Vittoria Bellato, MD Marjolijn Duijvestein, MD, PhD Susan van Dieren, MD, PhD Silvio Danese, MD, PhD Pierpaolo Sileri, MD, PhD Christianne J. Buskens, MD, PhD Andrea Vignali, MD, PhD Willem A. Bemelman, MD, PhD |
| author_sort | Eline M. L. van der Does de Willebois, MD |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective:. Guidelines advise to perform endoscopic surveillance following ileocolic resection (ICR) in Crohn disease (CD) for timely diagnosis of recurrence. This study aims to assess the variation in endoscopic recurrence (ER) rates in patients after ICR for CD using the most commonly used classification systems, the Rutgeerts score (RS) and modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) classifications.
Methods:. A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies describing ER < 12 months after an ICR for CD were included. Animal studies, reviews, case reports (<30 included patients), pediatric studies, and letters were excluded. The Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and Cochrane Collaboration’s tool were used to assess risk of bias. Main outcome was the range of ER rates within 12 months postoperatively, defined as RS ≥ i2 and/or mRS ≥ i2b. A proportional meta-analysis was performed. The final search was performed on January 4, 2022. The study was registered at PROSPERO, CRD42022363208.
Results:. Seventy-six studies comprising 7751 patients were included. The weighted mean of ER rates in all included studies was 44.0% (95% confidence interval, 43.56–44.43). The overall range was 5.0% to 93.0% [interquartile range (IQR), 29.2–59.0]. The weighted means for RS and mRS were 44.0% and 41.1%, respectively. The variation in ER rates for RS and mRS were 5.0% to 93.0% (IQR, 29.0–59.5) and 19.8% to 62.9% (IQR, 37.3–46.5), respectively. Within studies reporting both RS and mRS, the weighted means for ER were 61.3% and 40.6%, respectively.
Conclusions:. This study demonstrates a major variation in ER rates after ICR for CD, suggesting a high likelihood of inadequate diagnosis of disease recurrence, with potentially impact on quality of life and health care consumption. Therefore, there is an important need to improve endoscopic scoring of recurrent disease. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2f2e98a8c22a41e4bd1af3331b800eb8 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2691-3593 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Annals of Surgery Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-2f2e98a8c22a41e4bd1af3331b800eb82025-01-24T09:18:25ZengWolters Kluwer HealthAnnals of Surgery Open2691-35932024-03-0151e39710.1097/AS9.0000000000000397202403000-00035How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisEline M. L. van der Does de Willebois, MD0Vittoria Bellato, MD1Marjolijn Duijvestein, MD, PhD2Susan van Dieren, MD, PhD3Silvio Danese, MD, PhD4Pierpaolo Sileri, MD, PhD5Christianne J. Buskens, MD, PhD6Andrea Vignali, MD, PhD7Willem A. Bemelman, MD, PhD8* From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands† Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, HSR, Milan, Italy‡ Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands* From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands† Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, HSR, Milan, Italy† Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, HSR, Milan, Italy* From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands† Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, HSR, Milan, Italy* From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsObjective:. Guidelines advise to perform endoscopic surveillance following ileocolic resection (ICR) in Crohn disease (CD) for timely diagnosis of recurrence. This study aims to assess the variation in endoscopic recurrence (ER) rates in patients after ICR for CD using the most commonly used classification systems, the Rutgeerts score (RS) and modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) classifications. Methods:. A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies describing ER < 12 months after an ICR for CD were included. Animal studies, reviews, case reports (<30 included patients), pediatric studies, and letters were excluded. The Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and Cochrane Collaboration’s tool were used to assess risk of bias. Main outcome was the range of ER rates within 12 months postoperatively, defined as RS ≥ i2 and/or mRS ≥ i2b. A proportional meta-analysis was performed. The final search was performed on January 4, 2022. The study was registered at PROSPERO, CRD42022363208. Results:. Seventy-six studies comprising 7751 patients were included. The weighted mean of ER rates in all included studies was 44.0% (95% confidence interval, 43.56–44.43). The overall range was 5.0% to 93.0% [interquartile range (IQR), 29.2–59.0]. The weighted means for RS and mRS were 44.0% and 41.1%, respectively. The variation in ER rates for RS and mRS were 5.0% to 93.0% (IQR, 29.0–59.5) and 19.8% to 62.9% (IQR, 37.3–46.5), respectively. Within studies reporting both RS and mRS, the weighted means for ER were 61.3% and 40.6%, respectively. Conclusions:. This study demonstrates a major variation in ER rates after ICR for CD, suggesting a high likelihood of inadequate diagnosis of disease recurrence, with potentially impact on quality of life and health care consumption. Therefore, there is an important need to improve endoscopic scoring of recurrent disease.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000397 |
| spellingShingle | Eline M. L. van der Does de Willebois, MD Vittoria Bellato, MD Marjolijn Duijvestein, MD, PhD Susan van Dieren, MD, PhD Silvio Danese, MD, PhD Pierpaolo Sileri, MD, PhD Christianne J. Buskens, MD, PhD Andrea Vignali, MD, PhD Willem A. Bemelman, MD, PhD How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Annals of Surgery Open |
| title | How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_full | How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_fullStr | How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_short | How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_sort | how reliable is endoscopic scoring of postoperative recurrence in crohn disease a systematic review and meta analysis |
| url | http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000397 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elinemlvanderdoesdewilleboismd howreliableisendoscopicscoringofpostoperativerecurrenceincrohndiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vittoriabellatomd howreliableisendoscopicscoringofpostoperativerecurrenceincrohndiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT marjolijnduijvesteinmdphd howreliableisendoscopicscoringofpostoperativerecurrenceincrohndiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT susanvandierenmdphd howreliableisendoscopicscoringofpostoperativerecurrenceincrohndiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT silviodanesemdphd howreliableisendoscopicscoringofpostoperativerecurrenceincrohndiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pierpaolosilerimdphd howreliableisendoscopicscoringofpostoperativerecurrenceincrohndiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT christiannejbuskensmdphd howreliableisendoscopicscoringofpostoperativerecurrenceincrohndiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT andreavignalimdphd howreliableisendoscopicscoringofpostoperativerecurrenceincrohndiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT willemabemelmanmdphd howreliableisendoscopicscoringofpostoperativerecurrenceincrohndiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |