Nonspecificity of Chronic Soft Tissue Pain Syndromes

Persistent (or chronic) pain occurs with a prevalence of about 10% in the adult population, and chronic soft tissue pain is especially problematic. Criteria for diagnosis of these soft tissue pain disorders appear to suffer from specificity problems, even though they appear to be sensitive in distin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eldon Tunks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1997-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/694734
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560722586894336
author Eldon Tunks
author_facet Eldon Tunks
author_sort Eldon Tunks
collection DOAJ
description Persistent (or chronic) pain occurs with a prevalence of about 10% in the adult population, and chronic soft tissue pain is especially problematic. Criteria for diagnosis of these soft tissue pain disorders appear to suffer from specificity problems, even though they appear to be sensitive in distinguishing normal from soft tissue pain sufferers. A few decades ago the term 'neuraesthenia' was used as a diagnosis in individuals who now would probably be diagnosed as suffering from fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue and anxiety disorders with fatigue. Soft tissue pain provokes skepticism, especially among third-party payers, and controversy among clinicians. Recent epidemiological studies have demonstrated sex differences in the prevalence of widespread pain and multiple tender points, which are distributed variably throughout the adult population and tend to be correlated with subjective symptoms. Although there is a tendency for these syndromes to persist, follow-up studies show that they tend to vary in extent and sometimes show remissions over longer follow-up, casting doubt about the distinctions between chronic diffuse pains and localized chronic soft tissue pains. Because both accidents and soft tissue pains are relatively prevalent problems, the possibility of chance coincidence of accident and chronic soft tissue pain in an individual creates the need to be cautious in attributing these syndromes to specific accidents in medicolegal situations. At the same time, the available evidence does not support a generally dismissive attitude towards these patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-2f1097a273dc42f48f86084ec15c2b75
institution Kabale University
issn 1203-6765
language English
publishDate 1997-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pain Research and Management
spelling doaj-art-2f1097a273dc42f48f86084ec15c2b752025-02-03T01:26:48ZengWileyPain Research and Management1203-67651997-01-012317618010.1155/1997/694734Nonspecificity of Chronic Soft Tissue Pain SyndromesEldon Tunks0McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CanadaPersistent (or chronic) pain occurs with a prevalence of about 10% in the adult population, and chronic soft tissue pain is especially problematic. Criteria for diagnosis of these soft tissue pain disorders appear to suffer from specificity problems, even though they appear to be sensitive in distinguishing normal from soft tissue pain sufferers. A few decades ago the term 'neuraesthenia' was used as a diagnosis in individuals who now would probably be diagnosed as suffering from fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue and anxiety disorders with fatigue. Soft tissue pain provokes skepticism, especially among third-party payers, and controversy among clinicians. Recent epidemiological studies have demonstrated sex differences in the prevalence of widespread pain and multiple tender points, which are distributed variably throughout the adult population and tend to be correlated with subjective symptoms. Although there is a tendency for these syndromes to persist, follow-up studies show that they tend to vary in extent and sometimes show remissions over longer follow-up, casting doubt about the distinctions between chronic diffuse pains and localized chronic soft tissue pains. Because both accidents and soft tissue pains are relatively prevalent problems, the possibility of chance coincidence of accident and chronic soft tissue pain in an individual creates the need to be cautious in attributing these syndromes to specific accidents in medicolegal situations. At the same time, the available evidence does not support a generally dismissive attitude towards these patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/694734
spellingShingle Eldon Tunks
Nonspecificity of Chronic Soft Tissue Pain Syndromes
Pain Research and Management
title Nonspecificity of Chronic Soft Tissue Pain Syndromes
title_full Nonspecificity of Chronic Soft Tissue Pain Syndromes
title_fullStr Nonspecificity of Chronic Soft Tissue Pain Syndromes
title_full_unstemmed Nonspecificity of Chronic Soft Tissue Pain Syndromes
title_short Nonspecificity of Chronic Soft Tissue Pain Syndromes
title_sort nonspecificity of chronic soft tissue pain syndromes
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/694734
work_keys_str_mv AT eldontunks nonspecificityofchronicsofttissuepainsyndromes