Motion-Computerized Tomographic Colography is a Better Method for Screening for Polyps: Arguments for the Motion
Colorectal cancer is an important public health problem that is amenable to prevention and early treatment. Traditional screening techniques - fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, barium enema and colonoscopy - each have limitations in terms of diagnostic accuracy, cost and/or patient...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Benoit C Pineau |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2003-01-01
|
Series: | Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2003/210940 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Motion - Pancreatic Endoscopy is Useful for the Pain of Chronic Pancreatitis: Arguments for the Motion
by: Stanley M Branch
Published: (2003-01-01) -
Motion – Helicobacter pylori Causes or Worsens GERD: Arguments against the Motion
by: Kenneth EL McColl
Published: (2002-01-01) -
Motion – The Available Treatments for Hepatitis C Are Cost Effective: Arguments against the Motion
by: W Ray Kim
Published: (2002-01-01) -
Motion-Genetic Testing is Useful in the Diagnosis of Nonhereditary Pancreatic Conditions: Arguments Against the Motion
by: Jonathan A Cohn
Published: (2003-01-01) -
Motion – All Patients with GERD Should Be Offered Once in a Lifetime Endoscopy: Arguments for the Motion
by: David Armstrong
Published: (2002-01-01)