Effects of congruent and incongruent appetitive and aversive well-being comparisons on depression, post-traumatic stress, and self-esteem
Background: People compare their current well-being to different comparison standards (e.g. social or temporal comparisons). These standards are considered as aversive if perceived as threatening to self-motives or appetitive if perceived as consistent with self-motives. However, it remains unknown...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Emily N. Keppler, Nexhmedin Morina, Pascal Schlechter |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2025-12-01
|
Series: | European Journal of Psychotraumatology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/20008066.2025.2454193 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Parents’ social comparisons and adolescent self-esteem: the mediating effect of upward social comparison and the moderating influence of optimism
by: Hongyang Liu, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Can governance mechanisms minimize agency costs?
by: Linda Linda, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01) -
SELF-ESTEEM AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
by: Carla Patrícia Correia Neves, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MINAHASA FOLKLORES “TOAR LUMIMUUT” AND “SIGARLAKI LIMBAT” THROUGH WORLD LITERATURE PERSPECTIVES
by: Dewi Christa Kobis, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Symptom relief of persistent postural perceptual dizziness with acupuncture interventions
by: Xiwen Wang, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)