The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study
Background. A major concern in intervention studies is the generalizability of the findings due to refusal of intended participants to actually take part. In studies including ill older people the number of those declining to participate may be large and the concern is therefore relevant. Objectives...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Scientifica |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2787282 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832563209060483072 |
|---|---|
| author | Elizabeth Rosted Ingrid Poulsen Carsten Hendriksen Lis Wagner |
| author_facet | Elizabeth Rosted Ingrid Poulsen Carsten Hendriksen Lis Wagner |
| author_sort | Elizabeth Rosted |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background. A major concern in intervention studies is the generalizability of the findings due to refusal of intended participants to actually take part. In studies including ill older people the number of those declining to participate may be large and the concern is therefore relevant. Objectives. To compare patients characteristics, rates of acute readmission, and mortality after one and six months among older persons who agreed and those who declined to participate in a randomized controlled trial and to describe subgroups of nonparticipants. Design. Comparative study based on a randomized controlled trial. Setting. University hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark. Participants. Patients ≥70 years discharged home after a short Emergency Department stay. 399 were requested to participate; 271 consented, whereas 128 refused. Results. Refusers were more likely to be readmitted (p<0.001) or die (p=0.006). The largest subgroup of refusers described as “too ill” had the highest risk of readmission (OR = 3.00, 95% CI = 1.61–5.47, p=0.001) and of mortality within six months (OR = 3.50, 95% CI = 1.64–7.49, p=0.002). However, this seems not to have affected the results of our randomized study. Conclusion. We recommend that intervention studies among older people or other fragile patient groups include analysis of relevant risk and subgroup analyses of refusers. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2e5bf6cca4ce426faf21181f8a8a832e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2090-908X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientifica |
| spelling | doaj-art-2e5bf6cca4ce426faf21181f8a8a832e2025-02-03T01:20:41ZengWileyScientifica2090-908X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/27872822787282The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention StudyElizabeth Rosted0Ingrid Poulsen1Carsten Hendriksen2Lis Wagner3Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre, 2300 Copenhagen S, DenmarkRUBRIC, Clinic of Neurorehabilitation, TBI Unit, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkInstitute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen and Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, 2400 Copenhagen NV, DenmarkResearch Unit of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, DenmarkBackground. A major concern in intervention studies is the generalizability of the findings due to refusal of intended participants to actually take part. In studies including ill older people the number of those declining to participate may be large and the concern is therefore relevant. Objectives. To compare patients characteristics, rates of acute readmission, and mortality after one and six months among older persons who agreed and those who declined to participate in a randomized controlled trial and to describe subgroups of nonparticipants. Design. Comparative study based on a randomized controlled trial. Setting. University hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark. Participants. Patients ≥70 years discharged home after a short Emergency Department stay. 399 were requested to participate; 271 consented, whereas 128 refused. Results. Refusers were more likely to be readmitted (p<0.001) or die (p=0.006). The largest subgroup of refusers described as “too ill” had the highest risk of readmission (OR = 3.00, 95% CI = 1.61–5.47, p=0.001) and of mortality within six months (OR = 3.50, 95% CI = 1.64–7.49, p=0.002). However, this seems not to have affected the results of our randomized study. Conclusion. We recommend that intervention studies among older people or other fragile patient groups include analysis of relevant risk and subgroup analyses of refusers.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2787282 |
| spellingShingle | Elizabeth Rosted Ingrid Poulsen Carsten Hendriksen Lis Wagner The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study Scientifica |
| title | The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study |
| title_full | The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study |
| title_fullStr | The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study |
| title_short | The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study |
| title_sort | importance of risk and subgroup analysis of nonparticipants in a geriatric intervention study |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2787282 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elizabethrosted theimportanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy AT ingridpoulsen theimportanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy AT carstenhendriksen theimportanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy AT liswagner theimportanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy AT elizabethrosted importanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy AT ingridpoulsen importanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy AT carstenhendriksen importanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy AT liswagner importanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy |