The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study

Background. A major concern in intervention studies is the generalizability of the findings due to refusal of intended participants to actually take part. In studies including ill older people the number of those declining to participate may be large and the concern is therefore relevant. Objectives...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth Rosted, Ingrid Poulsen, Carsten Hendriksen, Lis Wagner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Scientifica
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2787282
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563209060483072
author Elizabeth Rosted
Ingrid Poulsen
Carsten Hendriksen
Lis Wagner
author_facet Elizabeth Rosted
Ingrid Poulsen
Carsten Hendriksen
Lis Wagner
author_sort Elizabeth Rosted
collection DOAJ
description Background. A major concern in intervention studies is the generalizability of the findings due to refusal of intended participants to actually take part. In studies including ill older people the number of those declining to participate may be large and the concern is therefore relevant. Objectives. To compare patients characteristics, rates of acute readmission, and mortality after one and six months among older persons who agreed and those who declined to participate in a randomized controlled trial and to describe subgroups of nonparticipants. Design. Comparative study based on a randomized controlled trial. Setting. University hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark. Participants. Patients ≥70 years discharged home after a short Emergency Department stay. 399 were requested to participate; 271 consented, whereas 128 refused. Results. Refusers were more likely to be readmitted (p<0.001) or die (p=0.006). The largest subgroup of refusers described as “too ill” had the highest risk of readmission (OR = 3.00, 95% CI = 1.61–5.47, p=0.001) and of mortality within six months (OR = 3.50, 95% CI = 1.64–7.49, p=0.002). However, this seems not to have affected the results of our randomized study. Conclusion. We recommend that intervention studies among older people or other fragile patient groups include analysis of relevant risk and subgroup analyses of refusers.
format Article
id doaj-art-2e5bf6cca4ce426faf21181f8a8a832e
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-908X
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Scientifica
spelling doaj-art-2e5bf6cca4ce426faf21181f8a8a832e2025-02-03T01:20:41ZengWileyScientifica2090-908X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/27872822787282The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention StudyElizabeth Rosted0Ingrid Poulsen1Carsten Hendriksen2Lis Wagner3Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre, 2300 Copenhagen S, DenmarkRUBRIC, Clinic of Neurorehabilitation, TBI Unit, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkInstitute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen and Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, 2400 Copenhagen NV, DenmarkResearch Unit of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, DenmarkBackground. A major concern in intervention studies is the generalizability of the findings due to refusal of intended participants to actually take part. In studies including ill older people the number of those declining to participate may be large and the concern is therefore relevant. Objectives. To compare patients characteristics, rates of acute readmission, and mortality after one and six months among older persons who agreed and those who declined to participate in a randomized controlled trial and to describe subgroups of nonparticipants. Design. Comparative study based on a randomized controlled trial. Setting. University hospital in the Capital Region of Denmark. Participants. Patients ≥70 years discharged home after a short Emergency Department stay. 399 were requested to participate; 271 consented, whereas 128 refused. Results. Refusers were more likely to be readmitted (p<0.001) or die (p=0.006). The largest subgroup of refusers described as “too ill” had the highest risk of readmission (OR = 3.00, 95% CI = 1.61–5.47, p=0.001) and of mortality within six months (OR = 3.50, 95% CI = 1.64–7.49, p=0.002). However, this seems not to have affected the results of our randomized study. Conclusion. We recommend that intervention studies among older people or other fragile patient groups include analysis of relevant risk and subgroup analyses of refusers.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2787282
spellingShingle Elizabeth Rosted
Ingrid Poulsen
Carsten Hendriksen
Lis Wagner
The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study
Scientifica
title The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study
title_full The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study
title_fullStr The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study
title_full_unstemmed The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study
title_short The Importance of Risk and Subgroup Analysis of Nonparticipants in a Geriatric Intervention Study
title_sort importance of risk and subgroup analysis of nonparticipants in a geriatric intervention study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2787282
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethrosted theimportanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy
AT ingridpoulsen theimportanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy
AT carstenhendriksen theimportanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy
AT liswagner theimportanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy
AT elizabethrosted importanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy
AT ingridpoulsen importanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy
AT carstenhendriksen importanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy
AT liswagner importanceofriskandsubgroupanalysisofnonparticipantsinageriatricinterventionstudy