Entre statut phrastique et statut textuel : l’exemple des énoncés situationnels

Among statements related to a situation and subject to a fixed enunciation, some can be mainly considered as (isolated) sentences, while others are mainly fragments of discourse. The first category can, for example, introduce a modality (Tu parles (que non)!), while the second one has a discourse-fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christiane Marque-Pucheu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses universitaires de Caen 2011-12-01
Series:Discours
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/discours/8553
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832581842517098496
author Christiane Marque-Pucheu
author_facet Christiane Marque-Pucheu
author_sort Christiane Marque-Pucheu
collection DOAJ
description Among statements related to a situation and subject to a fixed enunciation, some can be mainly considered as (isolated) sentences, while others are mainly fragments of discourse. The first category can, for example, introduce a modality (Tu parles (que non)!), while the second one has a discourse-framing function: Qu’est-ce qui me/nous dit que P? may take up previous information, enabling an argument to be developed over several sentences. Defining the boundary between sentential and textual status is no easy matter. Both types of statement have a strong argumentative power, and can target different strategies: they sometimes highlight argumentative homogeneity (Je ne te le fais pas dire), while sometimes introducing counter-arguments (Je ne voudrais pas dire… mais); they may also play with implicit messages (infra-text): for example, in Je me comprends, what the reader understands is Tu ne me comprends pas.
format Article
id doaj-art-2cbeaecfa9704aa6ba6ffb21d40a7bfa
institution Kabale University
issn 1963-1723
language English
publishDate 2011-12-01
publisher Presses universitaires de Caen
record_format Article
series Discours
spelling doaj-art-2cbeaecfa9704aa6ba6ffb21d40a7bfa2025-01-30T09:52:39ZengPresses universitaires de CaenDiscours1963-17232011-12-01910.4000/discours.8553Entre statut phrastique et statut textuel : l’exemple des énoncés situationnelsChristiane Marque-PucheuAmong statements related to a situation and subject to a fixed enunciation, some can be mainly considered as (isolated) sentences, while others are mainly fragments of discourse. The first category can, for example, introduce a modality (Tu parles (que non)!), while the second one has a discourse-framing function: Qu’est-ce qui me/nous dit que P? may take up previous information, enabling an argument to be developed over several sentences. Defining the boundary between sentential and textual status is no easy matter. Both types of statement have a strong argumentative power, and can target different strategies: they sometimes highlight argumentative homogeneity (Je ne te le fais pas dire), while sometimes introducing counter-arguments (Je ne voudrais pas dire… mais); they may also play with implicit messages (infra-text): for example, in Je me comprends, what the reader understands is Tu ne me comprends pas.https://journals.openedition.org/discours/8553textargumentationsentenceframework of discoursefixed enunciationimplicit
spellingShingle Christiane Marque-Pucheu
Entre statut phrastique et statut textuel : l’exemple des énoncés situationnels
Discours
text
argumentation
sentence
framework of discourse
fixed enunciation
implicit
title Entre statut phrastique et statut textuel : l’exemple des énoncés situationnels
title_full Entre statut phrastique et statut textuel : l’exemple des énoncés situationnels
title_fullStr Entre statut phrastique et statut textuel : l’exemple des énoncés situationnels
title_full_unstemmed Entre statut phrastique et statut textuel : l’exemple des énoncés situationnels
title_short Entre statut phrastique et statut textuel : l’exemple des énoncés situationnels
title_sort entre statut phrastique et statut textuel l exemple des enonces situationnels
topic text
argumentation
sentence
framework of discourse
fixed enunciation
implicit
url https://journals.openedition.org/discours/8553
work_keys_str_mv AT christianemarquepucheu entrestatutphrastiqueetstatuttextuellexempledesenoncessituationnels