A Comparative Study of Raw and Metal Oxide Impregnated Carbon Nanotubes for the Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution

The present study reports the use of raw, iron oxide, and aluminum oxide impregnated carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for the adsorption of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) ions from aqueous solution. The raw CNTs were impregnated with 1% and 10% loadings (weight %) of iron oxide and aluminum oxide nanoparticles...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad I. Qureshi, Faheemuddin Patel, Nadhir Al-Baghli, Basim Abussaud, Bassam S. Tawabini, Tahar Laoui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1624243
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832557081692995584
author Muhammad I. Qureshi
Faheemuddin Patel
Nadhir Al-Baghli
Basim Abussaud
Bassam S. Tawabini
Tahar Laoui
author_facet Muhammad I. Qureshi
Faheemuddin Patel
Nadhir Al-Baghli
Basim Abussaud
Bassam S. Tawabini
Tahar Laoui
author_sort Muhammad I. Qureshi
collection DOAJ
description The present study reports the use of raw, iron oxide, and aluminum oxide impregnated carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for the adsorption of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) ions from aqueous solution. The raw CNTs were impregnated with 1% and 10% loadings (weight %) of iron oxide and aluminum oxide nanoparticles using wet impregnation technique. The synthesized materials were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Batch adsorption experiments were performed to assess the removal efficiency of Cr(VI) ions from water and the effects of pH, contact time, adsorbent dosage, and initial concentration of the Cr(VI) ions were investigated. Results of the study revealed that impregnated CNTs achieved significant increase in the removal efficiency of Cr(VI) ions compared to raw CNTs. In fact, both CNTs impregnated with 10% loading of iron and aluminum oxides were able to remove up to 100% of Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solution. Isotherm studies were carried out using Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. Adsorption kinetics of Cr(VI) ions from water was found to be well described by the pseudo-second-order model. The results suggest that metallic oxide impregnated CNTs have very good potential application in the removal of Cr(VI) ions from water resulting in better environmental protection.
format Article
id doaj-art-2c9a669c20874d6fa55a1e11b4ebdbbf
institution Kabale University
issn 1565-3633
1687-479X
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications
spelling doaj-art-2c9a669c20874d6fa55a1e11b4ebdbbf2025-02-03T05:43:37ZengWileyBioinorganic Chemistry and Applications1565-36331687-479X2017-01-01201710.1155/2017/16242431624243A Comparative Study of Raw and Metal Oxide Impregnated Carbon Nanotubes for the Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous SolutionMuhammad I. Qureshi0Faheemuddin Patel1Nadhir Al-Baghli2Basim Abussaud3Bassam S. Tawabini4Tahar Laoui5Department of Chemical Engineering, KFUPM, Dhahran 31261, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KFUPM, Dhahran 31261, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KFUPM, Dhahran 31261, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KFUPM, Dhahran 31261, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Geosciences, KFUPM, Dhahran 31261, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KFUPM, Dhahran 31261, Saudi ArabiaThe present study reports the use of raw, iron oxide, and aluminum oxide impregnated carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for the adsorption of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) ions from aqueous solution. The raw CNTs were impregnated with 1% and 10% loadings (weight %) of iron oxide and aluminum oxide nanoparticles using wet impregnation technique. The synthesized materials were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Batch adsorption experiments were performed to assess the removal efficiency of Cr(VI) ions from water and the effects of pH, contact time, adsorbent dosage, and initial concentration of the Cr(VI) ions were investigated. Results of the study revealed that impregnated CNTs achieved significant increase in the removal efficiency of Cr(VI) ions compared to raw CNTs. In fact, both CNTs impregnated with 10% loading of iron and aluminum oxides were able to remove up to 100% of Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solution. Isotherm studies were carried out using Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. Adsorption kinetics of Cr(VI) ions from water was found to be well described by the pseudo-second-order model. The results suggest that metallic oxide impregnated CNTs have very good potential application in the removal of Cr(VI) ions from water resulting in better environmental protection.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1624243
spellingShingle Muhammad I. Qureshi
Faheemuddin Patel
Nadhir Al-Baghli
Basim Abussaud
Bassam S. Tawabini
Tahar Laoui
A Comparative Study of Raw and Metal Oxide Impregnated Carbon Nanotubes for the Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution
Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications
title A Comparative Study of Raw and Metal Oxide Impregnated Carbon Nanotubes for the Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution
title_full A Comparative Study of Raw and Metal Oxide Impregnated Carbon Nanotubes for the Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Raw and Metal Oxide Impregnated Carbon Nanotubes for the Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Raw and Metal Oxide Impregnated Carbon Nanotubes for the Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution
title_short A Comparative Study of Raw and Metal Oxide Impregnated Carbon Nanotubes for the Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution
title_sort comparative study of raw and metal oxide impregnated carbon nanotubes for the adsorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/1624243
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadiqureshi acomparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution
AT faheemuddinpatel acomparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution
AT nadhiralbaghli acomparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution
AT basimabussaud acomparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution
AT bassamstawabini acomparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution
AT taharlaoui acomparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution
AT muhammadiqureshi comparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution
AT faheemuddinpatel comparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution
AT nadhiralbaghli comparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution
AT basimabussaud comparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution
AT bassamstawabini comparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution
AT taharlaoui comparativestudyofrawandmetaloxideimpregnatedcarbonnanotubesfortheadsorptionofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueoussolution