THE NATURAL STANDPOINT AND SCHÜTZ’S SOCIAL WORLD
The Natural Standpoint allows for two possible ways of treating the social world: the first, to take it as a finished product for passive investigation, and the second, to take it as a place of action. The chance to overstep the sharp distinction between social observer and social actor is exluded....
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vilnius University Press
1997-01-01
|
Series: | Problemos |
Online Access: | https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/4276 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832592985957597184 |
---|---|
author | Nerija Putinaitė |
author_facet | Nerija Putinaitė |
author_sort | Nerija Putinaitė |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
The Natural Standpoint allows for two possible ways of treating the social world: the first, to take it as a finished product for passive investigation, and the second, to take it as a place of action. The chance to overstep the sharp distinction between social observer and social actor is exluded. Schütz’s phenomenological sociology presents the third way, reconciling these two positions. The social world is not merely a finished and (only) observable construction, nor a space of unreflective action. It is continuously in the process of creation, executed by active social observers.
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-2c1fc999aeac44e0ac0bc0b451888818 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1392-1126 2424-6158 |
language | English |
publishDate | 1997-01-01 |
publisher | Vilnius University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Problemos |
spelling | doaj-art-2c1fc999aeac44e0ac0bc0b4518888182025-01-20T18:25:36ZengVilnius University PressProblemos1392-11262424-61581997-01-0151THE NATURAL STANDPOINT AND SCHÜTZ’S SOCIAL WORLDNerija Putinaitė The Natural Standpoint allows for two possible ways of treating the social world: the first, to take it as a finished product for passive investigation, and the second, to take it as a place of action. The chance to overstep the sharp distinction between social observer and social actor is exluded. Schütz’s phenomenological sociology presents the third way, reconciling these two positions. The social world is not merely a finished and (only) observable construction, nor a space of unreflective action. It is continuously in the process of creation, executed by active social observers. https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/4276 |
spellingShingle | Nerija Putinaitė THE NATURAL STANDPOINT AND SCHÜTZ’S SOCIAL WORLD Problemos |
title | THE NATURAL STANDPOINT AND SCHÜTZ’S SOCIAL WORLD |
title_full | THE NATURAL STANDPOINT AND SCHÜTZ’S SOCIAL WORLD |
title_fullStr | THE NATURAL STANDPOINT AND SCHÜTZ’S SOCIAL WORLD |
title_full_unstemmed | THE NATURAL STANDPOINT AND SCHÜTZ’S SOCIAL WORLD |
title_short | THE NATURAL STANDPOINT AND SCHÜTZ’S SOCIAL WORLD |
title_sort | natural standpoint and schutz s social world |
url | https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/4276 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nerijaputinaite thenaturalstandpointandschutzssocialworld AT nerijaputinaite naturalstandpointandschutzssocialworld |