Analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of grassland carbon sinks in Xinjiang via the improved CASA model

Accurate assessment of grassland carbon sinks provides scientific data for quantifying the global carbon balance. Currently, methods for precisely calculating NPP (net primary productivity) and NEP (net ecosystem productivity) in arid grasslands are limited, and the changes in NEP and their driving...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuewei Liu, Renping Zhang, Jing Guo, Haoen Xu, Yuhao Miao, Feifei Niu, Zhengjie Gao, Xiaming Yang, Fengqin Xiong, Jianli Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Ecological Indicators
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2401519X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576461512376320
author Xuewei Liu
Renping Zhang
Jing Guo
Haoen Xu
Yuhao Miao
Feifei Niu
Zhengjie Gao
Xiaming Yang
Fengqin Xiong
Jianli Zhang
author_facet Xuewei Liu
Renping Zhang
Jing Guo
Haoen Xu
Yuhao Miao
Feifei Niu
Zhengjie Gao
Xiaming Yang
Fengqin Xiong
Jianli Zhang
author_sort Xuewei Liu
collection DOAJ
description Accurate assessment of grassland carbon sinks provides scientific data for quantifying the global carbon balance. Currently, methods for precisely calculating NPP (net primary productivity) and NEP (net ecosystem productivity) in arid grasslands are limited, and the changes in NEP and their driving mechanisms remain unclear. This study optimized LUEmax (maximum light use efficiency) and Wε (water stress coefficient) in the CASA (Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach) model and developed eight improved CASA model configurations. NEP was calculated as the difference between the NPP estimated by the optimal CASA model and soil heterotrophic respiration (Rh). The changes in grassland NPP and NEP from 2000 to 2022 and the effects of different factors on grassland NEP were explored. The analysis revealed that (1) the R2 value of the optimal CASA model was 0.70, and the RMSE was 22.30 gC·m−2. (2) The 23-year average NEP in Xinjiang grassland was 113.00 gC·m−2·a−1, with 82.20 % carbon sink areas and 17.80 % carbon source areas. (3) NEPs of meadows, steppes, and desert grasslands in the Xinjiang region tended to increase during spring, summer, and autumn. (4) During the 23-year period, 15.77 % of the Xinjiang grassland area transitioned from carbon sources to carbon sinks. (5) Relative humidity and soil pH strongly influenced the NEP of Xinjiang grassland. This study provides a more accurate model for calculating NPP and estimating the variation in carbon source and carbon sink areas in arid grasslands, providing theoretical guidance for the development of grassland management policies.
format Article
id doaj-art-2bb7706a43c34e14ac1b61fec342cb44
institution Kabale University
issn 1470-160X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Ecological Indicators
spelling doaj-art-2bb7706a43c34e14ac1b61fec342cb442025-01-31T05:10:44ZengElsevierEcological Indicators1470-160X2025-01-01170113062Analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of grassland carbon sinks in Xinjiang via the improved CASA modelXuewei Liu0Renping Zhang1Jing Guo2Haoen Xu3Yuhao Miao4Feifei Niu5Zhengjie Gao6Xiaming Yang7Fengqin Xiong8Jianli Zhang9College of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China; Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, ChinaCollege of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China; Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China; Corresponding author at: College of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China.Xinjiang Academy of Forestry Sciences, Urumqi 830000, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaCollege of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China; Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, ChinaCollege of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China; Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, ChinaCollege of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China; Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, ChinaCollege of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China; Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, ChinaCollege of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China; Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, ChinaXinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Grassland General Station, Urumqi, 830000, ChinaAccurate assessment of grassland carbon sinks provides scientific data for quantifying the global carbon balance. Currently, methods for precisely calculating NPP (net primary productivity) and NEP (net ecosystem productivity) in arid grasslands are limited, and the changes in NEP and their driving mechanisms remain unclear. This study optimized LUEmax (maximum light use efficiency) and Wε (water stress coefficient) in the CASA (Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach) model and developed eight improved CASA model configurations. NEP was calculated as the difference between the NPP estimated by the optimal CASA model and soil heterotrophic respiration (Rh). The changes in grassland NPP and NEP from 2000 to 2022 and the effects of different factors on grassland NEP were explored. The analysis revealed that (1) the R2 value of the optimal CASA model was 0.70, and the RMSE was 22.30 gC·m−2. (2) The 23-year average NEP in Xinjiang grassland was 113.00 gC·m−2·a−1, with 82.20 % carbon sink areas and 17.80 % carbon source areas. (3) NEPs of meadows, steppes, and desert grasslands in the Xinjiang region tended to increase during spring, summer, and autumn. (4) During the 23-year period, 15.77 % of the Xinjiang grassland area transitioned from carbon sources to carbon sinks. (5) Relative humidity and soil pH strongly influenced the NEP of Xinjiang grassland. This study provides a more accurate model for calculating NPP and estimating the variation in carbon source and carbon sink areas in arid grasslands, providing theoretical guidance for the development of grassland management policies.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2401519XArid and semiarid regionsNet primary productivityNet ecosystem productivityDriving factors
spellingShingle Xuewei Liu
Renping Zhang
Jing Guo
Haoen Xu
Yuhao Miao
Feifei Niu
Zhengjie Gao
Xiaming Yang
Fengqin Xiong
Jianli Zhang
Analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of grassland carbon sinks in Xinjiang via the improved CASA model
Ecological Indicators
Arid and semiarid regions
Net primary productivity
Net ecosystem productivity
Driving factors
title Analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of grassland carbon sinks in Xinjiang via the improved CASA model
title_full Analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of grassland carbon sinks in Xinjiang via the improved CASA model
title_fullStr Analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of grassland carbon sinks in Xinjiang via the improved CASA model
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of grassland carbon sinks in Xinjiang via the improved CASA model
title_short Analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of grassland carbon sinks in Xinjiang via the improved CASA model
title_sort analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of grassland carbon sinks in xinjiang via the improved casa model
topic Arid and semiarid regions
Net primary productivity
Net ecosystem productivity
Driving factors
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2401519X
work_keys_str_mv AT xueweiliu analysisofthespatiotemporaldynamicsofgrasslandcarbonsinksinxinjiangviatheimprovedcasamodel
AT renpingzhang analysisofthespatiotemporaldynamicsofgrasslandcarbonsinksinxinjiangviatheimprovedcasamodel
AT jingguo analysisofthespatiotemporaldynamicsofgrasslandcarbonsinksinxinjiangviatheimprovedcasamodel
AT haoenxu analysisofthespatiotemporaldynamicsofgrasslandcarbonsinksinxinjiangviatheimprovedcasamodel
AT yuhaomiao analysisofthespatiotemporaldynamicsofgrasslandcarbonsinksinxinjiangviatheimprovedcasamodel
AT feifeiniu analysisofthespatiotemporaldynamicsofgrasslandcarbonsinksinxinjiangviatheimprovedcasamodel
AT zhengjiegao analysisofthespatiotemporaldynamicsofgrasslandcarbonsinksinxinjiangviatheimprovedcasamodel
AT xiamingyang analysisofthespatiotemporaldynamicsofgrasslandcarbonsinksinxinjiangviatheimprovedcasamodel
AT fengqinxiong analysisofthespatiotemporaldynamicsofgrasslandcarbonsinksinxinjiangviatheimprovedcasamodel
AT jianlizhang analysisofthespatiotemporaldynamicsofgrasslandcarbonsinksinxinjiangviatheimprovedcasamodel