Compaction of Hyaloclastite from the Active Geothermal System at Krafla Volcano, Iceland

Hyaloclastites commonly form high-quality reservoir rocks in volcanic geothermal provinces. Here, we investigated the effects of confinement due to burial following prolonged accumulation of eruptive products on the physical and mechanical evolution of surficial and subsurface (depths of 70 m, 556 m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guðjón H. Eggertsson, Jackie E. Kendrick, Joshua Weaver, Paul A. Wallace, James E. P. Utley, John D. Bedford, Michael J. Allen, Sigurður H. Markússon, Richard H. Worden, Daniel R. Faulkner, Yan Lavallée
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Geofluids
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3878503
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832547692053528576
author Guðjón H. Eggertsson
Jackie E. Kendrick
Joshua Weaver
Paul A. Wallace
James E. P. Utley
John D. Bedford
Michael J. Allen
Sigurður H. Markússon
Richard H. Worden
Daniel R. Faulkner
Yan Lavallée
author_facet Guðjón H. Eggertsson
Jackie E. Kendrick
Joshua Weaver
Paul A. Wallace
James E. P. Utley
John D. Bedford
Michael J. Allen
Sigurður H. Markússon
Richard H. Worden
Daniel R. Faulkner
Yan Lavallée
author_sort Guðjón H. Eggertsson
collection DOAJ
description Hyaloclastites commonly form high-quality reservoir rocks in volcanic geothermal provinces. Here, we investigated the effects of confinement due to burial following prolonged accumulation of eruptive products on the physical and mechanical evolution of surficial and subsurface (depths of 70 m, 556 m, and 732 m) hyaloclastites from Krafla volcano, Iceland. Upon loading in a hydrostatic cell, the porosity and permeability of the surficial hyaloclastite decreased linearly with mean effective stress, as pores and cracks closed due to elastic (recoverable) compaction up to 22-24 MPa (equivalent to ~1.3 km depth in the reservoir). Beyond this mean effective stress, denoted as P∗, we observed accelerated porosity and permeability reduction with increasing confinement, as the rock underwent permanent inelastic compaction. In comparison, the porosity and permeability of the subsurface core samples were less sensitive to mean effective stress, decreasing linearly with increasing confinement as the samples compacted elastically within the conditions tested (to 40 MPa). Although the surficial material underwent permanent, destructive compaction, it maintained higher porosity and permeability than the subsurface hyaloclastites throughout the experiments. We constrained the evolution of yield curves of the hyaloclastites, subjected to different effective mean stresses in a triaxial press. Surficial hyaloclastites underwent a brittle-ductile transition at an effective mean stress of ~10.5 MPa, and peak strength (differential stress) reached 13 MPa. When loaded to effective mean stresses of 33 and 40 MPa, the rocks compacted, producing new yield curves with a brittle-ductile transition at ~12.5 and ~19 MPa, respectively, but showed limited strength increase. In comparison, the subsurface samples were found to be much stronger, displaying higher strengths and brittle-ductile transitions at higher effective mean stresses (i.e., 37.5 MPa for 70 m sample, >75 MPa for 556 m, and 68.5 MPa for 732 m) that correspond to their lower porosities and permeabilities. Thus, we conclude that compaction upon burial alone is insufficient to explain the physical and mechanical properties of the subsurface hyaloclastites present in the reservoir at Krafla volcano. Mineralogical alteration, quantified using SEM-EDS, is invoked to explain the further reduction of porosity and increase in strength of the hyaloclastite in the active geothermal system at Krafla.
format Article
id doaj-art-2b98ecac4e9843e6b250008fee7f650d
institution Kabale University
issn 1468-8115
1468-8123
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geofluids
spelling doaj-art-2b98ecac4e9843e6b250008fee7f650d2025-02-03T06:43:37ZengWileyGeofluids1468-81151468-81232020-01-01202010.1155/2020/38785033878503Compaction of Hyaloclastite from the Active Geothermal System at Krafla Volcano, IcelandGuðjón H. Eggertsson0Jackie E. Kendrick1Joshua Weaver2Paul A. Wallace3James E. P. Utley4John D. Bedford5Michael J. Allen6Sigurður H. Markússon7Richard H. Worden8Daniel R. Faulkner9Yan Lavallée10Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UKDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UKDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UKDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UKDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UKDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UKDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UKLandsvirkjun, Háaleitisbraut 68, 103 Reykjavík, IcelandDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UKDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UKDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GP, UKHyaloclastites commonly form high-quality reservoir rocks in volcanic geothermal provinces. Here, we investigated the effects of confinement due to burial following prolonged accumulation of eruptive products on the physical and mechanical evolution of surficial and subsurface (depths of 70 m, 556 m, and 732 m) hyaloclastites from Krafla volcano, Iceland. Upon loading in a hydrostatic cell, the porosity and permeability of the surficial hyaloclastite decreased linearly with mean effective stress, as pores and cracks closed due to elastic (recoverable) compaction up to 22-24 MPa (equivalent to ~1.3 km depth in the reservoir). Beyond this mean effective stress, denoted as P∗, we observed accelerated porosity and permeability reduction with increasing confinement, as the rock underwent permanent inelastic compaction. In comparison, the porosity and permeability of the subsurface core samples were less sensitive to mean effective stress, decreasing linearly with increasing confinement as the samples compacted elastically within the conditions tested (to 40 MPa). Although the surficial material underwent permanent, destructive compaction, it maintained higher porosity and permeability than the subsurface hyaloclastites throughout the experiments. We constrained the evolution of yield curves of the hyaloclastites, subjected to different effective mean stresses in a triaxial press. Surficial hyaloclastites underwent a brittle-ductile transition at an effective mean stress of ~10.5 MPa, and peak strength (differential stress) reached 13 MPa. When loaded to effective mean stresses of 33 and 40 MPa, the rocks compacted, producing new yield curves with a brittle-ductile transition at ~12.5 and ~19 MPa, respectively, but showed limited strength increase. In comparison, the subsurface samples were found to be much stronger, displaying higher strengths and brittle-ductile transitions at higher effective mean stresses (i.e., 37.5 MPa for 70 m sample, >75 MPa for 556 m, and 68.5 MPa for 732 m) that correspond to their lower porosities and permeabilities. Thus, we conclude that compaction upon burial alone is insufficient to explain the physical and mechanical properties of the subsurface hyaloclastites present in the reservoir at Krafla volcano. Mineralogical alteration, quantified using SEM-EDS, is invoked to explain the further reduction of porosity and increase in strength of the hyaloclastite in the active geothermal system at Krafla.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3878503
spellingShingle Guðjón H. Eggertsson
Jackie E. Kendrick
Joshua Weaver
Paul A. Wallace
James E. P. Utley
John D. Bedford
Michael J. Allen
Sigurður H. Markússon
Richard H. Worden
Daniel R. Faulkner
Yan Lavallée
Compaction of Hyaloclastite from the Active Geothermal System at Krafla Volcano, Iceland
Geofluids
title Compaction of Hyaloclastite from the Active Geothermal System at Krafla Volcano, Iceland
title_full Compaction of Hyaloclastite from the Active Geothermal System at Krafla Volcano, Iceland
title_fullStr Compaction of Hyaloclastite from the Active Geothermal System at Krafla Volcano, Iceland
title_full_unstemmed Compaction of Hyaloclastite from the Active Geothermal System at Krafla Volcano, Iceland
title_short Compaction of Hyaloclastite from the Active Geothermal System at Krafla Volcano, Iceland
title_sort compaction of hyaloclastite from the active geothermal system at krafla volcano iceland
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/3878503
work_keys_str_mv AT guðjonheggertsson compactionofhyaloclastitefromtheactivegeothermalsystematkraflavolcanoiceland
AT jackieekendrick compactionofhyaloclastitefromtheactivegeothermalsystematkraflavolcanoiceland
AT joshuaweaver compactionofhyaloclastitefromtheactivegeothermalsystematkraflavolcanoiceland
AT paulawallace compactionofhyaloclastitefromtheactivegeothermalsystematkraflavolcanoiceland
AT jameseputley compactionofhyaloclastitefromtheactivegeothermalsystematkraflavolcanoiceland
AT johndbedford compactionofhyaloclastitefromtheactivegeothermalsystematkraflavolcanoiceland
AT michaeljallen compactionofhyaloclastitefromtheactivegeothermalsystematkraflavolcanoiceland
AT sigurðurhmarkusson compactionofhyaloclastitefromtheactivegeothermalsystematkraflavolcanoiceland
AT richardhworden compactionofhyaloclastitefromtheactivegeothermalsystematkraflavolcanoiceland
AT danielrfaulkner compactionofhyaloclastitefromtheactivegeothermalsystematkraflavolcanoiceland
AT yanlavallee compactionofhyaloclastitefromtheactivegeothermalsystematkraflavolcanoiceland