Measurement model of readiness for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs

Purpose – This study aims to develop a model for readiness measurement and to study readiness levels for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs. Design/methodology/approach – In total, 870 undergraduate students enrolled in the 2022 academic year of a Thai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thanyasinee Laosum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2024-09-01
Series:AAOU Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2024-0007/full/pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850059125126332416
author Thanyasinee Laosum
author_facet Thanyasinee Laosum
author_sort Thanyasinee Laosum
collection DOAJ
description Purpose – This study aims to develop a model for readiness measurement and to study readiness levels for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs. Design/methodology/approach – In total, 870 undergraduate students enrolled in the 2022 academic year of a Thai university were sampled for the study. The samples were divided into two groups: Group 1 comprised 432 students who underwent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Group 2 comprised 438 students who underwent second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Both were multi-stage random samples. Descriptive statistics, item-total correlations (ITCs), coefficient correlations, EFA and second-order CFA were used. Findings – The readiness for the online testing model comprised 5 factors and 33 indicators. These included self-efficacy (SE) in utilizing technology (nine indicators), self-directed learning (SL) for readiness testing (six indicators), adequacy of technology (AT) for testing (five indicators), acceptance of online testing (AC) (seven indicators) and readiness training for testing (six indicators). The model was congruent with empirical data, and the survey results indicated that students were highly prepared at the “high” level. Practical implications – This study disclosed several factors and indicators involved in the readiness for online testing. The university may use these findings in preparing its students for online testing for better achievement. Originality/value – These findings may serve as a framework for the analysis of the readiness issues for online testing of undergraduate students and also offer guidance to the universities preparing to offer online testing.
format Article
id doaj-art-2b4529e48a2b48d19f51a3a9c3171ff4
institution DOAJ
issn 1858-3431
2414-6994
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher Emerald Publishing
record_format Article
series AAOU Journal
spelling doaj-art-2b4529e48a2b48d19f51a3a9c3171ff42025-08-20T02:50:59ZengEmerald PublishingAAOU Journal1858-34312414-69942024-09-0119218620110.1108/AAOUJ-01-2024-0007Measurement model of readiness for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programsThanyasinee Laosum0Office of Registration, Records and Evaluation, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Nonthaburi, ThailandPurpose – This study aims to develop a model for readiness measurement and to study readiness levels for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs. Design/methodology/approach – In total, 870 undergraduate students enrolled in the 2022 academic year of a Thai university were sampled for the study. The samples were divided into two groups: Group 1 comprised 432 students who underwent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Group 2 comprised 438 students who underwent second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Both were multi-stage random samples. Descriptive statistics, item-total correlations (ITCs), coefficient correlations, EFA and second-order CFA were used. Findings – The readiness for the online testing model comprised 5 factors and 33 indicators. These included self-efficacy (SE) in utilizing technology (nine indicators), self-directed learning (SL) for readiness testing (six indicators), adequacy of technology (AT) for testing (five indicators), acceptance of online testing (AC) (seven indicators) and readiness training for testing (six indicators). The model was congruent with empirical data, and the survey results indicated that students were highly prepared at the “high” level. Practical implications – This study disclosed several factors and indicators involved in the readiness for online testing. The university may use these findings in preparing its students for online testing for better achievement. Originality/value – These findings may serve as a framework for the analysis of the readiness issues for online testing of undergraduate students and also offer guidance to the universities preparing to offer online testing.https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2024-0007/full/pdfDistance educationDistance education in ThailandMeasurement modelOnline testingReadiness for online testingUndergraduate students
spellingShingle Thanyasinee Laosum
Measurement model of readiness for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs
AAOU Journal
Distance education
Distance education in Thailand
Measurement model
Online testing
Readiness for online testing
Undergraduate students
title Measurement model of readiness for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs
title_full Measurement model of readiness for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs
title_fullStr Measurement model of readiness for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs
title_full_unstemmed Measurement model of readiness for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs
title_short Measurement model of readiness for online testing of undergraduate students in Thailand’s distance education programs
title_sort measurement model of readiness for online testing of undergraduate students in thailand s distance education programs
topic Distance education
Distance education in Thailand
Measurement model
Online testing
Readiness for online testing
Undergraduate students
url https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2024-0007/full/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT thanyasineelaosum measurementmodelofreadinessforonlinetestingofundergraduatestudentsinthailandsdistanceeducationprograms