Development of novel thoracic retractor for resuscitative thoracotomy

Abstract Background Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is a critical intervention for patients in traumatic cardiac arrest or hemorrhagic shock, where survival is highly dependent on the time required to perform the procedure. Despite its urgency, RT is still conducted using traditional thoracic retract...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shoichiro Urabe, Junya Shimazaki, Tomohisa Izutani, Tsuyoshi Hata, Mamoru Uemura, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yuichiro Doki, Kiyokazu Nakajima
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-06-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01423-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850111672886231040
author Shoichiro Urabe
Junya Shimazaki
Tomohisa Izutani
Tsuyoshi Hata
Mamoru Uemura
Hidetoshi Eguchi
Yuichiro Doki
Kiyokazu Nakajima
author_facet Shoichiro Urabe
Junya Shimazaki
Tomohisa Izutani
Tsuyoshi Hata
Mamoru Uemura
Hidetoshi Eguchi
Yuichiro Doki
Kiyokazu Nakajima
author_sort Shoichiro Urabe
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is a critical intervention for patients in traumatic cardiac arrest or hemorrhagic shock, where survival is highly dependent on the time required to perform the procedure. Despite its urgency, RT is still conducted using traditional thoracic retractors originally designed for scheduled surgeries, which pose challenges in emergency settings. To address these limitations, we developed a novel thoracic retractor optimized for RT and evaluated its performance compared to a conventional model. Methods The novel retractor was designed with an arrow-shaped hook for improved intercostal insertion and a continuously rotatable handle to enhance procedural efficiency. A comparative study using excised porcine thoraxes was conducted to assess its performance. Six cm incisions were made in the intercostal spaces bilaterally before retractor insertion. Evaluators inserted the device, performed three handle rotations, and repeated the procedure using the other retractor on the contralateral side. The primary outcome was the time required for three rotations, while secondary outcomes included ease of insertion, ease of rotation, and hook stability, rated on a 6-point scale by evaluators. Results Ten surgeons (n = 10) performed thoracotomy using both the novel and conventional retractors. Comparison of the time required for three handle rotations between the novel and conventional retractors demonstrated a statistically significant reduction with the novel retractor. The median time to complete three rotations was 16.0 [11.7–19.1] seconds with the novel retractor, compared to 7.0 [5.3–8.5] seconds with the conventional model (P < 0.01). The ease of insertion was rated significantly higher with the novel retractor compared to the conventional model (6.0 [5.5–6.0] vs. 2.5 [2.0–3.0], P < 0.01). The ease of rotation was also rated significantly higher with the novel retractor than with the conventional model (5.5 [5.0–6.0] vs. 2.5 [1.0–3.5], P < 0.01). In the evaluation of the hook stability, no significant difference was observed between the novel and conventional retractors (P = 1.0). Conclusions The novel thoracic retractor enables faster and easier thoracotomy compared to conventional model. Given the strong association between time and RT prognosis, this device is well-suited for RT procedures requiring rapid execution.
format Article
id doaj-art-299f6b68d21145b2921232ab6b884709
institution OA Journals
issn 1757-7241
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj-art-299f6b68d21145b2921232ab6b8847092025-08-20T02:37:35ZengBMCScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine1757-72412025-06-013311710.1186/s13049-025-01423-1Development of novel thoracic retractor for resuscitative thoracotomyShoichiro Urabe0Junya Shimazaki1Tomohisa Izutani2Tsuyoshi Hata3Mamoru Uemura4Hidetoshi Eguchi5Yuichiro Doki6Kiyokazu Nakajima7Department of Next Generation Endoscopic Intervention (Project ENGINE), Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka UniversityDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kansai Medical UniversityKajitech Medical Co., LtdDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka UniversityDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka UniversityDepartment of Next Generation Endoscopic Intervention (Project ENGINE), Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka UniversityAbstract Background Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is a critical intervention for patients in traumatic cardiac arrest or hemorrhagic shock, where survival is highly dependent on the time required to perform the procedure. Despite its urgency, RT is still conducted using traditional thoracic retractors originally designed for scheduled surgeries, which pose challenges in emergency settings. To address these limitations, we developed a novel thoracic retractor optimized for RT and evaluated its performance compared to a conventional model. Methods The novel retractor was designed with an arrow-shaped hook for improved intercostal insertion and a continuously rotatable handle to enhance procedural efficiency. A comparative study using excised porcine thoraxes was conducted to assess its performance. Six cm incisions were made in the intercostal spaces bilaterally before retractor insertion. Evaluators inserted the device, performed three handle rotations, and repeated the procedure using the other retractor on the contralateral side. The primary outcome was the time required for three rotations, while secondary outcomes included ease of insertion, ease of rotation, and hook stability, rated on a 6-point scale by evaluators. Results Ten surgeons (n = 10) performed thoracotomy using both the novel and conventional retractors. Comparison of the time required for three handle rotations between the novel and conventional retractors demonstrated a statistically significant reduction with the novel retractor. The median time to complete three rotations was 16.0 [11.7–19.1] seconds with the novel retractor, compared to 7.0 [5.3–8.5] seconds with the conventional model (P < 0.01). The ease of insertion was rated significantly higher with the novel retractor compared to the conventional model (6.0 [5.5–6.0] vs. 2.5 [2.0–3.0], P < 0.01). The ease of rotation was also rated significantly higher with the novel retractor than with the conventional model (5.5 [5.0–6.0] vs. 2.5 [1.0–3.5], P < 0.01). In the evaluation of the hook stability, no significant difference was observed between the novel and conventional retractors (P = 1.0). Conclusions The novel thoracic retractor enables faster and easier thoracotomy compared to conventional model. Given the strong association between time and RT prognosis, this device is well-suited for RT procedures requiring rapid execution.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01423-1Thoracic retractorRib retractorRib spreaderResuscitative thoracotomyResuscitationThoracotomy
spellingShingle Shoichiro Urabe
Junya Shimazaki
Tomohisa Izutani
Tsuyoshi Hata
Mamoru Uemura
Hidetoshi Eguchi
Yuichiro Doki
Kiyokazu Nakajima
Development of novel thoracic retractor for resuscitative thoracotomy
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Thoracic retractor
Rib retractor
Rib spreader
Resuscitative thoracotomy
Resuscitation
Thoracotomy
title Development of novel thoracic retractor for resuscitative thoracotomy
title_full Development of novel thoracic retractor for resuscitative thoracotomy
title_fullStr Development of novel thoracic retractor for resuscitative thoracotomy
title_full_unstemmed Development of novel thoracic retractor for resuscitative thoracotomy
title_short Development of novel thoracic retractor for resuscitative thoracotomy
title_sort development of novel thoracic retractor for resuscitative thoracotomy
topic Thoracic retractor
Rib retractor
Rib spreader
Resuscitative thoracotomy
Resuscitation
Thoracotomy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01423-1
work_keys_str_mv AT shoichirourabe developmentofnovelthoracicretractorforresuscitativethoracotomy
AT junyashimazaki developmentofnovelthoracicretractorforresuscitativethoracotomy
AT tomohisaizutani developmentofnovelthoracicretractorforresuscitativethoracotomy
AT tsuyoshihata developmentofnovelthoracicretractorforresuscitativethoracotomy
AT mamoruuemura developmentofnovelthoracicretractorforresuscitativethoracotomy
AT hidetoshieguchi developmentofnovelthoracicretractorforresuscitativethoracotomy
AT yuichirodoki developmentofnovelthoracicretractorforresuscitativethoracotomy
AT kiyokazunakajima developmentofnovelthoracicretractorforresuscitativethoracotomy