Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia

Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common regional anesthesia used to provide surgical anesthesia for cesarean section. Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms experienced by patients undergoing cesarean section. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vankudoth Bhaskar, Jitendra Agrawal, Ankita Gupta, Ashish Mohan M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara 2025-02-01
Series:Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4394
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575414788161536
author Vankudoth Bhaskar
Jitendra Agrawal
Ankita Gupta
Ashish Mohan M
author_facet Vankudoth Bhaskar
Jitendra Agrawal
Ankita Gupta
Ashish Mohan M
author_sort Vankudoth Bhaskar
collection DOAJ
description Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common regional anesthesia used to provide surgical anesthesia for cesarean section. Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms experienced by patients undergoing cesarean section. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and palonosetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted on total 90 patients undergoing cesarean section, divided in three groups of 30 patients each. Group O received 4 mg ondansetron i.v., Group P received palonosetron 075 mg i.v and Group D received 8 mg dexamethasone i.v. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was compared between the groups and side effects were assessed. Results: Antiemetic prophylaxis reduced the overall incidence of nausea and vomiting. However, Palonosetron had a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting as compared to dexamethasone and ondansetron. Conclusion: Our study concluded that Palonosetron had the lowest incidence of nausea and vomiting.
format Article
id doaj-art-298181b37e8c4b839343e4b6098d15f4
institution Kabale University
issn 2467-9100
2091-0576
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj-art-298181b37e8c4b839343e4b6098d15f42025-02-01T08:19:34ZengManipal College of Medical Sciences, PokharaAsian Journal of Medical Sciences2467-91002091-05762025-02-011623844https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v16i2.4394Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesiaVankudoth Bhaskar 0https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8387-9998Jitendra Agrawal 1https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2470-4761Ankita Gupta 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3303-988XAshish Mohan M3https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7660-1141Postgraduate Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India Former Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India Postgraduate Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common regional anesthesia used to provide surgical anesthesia for cesarean section. Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms experienced by patients undergoing cesarean section. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and palonosetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted on total 90 patients undergoing cesarean section, divided in three groups of 30 patients each. Group O received 4 mg ondansetron i.v., Group P received palonosetron 075 mg i.v and Group D received 8 mg dexamethasone i.v. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was compared between the groups and side effects were assessed. Results: Antiemetic prophylaxis reduced the overall incidence of nausea and vomiting. However, Palonosetron had a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting as compared to dexamethasone and ondansetron. Conclusion: Our study concluded that Palonosetron had the lowest incidence of nausea and vomiting.https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4394ondansetron; palonosetron; dexamethasone; cesarean section
spellingShingle Vankudoth Bhaskar
Jitendra Agrawal
Ankita Gupta
Ashish Mohan M
Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
ondansetron; palonosetron; dexamethasone; cesarean section
title Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
title_full Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
title_short Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
title_sort comparative evaluation of ondansetron palonosetron and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
topic ondansetron; palonosetron; dexamethasone; cesarean section
url https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4394
work_keys_str_mv AT vankudothbhaskar comparativeevaluationofondansetronpalonosetronanddexamethasoneforantiemeticprophylaxisincesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesia
AT jitendraagrawal comparativeevaluationofondansetronpalonosetronanddexamethasoneforantiemeticprophylaxisincesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesia
AT ankitagupta comparativeevaluationofondansetronpalonosetronanddexamethasoneforantiemeticprophylaxisincesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesia
AT ashishmohanm comparativeevaluationofondansetronpalonosetronanddexamethasoneforantiemeticprophylaxisincesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesia