Do auxiliaire ou do lexical? Indifférenciation sémantique et/ou syntaxique en contexte anaphorique
This paper uncovers the specific properties of “which NP do”, “that NP do” and “this NP do” constructions. Based on a thorough analysis of electronic corpora, it lays bare a factitive meaning shared by the various forms of the verb do, provided the latter takes some complementation (verbal in the ca...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Presses Universitaires du Midi
2013-10-01
|
| Series: | Anglophonia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/acs/12666 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832579223215144960 |
|---|---|
| author | Saghie Sharifzadeh |
| author_facet | Saghie Sharifzadeh |
| author_sort | Saghie Sharifzadeh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper uncovers the specific properties of “which NP do”, “that NP do” and “this NP do” constructions. Based on a thorough analysis of electronic corpora, it lays bare a factitive meaning shared by the various forms of the verb do, provided the latter takes some complementation (verbal in the case of auxiliary do, nominal in the case of transitive do). In “which NP do”, “that NP do” and “this NP do” constructions notably, this underlying semantic unity appears to blur the boundary between lexical and grammatical occurrences of the verb do, thus obscuring the syntactic differences between the lexical verb and the auxiliary. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-28bfdad4c66f43cea7815a1de5b91049 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1278-3331 2427-0466 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2013-10-01 |
| publisher | Presses Universitaires du Midi |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Anglophonia |
| spelling | doaj-art-28bfdad4c66f43cea7815a1de5b910492025-01-30T12:33:28ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04662013-10-0117678710.4000/anglophonia.241Do auxiliaire ou do lexical? Indifférenciation sémantique et/ou syntaxique en contexte anaphoriqueSaghie SharifzadehThis paper uncovers the specific properties of “which NP do”, “that NP do” and “this NP do” constructions. Based on a thorough analysis of electronic corpora, it lays bare a factitive meaning shared by the various forms of the verb do, provided the latter takes some complementation (verbal in the case of auxiliary do, nominal in the case of transitive do). In “which NP do”, “that NP do” and “this NP do” constructions notably, this underlying semantic unity appears to blur the boundary between lexical and grammatical occurrences of the verb do, thus obscuring the syntactic differences between the lexical verb and the auxiliary.https://journals.openedition.org/acs/12666anaphoratransitivityauxiliarydifferentiation (lack of)dofronting |
| spellingShingle | Saghie Sharifzadeh Do auxiliaire ou do lexical? Indifférenciation sémantique et/ou syntaxique en contexte anaphorique Anglophonia anaphora transitivity auxiliary differentiation (lack of) do fronting |
| title | Do auxiliaire ou do lexical? Indifférenciation sémantique et/ou syntaxique en contexte anaphorique |
| title_full | Do auxiliaire ou do lexical? Indifférenciation sémantique et/ou syntaxique en contexte anaphorique |
| title_fullStr | Do auxiliaire ou do lexical? Indifférenciation sémantique et/ou syntaxique en contexte anaphorique |
| title_full_unstemmed | Do auxiliaire ou do lexical? Indifférenciation sémantique et/ou syntaxique en contexte anaphorique |
| title_short | Do auxiliaire ou do lexical? Indifférenciation sémantique et/ou syntaxique en contexte anaphorique |
| title_sort | do auxiliaire ou do lexical indifferenciation semantique et ou syntaxique en contexte anaphorique |
| topic | anaphora transitivity auxiliary differentiation (lack of) do fronting |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/acs/12666 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT saghiesharifzadeh doauxiliaireoudolexicalindifferenciationsemantiqueetousyntaxiqueencontexteanaphorique |