Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Supported by Talking Mats: An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility
Background. Some clients with cognitive and communicative impairments after a brain injury are unable to participate in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) without support. The study originates from an assumption that some of these clients are able to participate independently in th...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Occupational Therapy International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9367315 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832550341043814400 |
---|---|
author | Vita Hagelskjær Mette Krohn Pia Susanne Christensen Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen |
author_facet | Vita Hagelskjær Mette Krohn Pia Susanne Christensen Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen |
author_sort | Vita Hagelskjær |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background. Some clients with cognitive and communicative impairments after a brain injury are unable to participate in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) without support. The study originates from an assumption that some of these clients are able to participate independently in the COPM interview by using a visual material. Aim. The aim was to investigate the clinical utility of COPM supported by Talking Mats (TM) for community-based clients with cognitive and communicative impairments. Methods. Six clients (51–60 years) were included. After matching the visual material of TM to COPM, the COPM interview was administered twice with an interval of 10 days, once using TM and once without. Interviews were videotaped and studied by six evaluators. Results. The most obvious benefits of using TM as a supportive tool in the COPM interview were related to the first two steps of the COPM interview. Conclusion. Using TM in the COPM interview with clients with cognitive and communicative impairments after a brain injury is recommended as the basis for goal setting. The present study demonstrates a possibility to include a COPM interview to clients who had not been able to complete a COPM interview and thus start a rehabilitation process in a client-centered manner. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-2846def19c044d61bc19d440a704a60c |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0966-7903 1557-0703 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Occupational Therapy International |
spelling | doaj-art-2846def19c044d61bc19d440a704a60c2025-02-03T06:06:57ZengWileyOccupational Therapy International0966-79031557-07032019-01-01201910.1155/2019/93673159367315Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Supported by Talking Mats: An Evaluation of the Clinical UtilityVita Hagelskjær0Mette Krohn1Pia Susanne Christensen2Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen3VIA University College, Gl. Struervej 1, 7500 Holstebro, DenmarkVIA University College, Gl. Struervej 1, 7500 Holstebro, DenmarkBytoften Living and Activity Center, Bytoften 73, 7400 Herning, DenmarkThe Research Initiative for Activity Studies and Occupational Therapy, Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, JB Winsløwsvej 9A, 5000 Odense, DenmarkBackground. Some clients with cognitive and communicative impairments after a brain injury are unable to participate in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) without support. The study originates from an assumption that some of these clients are able to participate independently in the COPM interview by using a visual material. Aim. The aim was to investigate the clinical utility of COPM supported by Talking Mats (TM) for community-based clients with cognitive and communicative impairments. Methods. Six clients (51–60 years) were included. After matching the visual material of TM to COPM, the COPM interview was administered twice with an interval of 10 days, once using TM and once without. Interviews were videotaped and studied by six evaluators. Results. The most obvious benefits of using TM as a supportive tool in the COPM interview were related to the first two steps of the COPM interview. Conclusion. Using TM in the COPM interview with clients with cognitive and communicative impairments after a brain injury is recommended as the basis for goal setting. The present study demonstrates a possibility to include a COPM interview to clients who had not been able to complete a COPM interview and thus start a rehabilitation process in a client-centered manner.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9367315 |
spellingShingle | Vita Hagelskjær Mette Krohn Pia Susanne Christensen Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Supported by Talking Mats: An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility Occupational Therapy International |
title | Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Supported by Talking Mats: An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility |
title_full | Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Supported by Talking Mats: An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility |
title_fullStr | Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Supported by Talking Mats: An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility |
title_full_unstemmed | Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Supported by Talking Mats: An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility |
title_short | Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Supported by Talking Mats: An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility |
title_sort | canadian occupational performance measure supported by talking mats an evaluation of the clinical utility |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9367315 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vitahagelskjær canadianoccupationalperformancemeasuresupportedbytalkingmatsanevaluationoftheclinicalutility AT mettekrohn canadianoccupationalperformancemeasuresupportedbytalkingmatsanevaluationoftheclinicalutility AT piasusannechristensen canadianoccupationalperformancemeasuresupportedbytalkingmatsanevaluationoftheclinicalutility AT jeanettereffstrupchristensen canadianoccupationalperformancemeasuresupportedbytalkingmatsanevaluationoftheclinicalutility |