Impervious surface cover and number of restaurants shape diet variation in an urban carnivore

Abstract In the past decade, studies have demonstrated that urban and nonurban wildlife populations exhibit differences in foraging behavior and diet. However, little is known about how environmental heterogeneity shapes dietary variation of organisms within cities. We examined the vertebrate prey c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tal Caspi, Monica G. Serrano, Stevi L. Vanderzwan, Janet Kessler, Christopher J. Schell, Benjamin N. Sacks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70152
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582291321257984
author Tal Caspi
Monica G. Serrano
Stevi L. Vanderzwan
Janet Kessler
Christopher J. Schell
Benjamin N. Sacks
author_facet Tal Caspi
Monica G. Serrano
Stevi L. Vanderzwan
Janet Kessler
Christopher J. Schell
Benjamin N. Sacks
author_sort Tal Caspi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In the past decade, studies have demonstrated that urban and nonurban wildlife populations exhibit differences in foraging behavior and diet. However, little is known about how environmental heterogeneity shapes dietary variation of organisms within cities. We examined the vertebrate prey components of diets of coyotes (Canis latrans) in San Francisco to quantify territory‐ and individual‐level dietary differences and determine how within‐city variation in land cover and land use affects coyote diet. We genotyped fecal samples for individual coyote identification and used DNA metabarcoding to quantify diet composition and individual niche differentiation. The highest contributor to coyote diet overall was anthropogenic food followed by small mammals. The most frequently detected species were domestic chicken, pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), domestic pig, and raccoon (Procyon lotor). Diet composition varied significantly across territories and among individuals, with territories explaining most of the variation. Within territories (i.e., family groups), the amount of dietary variation attributed to among‐individual differences increased with green space and decreased with impervious surface cover. The quantity of anthropogenic food in scats also was positively correlated with impervious surface cover, suggesting that coyotes consumed more human food in more urbanized territories. The quantity of invasive, human‐commensal rodents in the diet was positively correlated with the number of food services in a territory. Overall, our results revealed substantial intraspecific variation in coyote diet associated with urban landscape heterogeneity and point to a diversifying effect of urbanization on population diet.
format Article
id doaj-art-27d2374d19b84ff5a2cdd88ff060db39
institution Kabale University
issn 2150-8925
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecosphere
spelling doaj-art-27d2374d19b84ff5a2cdd88ff060db392025-01-30T01:44:38ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252025-01-01161n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.70152Impervious surface cover and number of restaurants shape diet variation in an urban carnivoreTal Caspi0Monica G. Serrano1Stevi L. Vanderzwan2Janet Kessler3Christopher J. Schell4Benjamin N. Sacks5Department of Environmental Science & Policy University of California, Davis Davis California USAMammalian Ecology and Conservation Unit, Veterinary Genetics Laboratory University of California, Davis Davis California USAMammalian Ecology and Conservation Unit, Veterinary Genetics Laboratory University of California, Davis Davis California USAIndependent Researcher San Francisco California USADepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management University of California, Berkeley Berkeley California USAMammalian Ecology and Conservation Unit, Veterinary Genetics Laboratory University of California, Davis Davis California USAAbstract In the past decade, studies have demonstrated that urban and nonurban wildlife populations exhibit differences in foraging behavior and diet. However, little is known about how environmental heterogeneity shapes dietary variation of organisms within cities. We examined the vertebrate prey components of diets of coyotes (Canis latrans) in San Francisco to quantify territory‐ and individual‐level dietary differences and determine how within‐city variation in land cover and land use affects coyote diet. We genotyped fecal samples for individual coyote identification and used DNA metabarcoding to quantify diet composition and individual niche differentiation. The highest contributor to coyote diet overall was anthropogenic food followed by small mammals. The most frequently detected species were domestic chicken, pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), domestic pig, and raccoon (Procyon lotor). Diet composition varied significantly across territories and among individuals, with territories explaining most of the variation. Within territories (i.e., family groups), the amount of dietary variation attributed to among‐individual differences increased with green space and decreased with impervious surface cover. The quantity of anthropogenic food in scats also was positively correlated with impervious surface cover, suggesting that coyotes consumed more human food in more urbanized territories. The quantity of invasive, human‐commensal rodents in the diet was positively correlated with the number of food services in a territory. Overall, our results revealed substantial intraspecific variation in coyote diet associated with urban landscape heterogeneity and point to a diversifying effect of urbanization on population diet.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70152anthropogenic subsidiescoyotefecal DNAmetabarcodingniche variationsocial–ecological system
spellingShingle Tal Caspi
Monica G. Serrano
Stevi L. Vanderzwan
Janet Kessler
Christopher J. Schell
Benjamin N. Sacks
Impervious surface cover and number of restaurants shape diet variation in an urban carnivore
Ecosphere
anthropogenic subsidies
coyote
fecal DNA
metabarcoding
niche variation
social–ecological system
title Impervious surface cover and number of restaurants shape diet variation in an urban carnivore
title_full Impervious surface cover and number of restaurants shape diet variation in an urban carnivore
title_fullStr Impervious surface cover and number of restaurants shape diet variation in an urban carnivore
title_full_unstemmed Impervious surface cover and number of restaurants shape diet variation in an urban carnivore
title_short Impervious surface cover and number of restaurants shape diet variation in an urban carnivore
title_sort impervious surface cover and number of restaurants shape diet variation in an urban carnivore
topic anthropogenic subsidies
coyote
fecal DNA
metabarcoding
niche variation
social–ecological system
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70152
work_keys_str_mv AT talcaspi impervioussurfacecoverandnumberofrestaurantsshapedietvariationinanurbancarnivore
AT monicagserrano impervioussurfacecoverandnumberofrestaurantsshapedietvariationinanurbancarnivore
AT stevilvanderzwan impervioussurfacecoverandnumberofrestaurantsshapedietvariationinanurbancarnivore
AT janetkessler impervioussurfacecoverandnumberofrestaurantsshapedietvariationinanurbancarnivore
AT christopherjschell impervioussurfacecoverandnumberofrestaurantsshapedietvariationinanurbancarnivore
AT benjaminnsacks impervioussurfacecoverandnumberofrestaurantsshapedietvariationinanurbancarnivore