The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Episodic Memory Impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Do Episodic Memory Deficits Identified at Classification Remain Evident When Later Examined with Different Memory Tests?

Previous studies of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have been criticised for using the same battery of neuropsychological tests during classification and longitudinal followup. The key concern is that there is a potential circularity when the same tests are used to identify MCI and then subsequently...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shannon Zofia Klekociuk, Mathew James Summers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Neurology Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/437013
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832557080271126528
author Shannon Zofia Klekociuk
Mathew James Summers
author_facet Shannon Zofia Klekociuk
Mathew James Summers
author_sort Shannon Zofia Klekociuk
collection DOAJ
description Previous studies of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have been criticised for using the same battery of neuropsychological tests during classification and longitudinal followup. The key concern is that there is a potential circularity when the same tests are used to identify MCI and then subsequently monitor change in function over time. The aim of the present study was to examine the evidence of this potential circularity problem. The present study assessed the memory function of 72 MCI participants and 50 healthy controls using an alternate battery of visual and verbal episodic memory tests 9 months following initial comprehensive screening assessment and MCI classification. Individuals who were classified as multiple-domain amnestic MCI (a-MCI+) at screening show a significantly reduced performance in visual and verbal memory function at followup using a completely different battery of valid and reliable tests. Consistent with their initial classification, those identified as nonamnestic MCI (na-MCI) or control at screening demonstrated the highest performance across the memory tasks. The results of the present study indicate that persistent memory deficits remain evident in amnestic MCI subgroups using alternate memory tests, suggesting that the concerns regarding potential circularity of logic may be overstated in MCI research.
format Article
id doaj-art-27844037601e4ede9936d72c7d1b29af
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-1852
2090-1860
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Neurology Research International
spelling doaj-art-27844037601e4ede9936d72c7d1b29af2025-02-03T05:43:32ZengWileyNeurology Research International2090-18522090-18602013-01-01201310.1155/2013/437013437013The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Episodic Memory Impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Do Episodic Memory Deficits Identified at Classification Remain Evident When Later Examined with Different Memory Tests?Shannon Zofia Klekociuk0Mathew James Summers1School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, AustraliaSchool of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, AustraliaPrevious studies of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have been criticised for using the same battery of neuropsychological tests during classification and longitudinal followup. The key concern is that there is a potential circularity when the same tests are used to identify MCI and then subsequently monitor change in function over time. The aim of the present study was to examine the evidence of this potential circularity problem. The present study assessed the memory function of 72 MCI participants and 50 healthy controls using an alternate battery of visual and verbal episodic memory tests 9 months following initial comprehensive screening assessment and MCI classification. Individuals who were classified as multiple-domain amnestic MCI (a-MCI+) at screening show a significantly reduced performance in visual and verbal memory function at followup using a completely different battery of valid and reliable tests. Consistent with their initial classification, those identified as nonamnestic MCI (na-MCI) or control at screening demonstrated the highest performance across the memory tasks. The results of the present study indicate that persistent memory deficits remain evident in amnestic MCI subgroups using alternate memory tests, suggesting that the concerns regarding potential circularity of logic may be overstated in MCI research.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/437013
spellingShingle Shannon Zofia Klekociuk
Mathew James Summers
The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Episodic Memory Impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Do Episodic Memory Deficits Identified at Classification Remain Evident When Later Examined with Different Memory Tests?
Neurology Research International
title The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Episodic Memory Impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Do Episodic Memory Deficits Identified at Classification Remain Evident When Later Examined with Different Memory Tests?
title_full The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Episodic Memory Impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Do Episodic Memory Deficits Identified at Classification Remain Evident When Later Examined with Different Memory Tests?
title_fullStr The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Episodic Memory Impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Do Episodic Memory Deficits Identified at Classification Remain Evident When Later Examined with Different Memory Tests?
title_full_unstemmed The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Episodic Memory Impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Do Episodic Memory Deficits Identified at Classification Remain Evident When Later Examined with Different Memory Tests?
title_short The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Episodic Memory Impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Do Episodic Memory Deficits Identified at Classification Remain Evident When Later Examined with Different Memory Tests?
title_sort self fulfilling prophecy of episodic memory impairment in mild cognitive impairment do episodic memory deficits identified at classification remain evident when later examined with different memory tests
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/437013
work_keys_str_mv AT shannonzofiaklekociuk theselffulfillingprophecyofepisodicmemoryimpairmentinmildcognitiveimpairmentdoepisodicmemorydeficitsidentifiedatclassificationremainevidentwhenlaterexaminedwithdifferentmemorytests
AT mathewjamessummers theselffulfillingprophecyofepisodicmemoryimpairmentinmildcognitiveimpairmentdoepisodicmemorydeficitsidentifiedatclassificationremainevidentwhenlaterexaminedwithdifferentmemorytests
AT shannonzofiaklekociuk selffulfillingprophecyofepisodicmemoryimpairmentinmildcognitiveimpairmentdoepisodicmemorydeficitsidentifiedatclassificationremainevidentwhenlaterexaminedwithdifferentmemorytests
AT mathewjamessummers selffulfillingprophecyofepisodicmemoryimpairmentinmildcognitiveimpairmentdoepisodicmemorydeficitsidentifiedatclassificationremainevidentwhenlaterexaminedwithdifferentmemorytests