The Influence of the Farming System and Forecrop on the Yield and Chemical and Health-Promoting Composition of Spring Wheat Grain

Spring wheat was grown on a loess-derived Luvisol under the conditions of two farming systems (conventional and organic) and five forecrops (sugar beet, spring barley, red clover, winter wheat, and oat) over the period 2021–2023. In the conventional system, mineral NPK fertilization and pesticides (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elżbieta Harasim, Cezary A. Kwiatkowski, Jan Buczek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/1/39
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589459009306624
author Elżbieta Harasim
Cezary A. Kwiatkowski
Jan Buczek
author_facet Elżbieta Harasim
Cezary A. Kwiatkowski
Jan Buczek
author_sort Elżbieta Harasim
collection DOAJ
description Spring wheat was grown on a loess-derived Luvisol under the conditions of two farming systems (conventional and organic) and five forecrops (sugar beet, spring barley, red clover, winter wheat, and oat) over the period 2021–2023. In the conventional system, mineral NPK fertilization and pesticides (herbicides, fungicide, insecticide, and retardant) were applied at the recommended rates for wheat. Mechanical weed control was also used (double harrowing). In the organic system, the organic fertilizer Humac Agro was applied and the fields under the wheat were harrowed twice. No plant protection products were used under organic farming conditions. The organic system was proven to have an effect on reducing spring wheat yield, on average by 23%, compared to the conventional system (the grain yield was, respectively, 4.59 t ha<sup>−1</sup> compared to 5.96 t ha<sup>−1</sup>). In spite of the lower yield potential, the organic cultivation of spring wheat significantly improved the quality and health-promoting parameters of this cereal grain. Except for the total nitrogen and potassium content, the organic system contributed to a significant increase in the grain content of total dietary fiber (by 0.89 p.p.), o-dihydroxyphenols (by about 19%), and polyphenols (by about 12%), and increased the content of the following elements: Se, Mg, Ca, Cu, Mn, Fe, and Zn. Among the forecrops, red clover and sugar beet had the most beneficial effect on grain quality (including the amino acid composition and EAAI index), followed by oat (especially under organic farming conditions). The other wheat forecrops (spring barley and winter wheat) clearly deteriorated the yield and quality of spring wheat grain. To sum up the obtained research results, appropriate management of organic spring wheat cultivation (forecrop sugar beet or red clover, Humac Agro fertilizer) contributes to high grain nutritional quality relative to the conventional system and also reduces the yield gap relative to conventional farming.
format Article
id doaj-art-267d6cb706924d2982ae0d1e701e7a74
institution Kabale University
issn 2073-4395
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj-art-267d6cb706924d2982ae0d1e701e7a742025-01-24T13:16:27ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952024-12-011513910.3390/agronomy15010039The Influence of the Farming System and Forecrop on the Yield and Chemical and Health-Promoting Composition of Spring Wheat GrainElżbieta Harasim0Cezary A. Kwiatkowski1Jan Buczek2Department of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, Faculty of Agrobioengineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, PolandDepartment of Herbology and Plant Cultivation Techniques, Faculty of Agrobioengineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, PolandDepartment of Crop Production, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Zelwerowicza 4, 35-601 Rzeszow, PolandSpring wheat was grown on a loess-derived Luvisol under the conditions of two farming systems (conventional and organic) and five forecrops (sugar beet, spring barley, red clover, winter wheat, and oat) over the period 2021–2023. In the conventional system, mineral NPK fertilization and pesticides (herbicides, fungicide, insecticide, and retardant) were applied at the recommended rates for wheat. Mechanical weed control was also used (double harrowing). In the organic system, the organic fertilizer Humac Agro was applied and the fields under the wheat were harrowed twice. No plant protection products were used under organic farming conditions. The organic system was proven to have an effect on reducing spring wheat yield, on average by 23%, compared to the conventional system (the grain yield was, respectively, 4.59 t ha<sup>−1</sup> compared to 5.96 t ha<sup>−1</sup>). In spite of the lower yield potential, the organic cultivation of spring wheat significantly improved the quality and health-promoting parameters of this cereal grain. Except for the total nitrogen and potassium content, the organic system contributed to a significant increase in the grain content of total dietary fiber (by 0.89 p.p.), o-dihydroxyphenols (by about 19%), and polyphenols (by about 12%), and increased the content of the following elements: Se, Mg, Ca, Cu, Mn, Fe, and Zn. Among the forecrops, red clover and sugar beet had the most beneficial effect on grain quality (including the amino acid composition and EAAI index), followed by oat (especially under organic farming conditions). The other wheat forecrops (spring barley and winter wheat) clearly deteriorated the yield and quality of spring wheat grain. To sum up the obtained research results, appropriate management of organic spring wheat cultivation (forecrop sugar beet or red clover, Humac Agro fertilizer) contributes to high grain nutritional quality relative to the conventional system and also reduces the yield gap relative to conventional farming.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/1/39spring wheatconventional systemorganic systemforecropyieldinggrain quality
spellingShingle Elżbieta Harasim
Cezary A. Kwiatkowski
Jan Buczek
The Influence of the Farming System and Forecrop on the Yield and Chemical and Health-Promoting Composition of Spring Wheat Grain
Agronomy
spring wheat
conventional system
organic system
forecrop
yielding
grain quality
title The Influence of the Farming System and Forecrop on the Yield and Chemical and Health-Promoting Composition of Spring Wheat Grain
title_full The Influence of the Farming System and Forecrop on the Yield and Chemical and Health-Promoting Composition of Spring Wheat Grain
title_fullStr The Influence of the Farming System and Forecrop on the Yield and Chemical and Health-Promoting Composition of Spring Wheat Grain
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of the Farming System and Forecrop on the Yield and Chemical and Health-Promoting Composition of Spring Wheat Grain
title_short The Influence of the Farming System and Forecrop on the Yield and Chemical and Health-Promoting Composition of Spring Wheat Grain
title_sort influence of the farming system and forecrop on the yield and chemical and health promoting composition of spring wheat grain
topic spring wheat
conventional system
organic system
forecrop
yielding
grain quality
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/1/39
work_keys_str_mv AT elzbietaharasim theinfluenceofthefarmingsystemandforecropontheyieldandchemicalandhealthpromotingcompositionofspringwheatgrain
AT cezaryakwiatkowski theinfluenceofthefarmingsystemandforecropontheyieldandchemicalandhealthpromotingcompositionofspringwheatgrain
AT janbuczek theinfluenceofthefarmingsystemandforecropontheyieldandchemicalandhealthpromotingcompositionofspringwheatgrain
AT elzbietaharasim influenceofthefarmingsystemandforecropontheyieldandchemicalandhealthpromotingcompositionofspringwheatgrain
AT cezaryakwiatkowski influenceofthefarmingsystemandforecropontheyieldandchemicalandhealthpromotingcompositionofspringwheatgrain
AT janbuczek influenceofthefarmingsystemandforecropontheyieldandchemicalandhealthpromotingcompositionofspringwheatgrain