Effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in patients with colorectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews

Objective: To evaluate existing evidence from published systematic reviews for the effectiveness and safety of rehabilitation interventions in adult patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using medical/health science databases up to October 2024. B...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mengzhe Yang, Bhasker Amatya, Sana Malik, Krystal Song, Stefanie Marcella, Catherine Voutier, Fary Khan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Journals Sweden 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://medicaljournalssweden.se/jrm/article/view/40021
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589751844077568
author Mengzhe Yang
Bhasker Amatya
Sana Malik
Krystal Song
Stefanie Marcella
Catherine Voutier
Fary Khan
author_facet Mengzhe Yang
Bhasker Amatya
Sana Malik
Krystal Song
Stefanie Marcella
Catherine Voutier
Fary Khan
author_sort Mengzhe Yang
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To evaluate existing evidence from published systematic reviews for the effectiveness and safety of rehabilitation interventions in adult patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using medical/health science databases up to October 2024. Bibliographies of pertinent articles, journals, and grey literature were searched. Three reviewers independently selected potential reviews, assessed methodological quality, and graded the quality of evidence for outcomes using validated tools. Results: Sixty systematic reviews (761 randomized controlled trials) evaluated 5 categories of rehabilitation interventions. Over half of the included reviews (n = 31) were of moderate–high quality. The findings suggest: moderate-quality evidence for exercise interventions for improving physical fitness and quality of life; high-quality evidence for nutritional interventions in reducing postoperative infections; high-quality evidence for multimodal prehabilitation for improved preoperative functional capacity; moderate-quality evidence for nutritional interventions for improving humoral immunity, reducing inflammation, and length of stay; moderate-quality evidence for acupuncture in improving gastrointestinal functional recovery; psychosocial interventions in improving short-term quality of life and mental health, and lifestyle interventions for improved quality of life. Conclusion: Rehabilitation interventions yielded positive effects across multiple outcomes. However, high-quality evidence is still needed to determine the most effective rehabilitation approaches for patients with colorectal cancer.
format Article
id doaj-art-2641865baa3340be95a1391c1b9094b3
institution Kabale University
issn 1651-2081
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Medical Journals Sweden
record_format Article
series Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
spelling doaj-art-2641865baa3340be95a1391c1b9094b32025-01-24T08:17:34ZengMedical Journals SwedenJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine1651-20812025-01-015710.2340/jrm.v57.40021Effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in patients with colorectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviewsMengzhe Yang0https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3605-8270Bhasker Amatya 1Sana Malik 2Krystal Song3Stefanie Marcella4Catherine Voutier5Fary Khan6Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Australian Rehabilitation Research Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Rehabilitation, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaAustralian Rehabilitation Research Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USADepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Australian Rehabilitation Research Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Rehabilitation, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, AustraliaObjective: To evaluate existing evidence from published systematic reviews for the effectiveness and safety of rehabilitation interventions in adult patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using medical/health science databases up to October 2024. Bibliographies of pertinent articles, journals, and grey literature were searched. Three reviewers independently selected potential reviews, assessed methodological quality, and graded the quality of evidence for outcomes using validated tools. Results: Sixty systematic reviews (761 randomized controlled trials) evaluated 5 categories of rehabilitation interventions. Over half of the included reviews (n = 31) were of moderate–high quality. The findings suggest: moderate-quality evidence for exercise interventions for improving physical fitness and quality of life; high-quality evidence for nutritional interventions in reducing postoperative infections; high-quality evidence for multimodal prehabilitation for improved preoperative functional capacity; moderate-quality evidence for nutritional interventions for improving humoral immunity, reducing inflammation, and length of stay; moderate-quality evidence for acupuncture in improving gastrointestinal functional recovery; psychosocial interventions in improving short-term quality of life and mental health, and lifestyle interventions for improved quality of life. Conclusion: Rehabilitation interventions yielded positive effects across multiple outcomes. However, high-quality evidence is still needed to determine the most effective rehabilitation approaches for patients with colorectal cancer. https://medicaljournalssweden.se/jrm/article/view/40021RehabilitationColorectal neoplasmsColorectal cancerSystematic ReviewCritical Appraisal
spellingShingle Mengzhe Yang
Bhasker Amatya
Sana Malik
Krystal Song
Stefanie Marcella
Catherine Voutier
Fary Khan
Effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in patients with colorectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Rehabilitation
Colorectal neoplasms
Colorectal cancer
Systematic Review
Critical Appraisal
title Effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in patients with colorectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full Effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in patients with colorectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in patients with colorectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in patients with colorectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews
title_short Effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in patients with colorectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews
title_sort effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in patients with colorectal cancer an overview of systematic reviews
topic Rehabilitation
Colorectal neoplasms
Colorectal cancer
Systematic Review
Critical Appraisal
url https://medicaljournalssweden.se/jrm/article/view/40021
work_keys_str_mv AT mengzheyang effectivenessofrehabilitationinterventionsinpatientswithcolorectalcanceranoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT bhaskeramatya effectivenessofrehabilitationinterventionsinpatientswithcolorectalcanceranoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT sanamalik effectivenessofrehabilitationinterventionsinpatientswithcolorectalcanceranoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT krystalsong effectivenessofrehabilitationinterventionsinpatientswithcolorectalcanceranoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT stefaniemarcella effectivenessofrehabilitationinterventionsinpatientswithcolorectalcanceranoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT catherinevoutier effectivenessofrehabilitationinterventionsinpatientswithcolorectalcanceranoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT farykhan effectivenessofrehabilitationinterventionsinpatientswithcolorectalcanceranoverviewofsystematicreviews