Fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instability

Abstract To understand the intrinsic causes and influencing factors of shale wellbore instability, the anisotropic mechanical properties of layered rocks is analyzed. Using the existing strength test data of shale with different bedding angles, the variation characteristics of rock strength with bed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jinyou Zhang, Xiaobo Liu, Hongge Jia, Xuejia Du, Zhongmin Wang, Guoqiang Pan, Mingming Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2025-04-01
Series:Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-025-00952-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850148938684825600
author Jinyou Zhang
Xiaobo Liu
Hongge Jia
Xuejia Du
Zhongmin Wang
Guoqiang Pan
Mingming Zhang
author_facet Jinyou Zhang
Xiaobo Liu
Hongge Jia
Xuejia Du
Zhongmin Wang
Guoqiang Pan
Mingming Zhang
author_sort Jinyou Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract To understand the intrinsic causes and influencing factors of shale wellbore instability, the anisotropic mechanical properties of layered rocks is analyzed. Using the existing strength test data of shale with different bedding angles, the variation characteristics of rock strength with bedding are investigated, and the prediction accuracy of different types of anisotropic strength criteria are validated by using the experimental data. Then, based on the thermal-hydro-mechanical stress model of the cemented wellbore, combined with the selected anisotropic strength criteria, we conducted a systematic study on the variation law of wellbore collapse pressure in shale formations. The results show that the Pariseau criterion can distinguish the strength difference between vertical and horizontal bedding, but the prediction error is large. In contrast, the single plane of weakness model (SPW) and patchy plane of weakness model (PPW) criteria cannot distinguish the strength difference between vertical and horizontal bedding but have better predictive performance for the strength during shear slip failure along the bedding plane. Additionally, the PPW criterion has higher prediction accuracy for rock strength than the SPW criterion within the bedding angle ranges of 0 ~ β1 and β2 ~ 90°. The collapse pressure contour maps predicted by the SPW and PPW criteria are similar, while those predicted by the Pariseau criterion show significant differences, with the Pariseau criterion underestimating the wellbore collapse pressure in shale formations, potentially leading to severe consequences. The predictions of the PPW and SPW criteria are safer and more reliable. In the studied layered shale formations, when the well deviation angle is less than 60°, drilling along the up-dip direction provides better wellbore stability; when the well deviation angle is greater than 60°, drilling along the down-dip direction provides better wellbore stability. Additionally, under any bedding orientation condition, the collapse pressure of a horizontal well is higher than that of a vertical well, but the collapse pressure of a vertical well is more sensitive to changes in bedding orientation, with greater fluctuation range. These research findings provide a scientific basis for the design and construction schemes of drilling engineering, ensuring the safety and efficiency of drilling operations.
format Article
id doaj-art-25bacd59b9ec40438bd369f6fa84a7ec
institution OA Journals
issn 2363-8419
2363-8427
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
spelling doaj-art-25bacd59b9ec40438bd369f6fa84a7ec2025-08-20T02:27:06ZengSpringerGeomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources2363-84192363-84272025-04-0111112110.1007/s40948-025-00952-4Fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instabilityJinyou Zhang0Xiaobo Liu1Hongge Jia2Xuejia Du3Zhongmin Wang4Guoqiang Pan5Mingming Zhang6Northeast Petroleum UniversityNortheast Petroleum UniversityCNPC-International Aktobepetroleum Joint CompanyDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, University of HoustonState Key Laboratory of Continental Shale OilState Key Laboratory of Continental Shale OilSinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., China Petroleum & Chemical CorporationAbstract To understand the intrinsic causes and influencing factors of shale wellbore instability, the anisotropic mechanical properties of layered rocks is analyzed. Using the existing strength test data of shale with different bedding angles, the variation characteristics of rock strength with bedding are investigated, and the prediction accuracy of different types of anisotropic strength criteria are validated by using the experimental data. Then, based on the thermal-hydro-mechanical stress model of the cemented wellbore, combined with the selected anisotropic strength criteria, we conducted a systematic study on the variation law of wellbore collapse pressure in shale formations. The results show that the Pariseau criterion can distinguish the strength difference between vertical and horizontal bedding, but the prediction error is large. In contrast, the single plane of weakness model (SPW) and patchy plane of weakness model (PPW) criteria cannot distinguish the strength difference between vertical and horizontal bedding but have better predictive performance for the strength during shear slip failure along the bedding plane. Additionally, the PPW criterion has higher prediction accuracy for rock strength than the SPW criterion within the bedding angle ranges of 0 ~ β1 and β2 ~ 90°. The collapse pressure contour maps predicted by the SPW and PPW criteria are similar, while those predicted by the Pariseau criterion show significant differences, with the Pariseau criterion underestimating the wellbore collapse pressure in shale formations, potentially leading to severe consequences. The predictions of the PPW and SPW criteria are safer and more reliable. In the studied layered shale formations, when the well deviation angle is less than 60°, drilling along the up-dip direction provides better wellbore stability; when the well deviation angle is greater than 60°, drilling along the down-dip direction provides better wellbore stability. Additionally, under any bedding orientation condition, the collapse pressure of a horizontal well is higher than that of a vertical well, but the collapse pressure of a vertical well is more sensitive to changes in bedding orientation, with greater fluctuation range. These research findings provide a scientific basis for the design and construction schemes of drilling engineering, ensuring the safety and efficiency of drilling operations.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-025-00952-4Collapse pressureWellbore stabilityRock strengthAnisotropicTransversely isotropy
spellingShingle Jinyou Zhang
Xiaobo Liu
Hongge Jia
Xuejia Du
Zhongmin Wang
Guoqiang Pan
Mingming Zhang
Fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instability
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Collapse pressure
Wellbore stability
Rock strength
Anisotropic
Transversely isotropy
title Fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instability
title_full Fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instability
title_fullStr Fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instability
title_full_unstemmed Fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instability
title_short Fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instability
title_sort fitting of anisotropic strength parameters of laminated shale and its influence on wellbore instability
topic Collapse pressure
Wellbore stability
Rock strength
Anisotropic
Transversely isotropy
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-025-00952-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jinyouzhang fittingofanisotropicstrengthparametersoflaminatedshaleanditsinfluenceonwellboreinstability
AT xiaoboliu fittingofanisotropicstrengthparametersoflaminatedshaleanditsinfluenceonwellboreinstability
AT honggejia fittingofanisotropicstrengthparametersoflaminatedshaleanditsinfluenceonwellboreinstability
AT xuejiadu fittingofanisotropicstrengthparametersoflaminatedshaleanditsinfluenceonwellboreinstability
AT zhongminwang fittingofanisotropicstrengthparametersoflaminatedshaleanditsinfluenceonwellboreinstability
AT guoqiangpan fittingofanisotropicstrengthparametersoflaminatedshaleanditsinfluenceonwellboreinstability
AT mingmingzhang fittingofanisotropicstrengthparametersoflaminatedshaleanditsinfluenceonwellboreinstability