Beam breakup instability studies of powerful energy recovery linac for experiments

The maximum achievable beam current in an energy recovery linac (ERL) is often constrained by beam breakup (BBU) instability. Our previous research highlighted that filling patterns have a substantial impact on BBU instabilities in multipass ERLs. In this study, we extend our investigation to the ei...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Setiniyaz, R. Apsimon, P. H. Williams, C. Barbagallo, S. A. Bogacz, R. M. Bodenstein, K. Deitrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2025-01-01
Series:Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.28.011003
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832590449661968384
author S. Setiniyaz
R. Apsimon
P. H. Williams
C. Barbagallo
S. A. Bogacz
R. M. Bodenstein
K. Deitrick
author_facet S. Setiniyaz
R. Apsimon
P. H. Williams
C. Barbagallo
S. A. Bogacz
R. M. Bodenstein
K. Deitrick
author_sort S. Setiniyaz
collection DOAJ
description The maximum achievable beam current in an energy recovery linac (ERL) is often constrained by beam breakup (BBU) instability. Our previous research highlighted that filling patterns have a substantial impact on BBU instabilities in multipass ERLs. In this study, we extend our investigation to the eight-cavity model of the Powerful ERL for Experiment (PERLE). We evaluate its requirements for damping cavity higher order modes (HOMs) and propose optimal filling patterns and bunch timing strategies. Our findings reveal a significant new insight: while filling patterns are crucial, the timing of bunches also plays a critical role in mitigating HOM beam loading and BBU instability. This previously underestimated factor is essential for effective BBU control. We estimated the PERLE threshold current using both analytical and numerical models, incorporating the designed PERLE HOM dampers. During manufacturing, HOM frequencies are expected to vary slightly. Our study found no significant difference in BBU suppression for relative rms frequency jitters of 0.001, 0.002, and 0.005 for the same HOM. Introducing a jitter of 0.001 into our models, we found that the dampers effectively suppressed BBU instability, achieving a threshold current an order of magnitude higher than the design requirement. Our results offer new insights into ERL BBU beam dynamics and have important implications for the design of future ERLs.
format Article
id doaj-art-25502047001043e59dba82e566c43c39
institution Kabale University
issn 2469-9888
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher American Physical Society
record_format Article
series Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
spelling doaj-art-25502047001043e59dba82e566c43c392025-01-23T15:02:09ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Accelerators and Beams2469-98882025-01-0128101100310.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.28.011003Beam breakup instability studies of powerful energy recovery linac for experimentsS. SetiniyazR. ApsimonP. H. WilliamsC. BarbagalloS. A. BogaczR. M. BodensteinK. DeitrickThe maximum achievable beam current in an energy recovery linac (ERL) is often constrained by beam breakup (BBU) instability. Our previous research highlighted that filling patterns have a substantial impact on BBU instabilities in multipass ERLs. In this study, we extend our investigation to the eight-cavity model of the Powerful ERL for Experiment (PERLE). We evaluate its requirements for damping cavity higher order modes (HOMs) and propose optimal filling patterns and bunch timing strategies. Our findings reveal a significant new insight: while filling patterns are crucial, the timing of bunches also plays a critical role in mitigating HOM beam loading and BBU instability. This previously underestimated factor is essential for effective BBU control. We estimated the PERLE threshold current using both analytical and numerical models, incorporating the designed PERLE HOM dampers. During manufacturing, HOM frequencies are expected to vary slightly. Our study found no significant difference in BBU suppression for relative rms frequency jitters of 0.001, 0.002, and 0.005 for the same HOM. Introducing a jitter of 0.001 into our models, we found that the dampers effectively suppressed BBU instability, achieving a threshold current an order of magnitude higher than the design requirement. Our results offer new insights into ERL BBU beam dynamics and have important implications for the design of future ERLs.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.28.011003
spellingShingle S. Setiniyaz
R. Apsimon
P. H. Williams
C. Barbagallo
S. A. Bogacz
R. M. Bodenstein
K. Deitrick
Beam breakup instability studies of powerful energy recovery linac for experiments
Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
title Beam breakup instability studies of powerful energy recovery linac for experiments
title_full Beam breakup instability studies of powerful energy recovery linac for experiments
title_fullStr Beam breakup instability studies of powerful energy recovery linac for experiments
title_full_unstemmed Beam breakup instability studies of powerful energy recovery linac for experiments
title_short Beam breakup instability studies of powerful energy recovery linac for experiments
title_sort beam breakup instability studies of powerful energy recovery linac for experiments
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.28.011003
work_keys_str_mv AT ssetiniyaz beambreakupinstabilitystudiesofpowerfulenergyrecoverylinacforexperiments
AT rapsimon beambreakupinstabilitystudiesofpowerfulenergyrecoverylinacforexperiments
AT phwilliams beambreakupinstabilitystudiesofpowerfulenergyrecoverylinacforexperiments
AT cbarbagallo beambreakupinstabilitystudiesofpowerfulenergyrecoverylinacforexperiments
AT sabogacz beambreakupinstabilitystudiesofpowerfulenergyrecoverylinacforexperiments
AT rmbodenstein beambreakupinstabilitystudiesofpowerfulenergyrecoverylinacforexperiments
AT kdeitrick beambreakupinstabilitystudiesofpowerfulenergyrecoverylinacforexperiments