Prediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck Injury

Background. Cervical spine fracture is approximately 2%–5%. Diagnostic imaging in developing countries has several limitations. A computed tomography scan is not available 24 hours and not cost-effective. This study aims to develop a clinical tool to identify patients who must undergo a computed tom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natsinee Athinartrattanapong, Chaiyaporn Yuksen, Sittichok Leela-amornsin, Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong, Sirote Wongwaisayawan, Pittavat Leelapattana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Neurology Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6658679
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561754372046848
author Natsinee Athinartrattanapong
Chaiyaporn Yuksen
Sittichok Leela-amornsin
Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong
Sirote Wongwaisayawan
Pittavat Leelapattana
author_facet Natsinee Athinartrattanapong
Chaiyaporn Yuksen
Sittichok Leela-amornsin
Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong
Sirote Wongwaisayawan
Pittavat Leelapattana
author_sort Natsinee Athinartrattanapong
collection DOAJ
description Background. Cervical spine fracture is approximately 2%–5%. Diagnostic imaging in developing countries has several limitations. A computed tomography scan is not available 24 hours and not cost-effective. This study aims to develop a clinical tool to identify patients who must undergo a computed tomography scan to evaluate cervical spine fracture in a noncomputed tomography scan available hospital. Methods. The study was a diagnostic prediction rule. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, at the emergency department. This study included all patients aged over 16 years who had suspected cervical spine injury and underwent a computed tomography scan at the emergency department. The predictive model and prediction scores were developed via multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results. 375 patients met the criteria. 29 (7.73%) presented with cervical spine fracture on computed tomography scan and 346 did not. Five independent factors (i.e., high-risk mechanism of injury, paraparesis, paresthesia, limited range of motion of the neck, and associated chest or facial injury) were considered good predictors of C-spine fracture. The clinical prediction score for C-spine fracture was developed by dividing the patients into three probability groups (low, 0; moderate, 1–5; and high, 6–11), and the accuracy was 82.52%. In patients with a score of 1–5, the positive likelihood ratio for C-spine fracture was 1.46. Meanwhile, those with a score of 6–11 had an LR+ of 7.16. Conclusion. In a noncomputed tomography scan available hospital, traumatic spine injuries patients with a clinical prediction score ≥1 were associated with cervical spine fracture and should undergo computed tomography scan to evaluate C-spine fracture.
format Article
id doaj-art-24a80116d17f43be8dd0c06253c3dc06
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-1852
2090-1860
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Neurology Research International
spelling doaj-art-24a80116d17f43be8dd0c06253c3dc062025-02-03T01:24:13ZengWileyNeurology Research International2090-18522090-18602021-01-01202110.1155/2021/66586796658679Prediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck InjuryNatsinee Athinartrattanapong0Chaiyaporn Yuksen1Sittichok Leela-amornsin2Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong3Sirote Wongwaisayawan4Pittavat Leelapattana5Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandDepartment of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, ThailandBackground. Cervical spine fracture is approximately 2%–5%. Diagnostic imaging in developing countries has several limitations. A computed tomography scan is not available 24 hours and not cost-effective. This study aims to develop a clinical tool to identify patients who must undergo a computed tomography scan to evaluate cervical spine fracture in a noncomputed tomography scan available hospital. Methods. The study was a diagnostic prediction rule. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, at the emergency department. This study included all patients aged over 16 years who had suspected cervical spine injury and underwent a computed tomography scan at the emergency department. The predictive model and prediction scores were developed via multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results. 375 patients met the criteria. 29 (7.73%) presented with cervical spine fracture on computed tomography scan and 346 did not. Five independent factors (i.e., high-risk mechanism of injury, paraparesis, paresthesia, limited range of motion of the neck, and associated chest or facial injury) were considered good predictors of C-spine fracture. The clinical prediction score for C-spine fracture was developed by dividing the patients into three probability groups (low, 0; moderate, 1–5; and high, 6–11), and the accuracy was 82.52%. In patients with a score of 1–5, the positive likelihood ratio for C-spine fracture was 1.46. Meanwhile, those with a score of 6–11 had an LR+ of 7.16. Conclusion. In a noncomputed tomography scan available hospital, traumatic spine injuries patients with a clinical prediction score ≥1 were associated with cervical spine fracture and should undergo computed tomography scan to evaluate C-spine fracture.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6658679
spellingShingle Natsinee Athinartrattanapong
Chaiyaporn Yuksen
Sittichok Leela-amornsin
Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong
Sirote Wongwaisayawan
Pittavat Leelapattana
Prediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck Injury
Neurology Research International
title Prediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck Injury
title_full Prediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck Injury
title_fullStr Prediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck Injury
title_full_unstemmed Prediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck Injury
title_short Prediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck Injury
title_sort prediction score for cervical spine fracture in patients with traumatic neck injury
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6658679
work_keys_str_mv AT natsineeathinartrattanapong predictionscoreforcervicalspinefractureinpatientswithtraumaticneckinjury
AT chaiyapornyuksen predictionscoreforcervicalspinefractureinpatientswithtraumaticneckinjury
AT sittichokleelaamornsin predictionscoreforcervicalspinefractureinpatientswithtraumaticneckinjury
AT chetsadakonjenpanitpong predictionscoreforcervicalspinefractureinpatientswithtraumaticneckinjury
AT sirotewongwaisayawan predictionscoreforcervicalspinefractureinpatientswithtraumaticneckinjury
AT pittavatleelapattana predictionscoreforcervicalspinefractureinpatientswithtraumaticneckinjury