Hydrodynamics and Aquatic Vegetation Drive Spatial Patterns of Environmental DNA in Ponds

ABSTRACT Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling is a powerful method for detecting aquatic species at low densities. However, eDNA may remain close to the source in lentic systems, decreasing the effectiveness of eDNA surveys. We conducted cage experiments with salamanders and simultaneous detailed hydro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandra R. Mayne, Jeffrey A. Manning, Stephen M. Henderson, Meghan B. Parsley, Katherine M. Strickler, Jeffrey R. Nielson, Caren S. Goldberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-11-01
Series:Environmental DNA
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70036
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582933146238976
author Sandra R. Mayne
Jeffrey A. Manning
Stephen M. Henderson
Meghan B. Parsley
Katherine M. Strickler
Jeffrey R. Nielson
Caren S. Goldberg
author_facet Sandra R. Mayne
Jeffrey A. Manning
Stephen M. Henderson
Meghan B. Parsley
Katherine M. Strickler
Jeffrey R. Nielson
Caren S. Goldberg
author_sort Sandra R. Mayne
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling is a powerful method for detecting aquatic species at low densities. However, eDNA may remain close to the source in lentic systems, decreasing the effectiveness of eDNA surveys. We conducted cage experiments with salamanders and simultaneous detailed hydrologic and wind measurements to investigate the influence of the physical environment on detection patterns of eDNA in ponds. We found much higher detection rates in the surface layer than at depth, and that aquatic vegetation reduced detection of eDNA produced in open water by 80%–94%. Within the surface mixed layer, detection rates were highest close to the source in the direction of water flow in the bottom half of the layer, and detections farthest from the source occurred when velocities in this sublayer were high. Detections were near zero even close to the source when this sublayer was flowing fast and away from the sampling point. The direction of water flow in this lower half of the surface mixed layer was negatively correlated with wind direction for most of the study. These spatial and temporal dynamics indicate that eDNA transport processes in ponds are highly complex. Sampling away from aquatic vegetation, in the surface mixed layer, and upwind of potential sources, in addition to sampling at many locations within a pond and considering temporal patterns, may improve detection of rare pond species. This work contributes to a growing body of literature characterizing the variability of eDNA detection in lentic systems.
format Article
id doaj-art-2487fa9d188540f7ad0744a36b74b0a0
institution Kabale University
issn 2637-4943
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Environmental DNA
spelling doaj-art-2487fa9d188540f7ad0744a36b74b0a02025-01-29T05:11:50ZengWileyEnvironmental DNA2637-49432024-11-0166n/an/a10.1002/edn3.70036Hydrodynamics and Aquatic Vegetation Drive Spatial Patterns of Environmental DNA in PondsSandra R. Mayne0Jeffrey A. Manning1Stephen M. Henderson2Meghan B. Parsley3Katherine M. Strickler4Jeffrey R. Nielson5Caren S. Goldberg6School of the Environment Washington State University Pullman Washington USASchool of the Environment Washington State University Pullman Washington USASchool of the Environment Washington State University Vancouver Washington USASchool of the Environment Washington State University Pullman Washington USASchool of the Environment Washington State University Pullman Washington USASchool of the Environment Washington State University Vancouver Washington USASchool of the Environment Washington State University Pullman Washington USAABSTRACT Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling is a powerful method for detecting aquatic species at low densities. However, eDNA may remain close to the source in lentic systems, decreasing the effectiveness of eDNA surveys. We conducted cage experiments with salamanders and simultaneous detailed hydrologic and wind measurements to investigate the influence of the physical environment on detection patterns of eDNA in ponds. We found much higher detection rates in the surface layer than at depth, and that aquatic vegetation reduced detection of eDNA produced in open water by 80%–94%. Within the surface mixed layer, detection rates were highest close to the source in the direction of water flow in the bottom half of the layer, and detections farthest from the source occurred when velocities in this sublayer were high. Detections were near zero even close to the source when this sublayer was flowing fast and away from the sampling point. The direction of water flow in this lower half of the surface mixed layer was negatively correlated with wind direction for most of the study. These spatial and temporal dynamics indicate that eDNA transport processes in ponds are highly complex. Sampling away from aquatic vegetation, in the surface mixed layer, and upwind of potential sources, in addition to sampling at many locations within a pond and considering temporal patterns, may improve detection of rare pond species. This work contributes to a growing body of literature characterizing the variability of eDNA detection in lentic systems.https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70036environmental DNAhydrodynamicspondsUrodelawaterwind
spellingShingle Sandra R. Mayne
Jeffrey A. Manning
Stephen M. Henderson
Meghan B. Parsley
Katherine M. Strickler
Jeffrey R. Nielson
Caren S. Goldberg
Hydrodynamics and Aquatic Vegetation Drive Spatial Patterns of Environmental DNA in Ponds
Environmental DNA
environmental DNA
hydrodynamics
ponds
Urodela
water
wind
title Hydrodynamics and Aquatic Vegetation Drive Spatial Patterns of Environmental DNA in Ponds
title_full Hydrodynamics and Aquatic Vegetation Drive Spatial Patterns of Environmental DNA in Ponds
title_fullStr Hydrodynamics and Aquatic Vegetation Drive Spatial Patterns of Environmental DNA in Ponds
title_full_unstemmed Hydrodynamics and Aquatic Vegetation Drive Spatial Patterns of Environmental DNA in Ponds
title_short Hydrodynamics and Aquatic Vegetation Drive Spatial Patterns of Environmental DNA in Ponds
title_sort hydrodynamics and aquatic vegetation drive spatial patterns of environmental dna in ponds
topic environmental DNA
hydrodynamics
ponds
Urodela
water
wind
url https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70036
work_keys_str_mv AT sandrarmayne hydrodynamicsandaquaticvegetationdrivespatialpatternsofenvironmentaldnainponds
AT jeffreyamanning hydrodynamicsandaquaticvegetationdrivespatialpatternsofenvironmentaldnainponds
AT stephenmhenderson hydrodynamicsandaquaticvegetationdrivespatialpatternsofenvironmentaldnainponds
AT meghanbparsley hydrodynamicsandaquaticvegetationdrivespatialpatternsofenvironmentaldnainponds
AT katherinemstrickler hydrodynamicsandaquaticvegetationdrivespatialpatternsofenvironmentaldnainponds
AT jeffreyrnielson hydrodynamicsandaquaticvegetationdrivespatialpatternsofenvironmentaldnainponds
AT carensgoldberg hydrodynamicsandaquaticvegetationdrivespatialpatternsofenvironmentaldnainponds