The Obesity Paradox and Cardiorespiratory Fitness

Cardiorespiratory fitness as an explanation for the obesity paradox warrants further examination. We evaluated independent and joint associations of cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity with all-cause mortality in 811 middle-aged (age, 53.3±7.2 years) male never smokers without documented cardiop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul A. McAuley, Nancy S. Smith, Brian T. Emerson, Jonathan N. Myers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Obesity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/951582
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551864381472768
author Paul A. McAuley
Nancy S. Smith
Brian T. Emerson
Jonathan N. Myers
author_facet Paul A. McAuley
Nancy S. Smith
Brian T. Emerson
Jonathan N. Myers
author_sort Paul A. McAuley
collection DOAJ
description Cardiorespiratory fitness as an explanation for the obesity paradox warrants further examination. We evaluated independent and joint associations of cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity with all-cause mortality in 811 middle-aged (age, 53.3±7.2 years) male never smokers without documented cardiopulmonary disease or diabetes from the Veterans Exercise Testing Study (VETS). Cardiorespiratory fitness was quantified in metabolic equivalents (METs) using final treadmill speed and grade achieved on a maximal exercise test. Subjects were grouped for analysis by METs: unfit (lowest third) and fit (upper two-thirds); and by body mass index (kg/m2): nonobese (18.5−29.9) and obese (≥30.0). Associations of baseline fitness and adiposity measures with all-cause mortality were determined by Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, family history of coronary artery disease, and cardiovascular medication use. In multivariate analysis, mortality risk for obese/fit men did not differ significantly from the nonobese/fit reference group. However, compared to the reference group, nonobese and obese unfit men were 2.2 (𝑃=0.01) and 1.9 (𝑃=0.03) times more likely to die, respectively. Cardiorespiratory fitness altered the obesity paradox such that mortality risk was lower for both obese and nonobese men who were fit.
format Article
id doaj-art-24819daf21dd4c0c88d6871d366852b2
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0708
2090-0716
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Obesity
spelling doaj-art-24819daf21dd4c0c88d6871d366852b22025-02-03T06:00:18ZengWileyJournal of Obesity2090-07082090-07162012-01-01201210.1155/2012/951582951582The Obesity Paradox and Cardiorespiratory FitnessPaul A. McAuley0Nancy S. Smith1Brian T. Emerson2Jonathan N. Myers3Department of Human Performance and Sport Sciences, Winston-Salem State University, C024 Anderson, 601 S Martin Luther King Jr Drive, Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USADepartment of Physical Therapy, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USADepartment of Physical Therapy, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USADepartment of Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USACardiorespiratory fitness as an explanation for the obesity paradox warrants further examination. We evaluated independent and joint associations of cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity with all-cause mortality in 811 middle-aged (age, 53.3±7.2 years) male never smokers without documented cardiopulmonary disease or diabetes from the Veterans Exercise Testing Study (VETS). Cardiorespiratory fitness was quantified in metabolic equivalents (METs) using final treadmill speed and grade achieved on a maximal exercise test. Subjects were grouped for analysis by METs: unfit (lowest third) and fit (upper two-thirds); and by body mass index (kg/m2): nonobese (18.5−29.9) and obese (≥30.0). Associations of baseline fitness and adiposity measures with all-cause mortality were determined by Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, family history of coronary artery disease, and cardiovascular medication use. In multivariate analysis, mortality risk for obese/fit men did not differ significantly from the nonobese/fit reference group. However, compared to the reference group, nonobese and obese unfit men were 2.2 (𝑃=0.01) and 1.9 (𝑃=0.03) times more likely to die, respectively. Cardiorespiratory fitness altered the obesity paradox such that mortality risk was lower for both obese and nonobese men who were fit.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/951582
spellingShingle Paul A. McAuley
Nancy S. Smith
Brian T. Emerson
Jonathan N. Myers
The Obesity Paradox and Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Journal of Obesity
title The Obesity Paradox and Cardiorespiratory Fitness
title_full The Obesity Paradox and Cardiorespiratory Fitness
title_fullStr The Obesity Paradox and Cardiorespiratory Fitness
title_full_unstemmed The Obesity Paradox and Cardiorespiratory Fitness
title_short The Obesity Paradox and Cardiorespiratory Fitness
title_sort obesity paradox and cardiorespiratory fitness
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/951582
work_keys_str_mv AT paulamcauley theobesityparadoxandcardiorespiratoryfitness
AT nancyssmith theobesityparadoxandcardiorespiratoryfitness
AT briantemerson theobesityparadoxandcardiorespiratoryfitness
AT jonathannmyers theobesityparadoxandcardiorespiratoryfitness
AT paulamcauley obesityparadoxandcardiorespiratoryfitness
AT nancyssmith obesityparadoxandcardiorespiratoryfitness
AT briantemerson obesityparadoxandcardiorespiratoryfitness
AT jonathannmyers obesityparadoxandcardiorespiratoryfitness