Curiosités de l’observation photographique
To what extent is it possible to give an objective representation of a changing landscape by means of photography ? Which criteria should be adopted to achieve this ? Is this the purpose of a photographic observatory ? To answer these questions, it is necessary to reflect on the belief in a so-calle...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Agrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP Lille
2016-12-01
|
| Series: | Projets de Paysage |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/7241 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832096059757690880 |
|---|---|
| author | Yogan Muller |
| author_facet | Yogan Muller |
| author_sort | Yogan Muller |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | To what extent is it possible to give an objective representation of a changing landscape by means of photography ? Which criteria should be adopted to achieve this ? Is this the purpose of a photographic observatory ? To answer these questions, it is necessary to reflect on the belief in a so-called mechanical photographic image and to look at what has become of this belief in science and subsequently in art. Thus we shall follow the thread of observation, even if this means unravelling the notion until we encounter the that of objectivity which is implicitly associated with it. From that point on, based on an interview with the photographer Gilbert Fastenaekens, followed by an analysis of photographic images of empty landscapes, the aim will be to demonstrate the inadequacy of terms such as “neutrality”, “distance”, or even “detachment” ; often used confusedly in analysing the approach of photographers. When working on an assignment, although they are focusing on the landscape, photographers are entirely engaged in the field of photographic composition, albeit with a trained and highly instrumented eye. As for the images they produce, it is because they are taken within a long sequence of technical attachments that the very idea of a detached view should be considered as highly doubtful. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2342673fe9934467accf937ce72c7861 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1969-6124 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2016-12-01 |
| publisher | Agrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP Lille |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Projets de Paysage |
| spelling | doaj-art-2342673fe9934467accf937ce72c78612025-02-05T16:20:39ZfraAgrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP LilleProjets de Paysage1969-61242016-12-011510.4000/paysage.7241Curiosités de l’observation photographiqueYogan MullerTo what extent is it possible to give an objective representation of a changing landscape by means of photography ? Which criteria should be adopted to achieve this ? Is this the purpose of a photographic observatory ? To answer these questions, it is necessary to reflect on the belief in a so-called mechanical photographic image and to look at what has become of this belief in science and subsequently in art. Thus we shall follow the thread of observation, even if this means unravelling the notion until we encounter the that of objectivity which is implicitly associated with it. From that point on, based on an interview with the photographer Gilbert Fastenaekens, followed by an analysis of photographic images of empty landscapes, the aim will be to demonstrate the inadequacy of terms such as “neutrality”, “distance”, or even “detachment” ; often used confusedly in analysing the approach of photographers. When working on an assignment, although they are focusing on the landscape, photographers are entirely engaged in the field of photographic composition, albeit with a trained and highly instrumented eye. As for the images they produce, it is because they are taken within a long sequence of technical attachments that the very idea of a detached view should be considered as highly doubtful.https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/7241landscapewalkphotographyanthropoceneobjectivityepistemology |
| spellingShingle | Yogan Muller Curiosités de l’observation photographique Projets de Paysage landscape walk photography anthropocene objectivity epistemology |
| title | Curiosités de l’observation photographique |
| title_full | Curiosités de l’observation photographique |
| title_fullStr | Curiosités de l’observation photographique |
| title_full_unstemmed | Curiosités de l’observation photographique |
| title_short | Curiosités de l’observation photographique |
| title_sort | curiosites de l observation photographique |
| topic | landscape walk photography anthropocene objectivity epistemology |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/7241 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yoganmuller curiositesdelobservationphotographique |