Distances to emergency departments and non-urgent utilization of medical services: a systematic review

Background The use of Emergency Departments (EDs) for non-urgent medical conditions is a global public health concern. Objectives A systematic review, guided by a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42023398674), was conducted to interpret the association between distance as a measure of healthcare ac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uma Kelekar, Debasree Das Gupta, Nicole Theis-Mahon, Emily Fashingbauer, Boyen Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Global Health Action
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2353994
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832096649988538368
author Uma Kelekar
Debasree Das Gupta
Nicole Theis-Mahon
Emily Fashingbauer
Boyen Huang
author_facet Uma Kelekar
Debasree Das Gupta
Nicole Theis-Mahon
Emily Fashingbauer
Boyen Huang
author_sort Uma Kelekar
collection DOAJ
description Background The use of Emergency Departments (EDs) for non-urgent medical conditions is a global public health concern. Objectives A systematic review, guided by a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42023398674), was conducted to interpret the association between distance as a measure of healthcare access and the utilization of EDs for non-urgent care in high- and middle-income countries. Methods The search was conducted on 22 August 2023 across five databases using controlled vocabulary and natural language keywords. Eligibility criteria included studies that examined non-urgent care, and featured concepts of emergency departments, non-urgent health services and distance, reported in English. Articles and abstracts where patients were transported by ambulance/paramedic services, referred/transferred from another hospital to an ED, or those that measured distance to an ED from another health facility were excluded. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework informed the quality of evidence. Results Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. All studies demonstrated satisfactory quality with regard to study design, conduct, analysis and presentation of results. Eight (53.3%) of the studies (1 paediatric, 4 all ages/adult, 3 ecological) found a moderate level of evidence of an inverse association between distance and ED visit volume or utilization for non-urgent medical conditions, while the remaining studies reported very low or low evidence. Conclusions Half of the studies reported non-urgent ED use to be associated with shortest distance traveled or transportation time. This finding bears implications for healthcare policies aiming to reduce ED use for non-urgent care.
format Article
id doaj-art-230021a3f754498bbb58e56561e79bff
institution Kabale University
issn 1654-9880
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Global Health Action
spelling doaj-art-230021a3f754498bbb58e56561e79bff2025-02-05T12:46:13ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Health Action1654-98802024-12-0117110.1080/16549716.2024.23539942353994Distances to emergency departments and non-urgent utilization of medical services: a systematic reviewUma Kelekar0Debasree Das Gupta1Nicole Theis-Mahon2Emily Fashingbauer3Boyen Huang4Marymount University College of BusinessUtah State University Emma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human ServicesUniversity of MinnesotaMinnesota State University College of Allied Health and NursingUniversity of Minnesota School of DentistryBackground The use of Emergency Departments (EDs) for non-urgent medical conditions is a global public health concern. Objectives A systematic review, guided by a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42023398674), was conducted to interpret the association between distance as a measure of healthcare access and the utilization of EDs for non-urgent care in high- and middle-income countries. Methods The search was conducted on 22 August 2023 across five databases using controlled vocabulary and natural language keywords. Eligibility criteria included studies that examined non-urgent care, and featured concepts of emergency departments, non-urgent health services and distance, reported in English. Articles and abstracts where patients were transported by ambulance/paramedic services, referred/transferred from another hospital to an ED, or those that measured distance to an ED from another health facility were excluded. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework informed the quality of evidence. Results Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. All studies demonstrated satisfactory quality with regard to study design, conduct, analysis and presentation of results. Eight (53.3%) of the studies (1 paediatric, 4 all ages/adult, 3 ecological) found a moderate level of evidence of an inverse association between distance and ED visit volume or utilization for non-urgent medical conditions, while the remaining studies reported very low or low evidence. Conclusions Half of the studies reported non-urgent ED use to be associated with shortest distance traveled or transportation time. This finding bears implications for healthcare policies aiming to reduce ED use for non-urgent care.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2353994distancedistance decay effectemergency departmentnon-urgent utilizationsystematic review
spellingShingle Uma Kelekar
Debasree Das Gupta
Nicole Theis-Mahon
Emily Fashingbauer
Boyen Huang
Distances to emergency departments and non-urgent utilization of medical services: a systematic review
Global Health Action
distance
distance decay effect
emergency department
non-urgent utilization
systematic review
title Distances to emergency departments and non-urgent utilization of medical services: a systematic review
title_full Distances to emergency departments and non-urgent utilization of medical services: a systematic review
title_fullStr Distances to emergency departments and non-urgent utilization of medical services: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Distances to emergency departments and non-urgent utilization of medical services: a systematic review
title_short Distances to emergency departments and non-urgent utilization of medical services: a systematic review
title_sort distances to emergency departments and non urgent utilization of medical services a systematic review
topic distance
distance decay effect
emergency department
non-urgent utilization
systematic review
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2353994
work_keys_str_mv AT umakelekar distancestoemergencydepartmentsandnonurgentutilizationofmedicalservicesasystematicreview
AT debasreedasgupta distancestoemergencydepartmentsandnonurgentutilizationofmedicalservicesasystematicreview
AT nicoletheismahon distancestoemergencydepartmentsandnonurgentutilizationofmedicalservicesasystematicreview
AT emilyfashingbauer distancestoemergencydepartmentsandnonurgentutilizationofmedicalservicesasystematicreview
AT boyenhuang distancestoemergencydepartmentsandnonurgentutilizationofmedicalservicesasystematicreview