How salient are sarcastic questions?

This article explores the connection between salience and sarcasm through focusing on three interrogative constructions that can convey both sarcastic and literal meanings – WH-questions followed by a self-answer, alternative questions, and disjunctive polar questions. A large-scale corpus research...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Efrat Levant, Nicole Katzir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires du Midi 2024-08-01
Series:Anglophonia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/6053
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832579221019426816
author Efrat Levant
Nicole Katzir
author_facet Efrat Levant
Nicole Katzir
author_sort Efrat Levant
collection DOAJ
description This article explores the connection between salience and sarcasm through focusing on three interrogative constructions that can convey both sarcastic and literal meanings – WH-questions followed by a self-answer, alternative questions, and disjunctive polar questions. A large-scale corpus research was conducted throughout three distinct corpora of American-English to determine how these interrogative constructions use salience to encode sarcasm, and how salience contributes to the preference of their sarcastic meaning over the literal one. Firstly, we examine the salience of sarcasm by comparing the distribution of sarcastic questions between a spoken, non-scripted TV-corpus (COCA), a spoken telephone-corpus (Switchboard), and a written web-corpus (NLDS). The main goal of this comparison was to explore if sarcasm is significantly more salient in one corpus than the others. Results show that there are significantly more sarcastic questions in the written-web corpus than in the non-scripted spoken corpora, suggesting that sarcasm is significantly more salient in this corpus than the others. We attribute these results to situational and emotional salience stemming from the distinct discursive arenas. Secondly, we examine the distribution of the different question types to see if the sarcastic meaning is significantly more salient in one of the three interrogative constructions than the others. Results show that WH-questions followed by a self-answer are the most sarcastic construction out of the three examined, and that its sarcastic meaning is more salient than that of alternative questions and of disjunctive polar questions. We attribute these results to intrinsic syntactic properties and to the notion of predictability and (un)expectedness. We conclude the paper with thoughts regarding future work necessary to further our understanding of salient sarcastic questions.
format Article
id doaj-art-22dc139f95d14664a1b9c21c49435da7
institution Kabale University
issn 1278-3331
2427-0466
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher Presses Universitaires du Midi
record_format Article
series Anglophonia
spelling doaj-art-22dc139f95d14664a1b9c21c49435da72025-01-30T12:33:14ZengPresses Universitaires du MidiAnglophonia1278-33312427-04662024-08-013710.4000/12pofHow salient are sarcastic questions?Efrat LevantNicole KatzirThis article explores the connection between salience and sarcasm through focusing on three interrogative constructions that can convey both sarcastic and literal meanings – WH-questions followed by a self-answer, alternative questions, and disjunctive polar questions. A large-scale corpus research was conducted throughout three distinct corpora of American-English to determine how these interrogative constructions use salience to encode sarcasm, and how salience contributes to the preference of their sarcastic meaning over the literal one. Firstly, we examine the salience of sarcasm by comparing the distribution of sarcastic questions between a spoken, non-scripted TV-corpus (COCA), a spoken telephone-corpus (Switchboard), and a written web-corpus (NLDS). The main goal of this comparison was to explore if sarcasm is significantly more salient in one corpus than the others. Results show that there are significantly more sarcastic questions in the written-web corpus than in the non-scripted spoken corpora, suggesting that sarcasm is significantly more salient in this corpus than the others. We attribute these results to situational and emotional salience stemming from the distinct discursive arenas. Secondly, we examine the distribution of the different question types to see if the sarcastic meaning is significantly more salient in one of the three interrogative constructions than the others. Results show that WH-questions followed by a self-answer are the most sarcastic construction out of the three examined, and that its sarcastic meaning is more salient than that of alternative questions and of disjunctive polar questions. We attribute these results to intrinsic syntactic properties and to the notion of predictability and (un)expectedness. We conclude the paper with thoughts regarding future work necessary to further our understanding of salient sarcastic questions.https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/6053SarcasmSalienceQuestionsCorpus linguisticsDiscourse Analysis
spellingShingle Efrat Levant
Nicole Katzir
How salient are sarcastic questions?
Anglophonia
Sarcasm
Salience
Questions
Corpus linguistics
Discourse Analysis
title How salient are sarcastic questions?
title_full How salient are sarcastic questions?
title_fullStr How salient are sarcastic questions?
title_full_unstemmed How salient are sarcastic questions?
title_short How salient are sarcastic questions?
title_sort how salient are sarcastic questions
topic Sarcasm
Salience
Questions
Corpus linguistics
Discourse Analysis
url https://journals.openedition.org/anglophonia/6053
work_keys_str_mv AT efratlevant howsalientaresarcasticquestions
AT nicolekatzir howsalientaresarcasticquestions