Evaluation of translocation of black bears involved in human–bear conflicts in South‐central Colorado

ABSTRACT From 1995 to 1997, black bears (Ursus americanus) involved in conflicts with humans in southeastern Colorado, USA, were radiocollared, translocated, and monitored by the Colorado Division of Wildlife to evaluate translocation as a management tool for problem black bears. Specific objectives...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mat W. Alldredge, Daniel P. Walsh, Linda L. Sweanor, Robert B. Davies, Al Trujillo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-06-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.526
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850255518081220608
author Mat W. Alldredge
Daniel P. Walsh
Linda L. Sweanor
Robert B. Davies
Al Trujillo
author_facet Mat W. Alldredge
Daniel P. Walsh
Linda L. Sweanor
Robert B. Davies
Al Trujillo
author_sort Mat W. Alldredge
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT From 1995 to 1997, black bears (Ursus americanus) involved in conflicts with humans in southeastern Colorado, USA, were radiocollared, translocated, and monitored by the Colorado Division of Wildlife to evaluate translocation as a management tool for problem black bears. Specific objectives were to 1) determine postrelease movement patterns of relocated black bears, and 2) estimate cumulative incidence and survival functions. Subadults did not move as far after translocation as adults and less frequently oriented toward the capture site (29% of subad vs. 51% of ad). No subadults returned to the vicinity of capture, whereas 33% of adults did. We used a cause‐specific hazards model with a constant age effect across the cause‐specific hazards to estimate annual survival rate for translocated adult bears (0.50, 95% credible interval CI = 0.36–0.65) and for subadult bears (0.28, 95% CI = 0.12–0.48). The annual probability of dying due to repeat conflict behavior was slightly lower (0.22 [95% CI = 0.13–0.33] and 0.32 [95% CI = 0.19–0.47]) for adults and subadults, respectively, compared with nonconflict mortalities (0.28 [95% CI = 0.17–0.40] and 0.40 [95% CI = 0.25–0.56]). Based on bears that were not involved in known repeat human–bear conflicts, translocation success was 0.64 (95% CI = 0.49–0.78) and 0.58 (95% CI = 0.42–0.73) for adults and subadults, respectively. Translocation of problem bears had mixed success relative to repeat nuisance activity in Colorado, but should remain a viable management option. Managers should make decisions on the appropriateness of translocation based on the characteristics of the bear, identification of an adequate release site, potential effect of the translocation on the release‐site bear population, and other available options. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-22bd8c99578d4bf59e6cfc67fbcfe4e4
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-22bd8c99578d4bf59e6cfc67fbcfe4e42025-08-20T01:56:52ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402015-06-0139233434010.1002/wsb.526Evaluation of translocation of black bears involved in human–bear conflicts in South‐central ColoradoMat W. Alldredge0Daniel P. Walsh1Linda L. Sweanor2Robert B. Davies3Al Trujillo4Colorado Parks and Wildlife317 W Prospect Road, Fort CollinsCO 80526USAColorado Parks and Wildlife317 W Prospect Road, Fort CollinsCO 80526USAColorado Parks and Wildlife2300 South Townsend Avenue, MontroseCO 81401USAColorado Parks and Wildlife317 W Prospect Road, Fort CollinsCO 80526USAColorado Parks and Wildlife600 Reservoir Road, PuebloCO 81005USAABSTRACT From 1995 to 1997, black bears (Ursus americanus) involved in conflicts with humans in southeastern Colorado, USA, were radiocollared, translocated, and monitored by the Colorado Division of Wildlife to evaluate translocation as a management tool for problem black bears. Specific objectives were to 1) determine postrelease movement patterns of relocated black bears, and 2) estimate cumulative incidence and survival functions. Subadults did not move as far after translocation as adults and less frequently oriented toward the capture site (29% of subad vs. 51% of ad). No subadults returned to the vicinity of capture, whereas 33% of adults did. We used a cause‐specific hazards model with a constant age effect across the cause‐specific hazards to estimate annual survival rate for translocated adult bears (0.50, 95% credible interval CI = 0.36–0.65) and for subadult bears (0.28, 95% CI = 0.12–0.48). The annual probability of dying due to repeat conflict behavior was slightly lower (0.22 [95% CI = 0.13–0.33] and 0.32 [95% CI = 0.19–0.47]) for adults and subadults, respectively, compared with nonconflict mortalities (0.28 [95% CI = 0.17–0.40] and 0.40 [95% CI = 0.25–0.56]). Based on bears that were not involved in known repeat human–bear conflicts, translocation success was 0.64 (95% CI = 0.49–0.78) and 0.58 (95% CI = 0.42–0.73) for adults and subadults, respectively. Translocation of problem bears had mixed success relative to repeat nuisance activity in Colorado, but should remain a viable management option. Managers should make decisions on the appropriateness of translocation based on the characteristics of the bear, identification of an adequate release site, potential effect of the translocation on the release‐site bear population, and other available options. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.526black bearcause‐specific mortalityColoradoconflicthomingsurvival
spellingShingle Mat W. Alldredge
Daniel P. Walsh
Linda L. Sweanor
Robert B. Davies
Al Trujillo
Evaluation of translocation of black bears involved in human–bear conflicts in South‐central Colorado
Wildlife Society Bulletin
black bear
cause‐specific mortality
Colorado
conflict
homing
survival
title Evaluation of translocation of black bears involved in human–bear conflicts in South‐central Colorado
title_full Evaluation of translocation of black bears involved in human–bear conflicts in South‐central Colorado
title_fullStr Evaluation of translocation of black bears involved in human–bear conflicts in South‐central Colorado
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of translocation of black bears involved in human–bear conflicts in South‐central Colorado
title_short Evaluation of translocation of black bears involved in human–bear conflicts in South‐central Colorado
title_sort evaluation of translocation of black bears involved in human bear conflicts in south central colorado
topic black bear
cause‐specific mortality
Colorado
conflict
homing
survival
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.526
work_keys_str_mv AT matwalldredge evaluationoftranslocationofblackbearsinvolvedinhumanbearconflictsinsouthcentralcolorado
AT danielpwalsh evaluationoftranslocationofblackbearsinvolvedinhumanbearconflictsinsouthcentralcolorado
AT lindalsweanor evaluationoftranslocationofblackbearsinvolvedinhumanbearconflictsinsouthcentralcolorado
AT robertbdavies evaluationoftranslocationofblackbearsinvolvedinhumanbearconflictsinsouthcentralcolorado
AT altrujillo evaluationoftranslocationofblackbearsinvolvedinhumanbearconflictsinsouthcentralcolorado