Open challenges for the automatic synthesis of clinical trials
Abstract Objective An important criterion for selecting clinical trials to be compared in systematic reviews and meta-analyses is that they measure the same outcomes. However, this represents a challenge as there is a wide variety of outcomes, and it is difficult to standardize them for comparing cl...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Olivia Sanchez-Graillet, David M. Schmidt, Christian Kullik, Philipp Cimiano |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2025-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Research Notes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07121-6 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Demise of Kreutz Sungrazing Comet C/2024 S1 (ATLAS)
by: David Jewitt, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Development of a family-centred core outcome set for infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip treated with a brace
by: Joanna Craven, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Paper-work: what module guides have to say about assessment practices
by: Judith Enriquez
Published: (2020-09-01) -
The case for development of a core outcome set (COS) and supplemental reporting guidelines for influenza vaccine challenge trial research in swine
by: Sheila Keay, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Clinical trial participation, clinical care, and patient outcomes by practice setting: a real-world database analysis of patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia or Mantle Cell Lymphoma
by: Debora S. Bruno, et al.
Published: (2025-12-01)