The Chinese version of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire: psychometric properties among adolescent students
ObjectiveThis study established the reliability and validity of the Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire in a sample of senior secondary school students in China.MethodsThe data for this study were sourced from 1,080 students from multiple senior secondary schools using the SOC Qu...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1453882/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832539876799545344 |
|---|---|
| author | Mengjun Zhu Xing’an Yao Abu Talib Mansor |
| author_facet | Mengjun Zhu Xing’an Yao Abu Talib Mansor |
| author_sort | Mengjun Zhu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ObjectiveThis study established the reliability and validity of the Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire in a sample of senior secondary school students in China.MethodsThe data for this study were sourced from 1,080 students from multiple senior secondary schools using the SOC Questionnaire and the Learning Engagement Scale. This study conducted Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The factor structure analysis of the psychometric properties of SOC Questionnaire were examined on reliability, convergent validity, concurrent criterion validity, and incremental validity.ResultsThe EFA results suggested that a three-factor solution was most appropriate for the SOC Questionnaire. The three-factor CFA model of this study calculated correlations different from what was published with an American sample of adolescents by the questionnaire developers. The reliability coefficients (Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ω), composite reliability (rho_c), and reliability coefficient (rho_a), convergent and discriminant validity were good. Concurrent criterion validity, and incremental validity were demonstrated by the SOC Questionnaire and the LES.ConclusionThe 17-item, 3-factor SOC Questionnaire demonstrated strong reliability and validity, thus offering a new multidimensional of the SOC Questionnaire to evaluate intentional self-regulation among adolescents in schools. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2257a1575b8a47d8a87e4041541c7d6b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1664-1078 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Psychology |
| spelling | doaj-art-2257a1575b8a47d8a87e4041541c7d6b2025-02-05T07:32:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782025-02-011610.3389/fpsyg.2025.14538821453882The Chinese version of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire: psychometric properties among adolescent studentsMengjun Zhu0Xing’an Yao1Abu Talib Mansor2Wellbeing Research Centre, Faculty of Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaSchool of Marxism, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing, ChinaWellbeing Research Centre, Faculty of Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaObjectiveThis study established the reliability and validity of the Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire in a sample of senior secondary school students in China.MethodsThe data for this study were sourced from 1,080 students from multiple senior secondary schools using the SOC Questionnaire and the Learning Engagement Scale. This study conducted Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The factor structure analysis of the psychometric properties of SOC Questionnaire were examined on reliability, convergent validity, concurrent criterion validity, and incremental validity.ResultsThe EFA results suggested that a three-factor solution was most appropriate for the SOC Questionnaire. The three-factor CFA model of this study calculated correlations different from what was published with an American sample of adolescents by the questionnaire developers. The reliability coefficients (Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ω), composite reliability (rho_c), and reliability coefficient (rho_a), convergent and discriminant validity were good. Concurrent criterion validity, and incremental validity were demonstrated by the SOC Questionnaire and the LES.ConclusionThe 17-item, 3-factor SOC Questionnaire demonstrated strong reliability and validity, thus offering a new multidimensional of the SOC Questionnaire to evaluate intentional self-regulation among adolescents in schools.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1453882/fullintentional self-regulationregulation strategiesvalidationreliabilityadolescent |
| spellingShingle | Mengjun Zhu Xing’an Yao Abu Talib Mansor The Chinese version of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire: psychometric properties among adolescent students Frontiers in Psychology intentional self-regulation regulation strategies validation reliability adolescent |
| title | The Chinese version of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire: psychometric properties among adolescent students |
| title_full | The Chinese version of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire: psychometric properties among adolescent students |
| title_fullStr | The Chinese version of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire: psychometric properties among adolescent students |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Chinese version of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire: psychometric properties among adolescent students |
| title_short | The Chinese version of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Questionnaire: psychometric properties among adolescent students |
| title_sort | chinese version of selection optimization and compensation questionnaire psychometric properties among adolescent students |
| topic | intentional self-regulation regulation strategies validation reliability adolescent |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1453882/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mengjunzhu thechineseversionofselectionoptimizationandcompensationquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesamongadolescentstudents AT xinganyao thechineseversionofselectionoptimizationandcompensationquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesamongadolescentstudents AT abutalibmansor thechineseversionofselectionoptimizationandcompensationquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesamongadolescentstudents AT mengjunzhu chineseversionofselectionoptimizationandcompensationquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesamongadolescentstudents AT xinganyao chineseversionofselectionoptimizationandcompensationquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesamongadolescentstudents AT abutalibmansor chineseversionofselectionoptimizationandcompensationquestionnairepsychometricpropertiesamongadolescentstudents |