Integrated Workflow of Geomechanics, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Reservoir Simulation for Production Estimation of a Shale Gas Reservoir

In this research, an integrated workflow from geomechanics to reservoir simulation is suggested to accurately estimate performances of a shale gas reservoir. Rather than manipulating values of hydraulic fracturing such as fracture geometry and transmissibility, the workflow tries to update model par...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taeyeob Lee, Daein Jeong, Youngseok So, Daejin Park, Munseok Baek, Jonggeun Choe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Geofluids
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8856070
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550471406977024
author Taeyeob Lee
Daein Jeong
Youngseok So
Daejin Park
Munseok Baek
Jonggeun Choe
author_facet Taeyeob Lee
Daein Jeong
Youngseok So
Daejin Park
Munseok Baek
Jonggeun Choe
author_sort Taeyeob Lee
collection DOAJ
description In this research, an integrated workflow from geomechanics to reservoir simulation is suggested to accurately estimate performances of a shale gas reservoir. Rather than manipulating values of hydraulic fracturing such as fracture geometry and transmissibility, the workflow tries to update model parameters to derive reliable hydraulic fracturing results. A mechanical earth model (MEM) is built from seismic attribute and drilling and diagnostic fracture injection test results. Then, the MEM is calibrated with microseismic measurements obtained in a field. Leakoff coefficient and horizontal stress anisotropy are sensitive parameters of the MEM that influence the propagation of the fracture network and gas productions. Various combinations of calibration parameters from a single-well simulation are evaluated. Then, an appropriate combination is chosen from the whole simulation results of a pad to reduce the uncertainty. Finally, production estimations of the four wells which have slightly different fracture design are compared with seven-year production history. Their results are reasonably matched with actual data having 8% of global error due to successful development of the reservoir model with geomechanical parameters.
format Article
id doaj-art-224d0b61532a4509aa4617914a9c952a
institution Kabale University
issn 1468-8115
1468-8123
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geofluids
spelling doaj-art-224d0b61532a4509aa4617914a9c952a2025-02-03T06:06:40ZengWileyGeofluids1468-81151468-81232021-01-01202110.1155/2021/88560708856070Integrated Workflow of Geomechanics, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Reservoir Simulation for Production Estimation of a Shale Gas ReservoirTaeyeob Lee0Daein Jeong1Youngseok So2Daejin Park3Munseok Baek4Jonggeun Choe5E&P Research Center, Korea Gas Corporation, 41062, Republic of KoreaSchlumberger Information Solutions, Schlumberger, 103-0027, JapanE&P Research Center, Korea Gas Corporation, 41062, Republic of KoreaE&P Research Center, Korea Gas Corporation, 41062, Republic of KoreaE&P Research Center, Korea Gas Corporation, 41062, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Energy System Engineering, Seoul National University, 08826, Republic of KoreaIn this research, an integrated workflow from geomechanics to reservoir simulation is suggested to accurately estimate performances of a shale gas reservoir. Rather than manipulating values of hydraulic fracturing such as fracture geometry and transmissibility, the workflow tries to update model parameters to derive reliable hydraulic fracturing results. A mechanical earth model (MEM) is built from seismic attribute and drilling and diagnostic fracture injection test results. Then, the MEM is calibrated with microseismic measurements obtained in a field. Leakoff coefficient and horizontal stress anisotropy are sensitive parameters of the MEM that influence the propagation of the fracture network and gas productions. Various combinations of calibration parameters from a single-well simulation are evaluated. Then, an appropriate combination is chosen from the whole simulation results of a pad to reduce the uncertainty. Finally, production estimations of the four wells which have slightly different fracture design are compared with seven-year production history. Their results are reasonably matched with actual data having 8% of global error due to successful development of the reservoir model with geomechanical parameters.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8856070
spellingShingle Taeyeob Lee
Daein Jeong
Youngseok So
Daejin Park
Munseok Baek
Jonggeun Choe
Integrated Workflow of Geomechanics, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Reservoir Simulation for Production Estimation of a Shale Gas Reservoir
Geofluids
title Integrated Workflow of Geomechanics, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Reservoir Simulation for Production Estimation of a Shale Gas Reservoir
title_full Integrated Workflow of Geomechanics, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Reservoir Simulation for Production Estimation of a Shale Gas Reservoir
title_fullStr Integrated Workflow of Geomechanics, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Reservoir Simulation for Production Estimation of a Shale Gas Reservoir
title_full_unstemmed Integrated Workflow of Geomechanics, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Reservoir Simulation for Production Estimation of a Shale Gas Reservoir
title_short Integrated Workflow of Geomechanics, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Reservoir Simulation for Production Estimation of a Shale Gas Reservoir
title_sort integrated workflow of geomechanics hydraulic fracturing and reservoir simulation for production estimation of a shale gas reservoir
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8856070
work_keys_str_mv AT taeyeoblee integratedworkflowofgeomechanicshydraulicfracturingandreservoirsimulationforproductionestimationofashalegasreservoir
AT daeinjeong integratedworkflowofgeomechanicshydraulicfracturingandreservoirsimulationforproductionestimationofashalegasreservoir
AT youngseokso integratedworkflowofgeomechanicshydraulicfracturingandreservoirsimulationforproductionestimationofashalegasreservoir
AT daejinpark integratedworkflowofgeomechanicshydraulicfracturingandreservoirsimulationforproductionestimationofashalegasreservoir
AT munseokbaek integratedworkflowofgeomechanicshydraulicfracturingandreservoirsimulationforproductionestimationofashalegasreservoir
AT jonggeunchoe integratedworkflowofgeomechanicshydraulicfracturingandreservoirsimulationforproductionestimationofashalegasreservoir