Exploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists: an updated scoping review

Abstract Background The adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists (“therapists”) to examine and assess the diaphragm and lungs continues to grow. The aim of this updated scoping review is to re-explore and re-collate the evi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon Hayward, Camella Cardinael, Chloe Tait, Michael Reid, Andrew McCarthy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-01-01
Series:The Ultrasound Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00412-w
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585898634510336
author Simon Hayward
Camella Cardinael
Chloe Tait
Michael Reid
Andrew McCarthy
author_facet Simon Hayward
Camella Cardinael
Chloe Tait
Michael Reid
Andrew McCarthy
author_sort Simon Hayward
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists (“therapists”) to examine and assess the diaphragm and lungs continues to grow. The aim of this updated scoping review is to re-explore and re-collate the evidence around the adoption of DLUS by therapists. Methods This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Data sources searched included AMED, EmCare, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PubMed and Pedro. Grey literature sources were searched alongside communication with leading authors in the field. The Participants, Concept and Context (PCC) approach was employed to formulate the research question. A charting form was developed and piloted to extract: title, authors, year of publication, country of origin, professional group involved (population), lung or diaphragm ultrasound (concept), evaluation method, educational, clinical or research setting (context), subject/disease/patient group, sample size, study design and professional group performing DLUS. Results 133 studies met all inclusion criteria, an increase of 107 new studies compared to the original scoping review searches 7-years ago. Studies were included from 17 new countries and included 17 new participant populations. Lung ultrasound saw the largest increase in study number with education and implementation emerging as a new area of investigation. Full list of included studies is provided in Supplementary File 1. Conclusion The number of DLUS studies involving therapists continues to show international growth with studies investigating an increasing range of participant populations. Published studies now include research on DLUS adoption, implementation, and utility amongst all three of the therapy professions who use DLUS. The potential of DLUS and its direct impact on patient outcomes still needs to be explored further. However, DLUS remains a novel and innovative imaging technique in the hands of physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists as its utility continues to grow in various research, clinical and educational settings.
format Article
id doaj-art-21e98d5e50a649ed82357194591b361c
institution Kabale University
issn 2524-8987
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Ultrasound Journal
spelling doaj-art-21e98d5e50a649ed82357194591b361c2025-01-26T12:21:34ZengSpringerOpenThe Ultrasound Journal2524-89872025-01-011711910.1186/s13089-025-00412-wExploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists: an updated scoping reviewSimon Hayward0Camella Cardinael1Chloe Tait2Michael Reid3Andrew McCarthy4Physiotherapy Department, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustAcute Medicine Physiotherapy, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sharoe Green LanePhysiotherapy Department, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLibrary and Knowledge Services, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustPhysiotherapy Department, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustAbstract Background The adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists (“therapists”) to examine and assess the diaphragm and lungs continues to grow. The aim of this updated scoping review is to re-explore and re-collate the evidence around the adoption of DLUS by therapists. Methods This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Data sources searched included AMED, EmCare, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PubMed and Pedro. Grey literature sources were searched alongside communication with leading authors in the field. The Participants, Concept and Context (PCC) approach was employed to formulate the research question. A charting form was developed and piloted to extract: title, authors, year of publication, country of origin, professional group involved (population), lung or diaphragm ultrasound (concept), evaluation method, educational, clinical or research setting (context), subject/disease/patient group, sample size, study design and professional group performing DLUS. Results 133 studies met all inclusion criteria, an increase of 107 new studies compared to the original scoping review searches 7-years ago. Studies were included from 17 new countries and included 17 new participant populations. Lung ultrasound saw the largest increase in study number with education and implementation emerging as a new area of investigation. Full list of included studies is provided in Supplementary File 1. Conclusion The number of DLUS studies involving therapists continues to show international growth with studies investigating an increasing range of participant populations. Published studies now include research on DLUS adoption, implementation, and utility amongst all three of the therapy professions who use DLUS. The potential of DLUS and its direct impact on patient outcomes still needs to be explored further. However, DLUS remains a novel and innovative imaging technique in the hands of physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists as its utility continues to grow in various research, clinical and educational settings.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00412-wDiaphragmLungUltrasonographyPhysiotherapistPhysical therapistRespiratory therapist
spellingShingle Simon Hayward
Camella Cardinael
Chloe Tait
Michael Reid
Andrew McCarthy
Exploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists: an updated scoping review
The Ultrasound Journal
Diaphragm
Lung
Ultrasonography
Physiotherapist
Physical therapist
Respiratory therapist
title Exploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists: an updated scoping review
title_full Exploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists: an updated scoping review
title_fullStr Exploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists: an updated scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists: an updated scoping review
title_short Exploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound (DLUS) by physiotherapists, physical therapists, and respiratory therapists: an updated scoping review
title_sort exploring the adoption of diaphragm and lung ultrasound dlus by physiotherapists physical therapists and respiratory therapists an updated scoping review
topic Diaphragm
Lung
Ultrasonography
Physiotherapist
Physical therapist
Respiratory therapist
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00412-w
work_keys_str_mv AT simonhayward exploringtheadoptionofdiaphragmandlungultrasounddlusbyphysiotherapistsphysicaltherapistsandrespiratorytherapistsanupdatedscopingreview
AT camellacardinael exploringtheadoptionofdiaphragmandlungultrasounddlusbyphysiotherapistsphysicaltherapistsandrespiratorytherapistsanupdatedscopingreview
AT chloetait exploringtheadoptionofdiaphragmandlungultrasounddlusbyphysiotherapistsphysicaltherapistsandrespiratorytherapistsanupdatedscopingreview
AT michaelreid exploringtheadoptionofdiaphragmandlungultrasounddlusbyphysiotherapistsphysicaltherapistsandrespiratorytherapistsanupdatedscopingreview
AT andrewmccarthy exploringtheadoptionofdiaphragmandlungultrasounddlusbyphysiotherapistsphysicaltherapistsandrespiratorytherapistsanupdatedscopingreview