Wound Complications of Rapide vs Nylon Sutures in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Submission Type: Other Research Type: Level 3 - Retrospective cohort study, Case-control study, Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies Introduction/Purpose: Nylon sutures are the most commonly used sutures for closing surgical wounds and require a postoperative suture removal visit. Absorbable sutures imp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacob Priester MD, Christopher Kreulen MD, Eric Giza MD, Grace Hernandez MD, Austin Lee BS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-03-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011425S00087
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850039218546409472
author Jacob Priester MD
Christopher Kreulen MD
Eric Giza MD
Grace Hernandez MD
Austin Lee BS
author_facet Jacob Priester MD
Christopher Kreulen MD
Eric Giza MD
Grace Hernandez MD
Austin Lee BS
author_sort Jacob Priester MD
collection DOAJ
description Submission Type: Other Research Type: Level 3 - Retrospective cohort study, Case-control study, Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies Introduction/Purpose: Nylon sutures are the most commonly used sutures for closing surgical wounds and require a postoperative suture removal visit. Absorbable sutures improve patient satisfaction by circumventing these visits. The primary aim of this study is to analyze wound complication rates related to wound closure using nylon and Rapide sutures in foot and ankle surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at an academic medical center between 2014 and 2020. Patients over 18 years old who underwent foot and ankle surgery with Rapide or nylon sutures were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included type I or II diabetes, active pregnancy, incarceration, and preexisting infection. Patient demographic data, operation performed, and follow-up complications were collected for review. Descriptive statistics, data normalcy, and appropriate tests of significance were used to compare the rate of postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) and wound dehiscence across the two groups. Results: 1242 patients met our criteria. 863 were closed with nylon sutures (69.5%) and 378 with Rapide (30.5%). There was no significant difference between wound complications (3.18 vs. 3.69%), wound dehiscence (1.35 vs. 2.82%), or UROR (infection, 1.08 vs. 0.587% and dehiscence, 0.811 vs. 1.52%) between suture types. Conclusion: This study demonstrates no significant difference in wound complication rates after foot and ankle operations between those closed with Rapide and nylon sutures. With the potential benefits to clinic efficiency and decreased patient burden with absorbable suture use, this suggests a role for Rapide suture closures in foot and ankle surgery.
format Article
id doaj-art-21b2c65d1e64445f99cbc054fb65aae2
institution DOAJ
issn 2473-0114
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj-art-21b2c65d1e64445f99cbc054fb65aae22025-08-20T02:56:24ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142025-03-011010.1177/2473011425S00087Wound Complications of Rapide vs Nylon Sutures in Foot and Ankle SurgeryJacob Priester MDChristopher Kreulen MDEric Giza MDGrace Hernandez MDAustin Lee BSSubmission Type: Other Research Type: Level 3 - Retrospective cohort study, Case-control study, Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies Introduction/Purpose: Nylon sutures are the most commonly used sutures for closing surgical wounds and require a postoperative suture removal visit. Absorbable sutures improve patient satisfaction by circumventing these visits. The primary aim of this study is to analyze wound complication rates related to wound closure using nylon and Rapide sutures in foot and ankle surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at an academic medical center between 2014 and 2020. Patients over 18 years old who underwent foot and ankle surgery with Rapide or nylon sutures were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included type I or II diabetes, active pregnancy, incarceration, and preexisting infection. Patient demographic data, operation performed, and follow-up complications were collected for review. Descriptive statistics, data normalcy, and appropriate tests of significance were used to compare the rate of postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) and wound dehiscence across the two groups. Results: 1242 patients met our criteria. 863 were closed with nylon sutures (69.5%) and 378 with Rapide (30.5%). There was no significant difference between wound complications (3.18 vs. 3.69%), wound dehiscence (1.35 vs. 2.82%), or UROR (infection, 1.08 vs. 0.587% and dehiscence, 0.811 vs. 1.52%) between suture types. Conclusion: This study demonstrates no significant difference in wound complication rates after foot and ankle operations between those closed with Rapide and nylon sutures. With the potential benefits to clinic efficiency and decreased patient burden with absorbable suture use, this suggests a role for Rapide suture closures in foot and ankle surgery.https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011425S00087
spellingShingle Jacob Priester MD
Christopher Kreulen MD
Eric Giza MD
Grace Hernandez MD
Austin Lee BS
Wound Complications of Rapide vs Nylon Sutures in Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title Wound Complications of Rapide vs Nylon Sutures in Foot and Ankle Surgery
title_full Wound Complications of Rapide vs Nylon Sutures in Foot and Ankle Surgery
title_fullStr Wound Complications of Rapide vs Nylon Sutures in Foot and Ankle Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Wound Complications of Rapide vs Nylon Sutures in Foot and Ankle Surgery
title_short Wound Complications of Rapide vs Nylon Sutures in Foot and Ankle Surgery
title_sort wound complications of rapide vs nylon sutures in foot and ankle surgery
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011425S00087
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobpriestermd woundcomplicationsofrapidevsnylonsuturesinfootandanklesurgery
AT christopherkreulenmd woundcomplicationsofrapidevsnylonsuturesinfootandanklesurgery
AT ericgizamd woundcomplicationsofrapidevsnylonsuturesinfootandanklesurgery
AT gracehernandezmd woundcomplicationsofrapidevsnylonsuturesinfootandanklesurgery
AT austinleebs woundcomplicationsofrapidevsnylonsuturesinfootandanklesurgery