Feasibility of Using Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Pain in Persons with Parkinson's Disease

Objectives. To assess the feasibility of treating musculoskeletal pain in the lower back and/or lower extremities in persons with Parkinson's disease (PD) with cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES). Design. Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Setting. Veterans Affairs Medical Center,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diana H. Rintala, Gabriel Tan, Pamela Willson, Mon S. Bryant, Eugene C. H. Lai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010-01-01
Series:Parkinson's Disease
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/569154
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832565564859482112
author Diana H. Rintala
Gabriel Tan
Pamela Willson
Mon S. Bryant
Eugene C. H. Lai
author_facet Diana H. Rintala
Gabriel Tan
Pamela Willson
Mon S. Bryant
Eugene C. H. Lai
author_sort Diana H. Rintala
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. To assess the feasibility of treating musculoskeletal pain in the lower back and/or lower extremities in persons with Parkinson's disease (PD) with cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES). Design. Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Setting. Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Community. Participants. Nineteen persons with PD and pain in the lower back and/or lower extremities. Thirteen provided daily pain rating data. Intervention. Of the thirteen participants who provided daily pain data, 6 were randomly provided with active CES devices and 7 with sham devices to use at home 40 minutes per day for six weeks. They recorded their pain ratings on a 0-to-10 scale immediately before and after each session. Main Outcome Measure. Average daily change in pain intensity. Results. Persons receiving active CES had, on average, a 1.14-point decrease in pain compared with a 0.23-point decrease for those receiving sham CES (Wilcoxon Z=−2.20, P=.028). Conclusion. Use of CES at home by persons with PD is feasible and may be somewhat helpful in decreasing pain. A larger study is needed to determine the characteristics of persons who may experience meaningful pain reduction with CES. Guidelines for future studies are provided.
format Article
id doaj-art-217ad143a5b54f57a558feb75fe3f8cb
institution Kabale University
issn 2042-0080
language English
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Parkinson's Disease
spelling doaj-art-217ad143a5b54f57a558feb75fe3f8cb2025-02-03T01:07:14ZengWileyParkinson's Disease2042-00802010-01-01201010.4061/2010/569154569154Feasibility of Using Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Pain in Persons with Parkinson's DiseaseDiana H. Rintala0Gabriel Tan1Pamela Willson2Mon S. Bryant3Eugene C. H. Lai4Research Service, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USAResearch Service, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USAResearch Service, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USAResearch Service, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USAResearch Service, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USAObjectives. To assess the feasibility of treating musculoskeletal pain in the lower back and/or lower extremities in persons with Parkinson's disease (PD) with cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES). Design. Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Setting. Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Community. Participants. Nineteen persons with PD and pain in the lower back and/or lower extremities. Thirteen provided daily pain rating data. Intervention. Of the thirteen participants who provided daily pain data, 6 were randomly provided with active CES devices and 7 with sham devices to use at home 40 minutes per day for six weeks. They recorded their pain ratings on a 0-to-10 scale immediately before and after each session. Main Outcome Measure. Average daily change in pain intensity. Results. Persons receiving active CES had, on average, a 1.14-point decrease in pain compared with a 0.23-point decrease for those receiving sham CES (Wilcoxon Z=−2.20, P=.028). Conclusion. Use of CES at home by persons with PD is feasible and may be somewhat helpful in decreasing pain. A larger study is needed to determine the characteristics of persons who may experience meaningful pain reduction with CES. Guidelines for future studies are provided.http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/569154
spellingShingle Diana H. Rintala
Gabriel Tan
Pamela Willson
Mon S. Bryant
Eugene C. H. Lai
Feasibility of Using Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Pain in Persons with Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson's Disease
title Feasibility of Using Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Pain in Persons with Parkinson's Disease
title_full Feasibility of Using Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Pain in Persons with Parkinson's Disease
title_fullStr Feasibility of Using Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Pain in Persons with Parkinson's Disease
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Using Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Pain in Persons with Parkinson's Disease
title_short Feasibility of Using Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation for Pain in Persons with Parkinson's Disease
title_sort feasibility of using cranial electrotherapy stimulation for pain in persons with parkinson s disease
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/569154
work_keys_str_mv AT dianahrintala feasibilityofusingcranialelectrotherapystimulationforpaininpersonswithparkinsonsdisease
AT gabrieltan feasibilityofusingcranialelectrotherapystimulationforpaininpersonswithparkinsonsdisease
AT pamelawillson feasibilityofusingcranialelectrotherapystimulationforpaininpersonswithparkinsonsdisease
AT monsbryant feasibilityofusingcranialelectrotherapystimulationforpaininpersonswithparkinsonsdisease
AT eugenechlai feasibilityofusingcranialelectrotherapystimulationforpaininpersonswithparkinsonsdisease