Questions, queries, quibbles and quarrels
The South African Qualifications Authority was promulgated by enabling legislation through the SAQA Act (59 of 1995). The mandate of SAQA is quite simply to establish and maintain the National Qualifications Framework or NQF. This is a structure derived after study and investigation of a number of...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Johannesburg
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Communicare |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1818 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832593757112893440 |
|---|---|
| author | Annette Combrink |
| author_facet | Annette Combrink |
| author_sort | Annette Combrink |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The South African Qualifications Authority was promulgated by enabling legislation
through the SAQA Act (59 of 1995). The mandate of SAQA is quite simply to establish
and maintain the National Qualifications Framework or NQF. This is a structure derived
after study and investigation of a number of similar systems internationally, especially
in the USA, UK (more specifically Scotland), Australia and New Zealand. Note that all
the countries used as exemplars are developed countries. The philosophy underlying
this process emanates from the avowed intention to shift thinking from education for
employment to education about employability - to be effected via the critical crossfield outcomes, thus OBE. The upside of the process has been that SAQA has laudable
aims and objectives and is democratic with a strong emphasis on relevance. Some
serious hiccups in the system have led to the setting-up of the NQF Study Team being
appointed to scrutinise the activities and functionality of the NQF, and to ensure that
the work of SAQA be streamlined and accelerated. The SAQA structure as devised is
not user-friendly to higher education institutions. The recommendation by the Study
Team, that issues dealing with higher education should be transferred to the appropriate
structures, is strongly supported. This would make it possible, for example, to have a
more flexible and workable structure of qualifications and concomitant level descriptors.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2172fc77790c44198691788347212545 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0259-0069 2957-7950 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | University of Johannesburg |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Communicare |
| spelling | doaj-art-2172fc77790c441986917883472125452025-01-20T08:50:38ZengUniversity of JohannesburgCommunicare0259-00692957-79502022-10-0121210.36615/jcsa.v21i2.1818Questions, queries, quibbles and quarrelsAnnette Combrink0Northwest University The South African Qualifications Authority was promulgated by enabling legislation through the SAQA Act (59 of 1995). The mandate of SAQA is quite simply to establish and maintain the National Qualifications Framework or NQF. This is a structure derived after study and investigation of a number of similar systems internationally, especially in the USA, UK (more specifically Scotland), Australia and New Zealand. Note that all the countries used as exemplars are developed countries. The philosophy underlying this process emanates from the avowed intention to shift thinking from education for employment to education about employability - to be effected via the critical crossfield outcomes, thus OBE. The upside of the process has been that SAQA has laudable aims and objectives and is democratic with a strong emphasis on relevance. Some serious hiccups in the system have led to the setting-up of the NQF Study Team being appointed to scrutinise the activities and functionality of the NQF, and to ensure that the work of SAQA be streamlined and accelerated. The SAQA structure as devised is not user-friendly to higher education institutions. The recommendation by the Study Team, that issues dealing with higher education should be transferred to the appropriate structures, is strongly supported. This would make it possible, for example, to have a more flexible and workable structure of qualifications and concomitant level descriptors. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1818SAQANational Qualifications Framework or NQFphilosophyshift thinkingeducationemployment |
| spellingShingle | Annette Combrink Questions, queries, quibbles and quarrels Communicare SAQA National Qualifications Framework or NQF philosophy shift thinking education employment |
| title | Questions, queries, quibbles and quarrels |
| title_full | Questions, queries, quibbles and quarrels |
| title_fullStr | Questions, queries, quibbles and quarrels |
| title_full_unstemmed | Questions, queries, quibbles and quarrels |
| title_short | Questions, queries, quibbles and quarrels |
| title_sort | questions queries quibbles and quarrels |
| topic | SAQA National Qualifications Framework or NQF philosophy shift thinking education employment |
| url | https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/1818 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annettecombrink questionsqueriesquibblesandquarrels |