Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]

Background Research software is increasingly recognized as critical infrastructure in contemporary science. It spans a broad spectrum, including source code files, algorithms, scripts, computational workflows, and executables, all created for or during research. While research funders have developed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel S. Katz, Eric A. Jensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2025-01-01
Series:F1000Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1447/v2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087937765867520
author Daniel S. Katz
Eric A. Jensen
author_facet Daniel S. Katz
Eric A. Jensen
author_sort Daniel S. Katz
collection DOAJ
description Background Research software is increasingly recognized as critical infrastructure in contemporary science. It spans a broad spectrum, including source code files, algorithms, scripts, computational workflows, and executables, all created for or during research. While research funders have developed programs, initiatives, and policies to bolster research software’s role, there has been no empirical study of how these funders prioritize support for research software. Understanding their priorities is essential to clarify where current support is concentrated and to identify strategic gaps. Methods We conducted an online mixed methods survey of international research funders (n=36) to explore their priorities in supporting research software. The survey gathered data on the specific outcomes funders emphasize in their programs and initiatives for research software. Results The survey revealed that funders place strong emphasis on developing skills, promoting software sustainability, embedding open science practices, building community and collaboration, advancing research software funding mechanisms, increasing software visibility and use, fostering innovation, and ensuring security. Conclusions The findings highlight opportunities to enhance research software’s role through increased funder attention on professional recognition for software contributions and the non-technical, social aspects of research software sustainability. Addressing these areas could lead to more effective support and development of research software, ultimately benefitting the entire research ecosystem.
format Article
id doaj-art-214af4a591064fdbb2a413f04a0ff1b3
institution Kabale University
issn 2046-1402
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
record_format Article
series F1000Research
spelling doaj-art-214af4a591064fdbb2a413f04a0ff1b32025-02-06T01:00:01ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022025-01-0113176306Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]Daniel S. Katz0Eric A. Jensen1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8332-4507National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USANational Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USABackground Research software is increasingly recognized as critical infrastructure in contemporary science. It spans a broad spectrum, including source code files, algorithms, scripts, computational workflows, and executables, all created for or during research. While research funders have developed programs, initiatives, and policies to bolster research software’s role, there has been no empirical study of how these funders prioritize support for research software. Understanding their priorities is essential to clarify where current support is concentrated and to identify strategic gaps. Methods We conducted an online mixed methods survey of international research funders (n=36) to explore their priorities in supporting research software. The survey gathered data on the specific outcomes funders emphasize in their programs and initiatives for research software. Results The survey revealed that funders place strong emphasis on developing skills, promoting software sustainability, embedding open science practices, building community and collaboration, advancing research software funding mechanisms, increasing software visibility and use, fostering innovation, and ensuring security. Conclusions The findings highlight opportunities to enhance research software’s role through increased funder attention on professional recognition for software contributions and the non-technical, social aspects of research software sustainability. Addressing these areas could lead to more effective support and development of research software, ultimately benefitting the entire research ecosystem.https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1447/v2Research software research policy research funding science systems FAIR open scienceeng
spellingShingle Daniel S. Katz
Eric A. Jensen
Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
F1000Research
Research software
research policy
research funding
science systems
FAIR
open science
eng
title Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
title_full Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
title_fullStr Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
title_full_unstemmed Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
title_short Strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding: Results from an international survey [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
title_sort strategic priorities and challenges in research software funding results from an international survey version 2 peer review 2 approved 1 approved with reservations 1 not approved
topic Research software
research policy
research funding
science systems
FAIR
open science
eng
url https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1447/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT danielskatz strategicprioritiesandchallengesinresearchsoftwarefundingresultsfromaninternationalsurveyversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations1notapproved
AT ericajensen strategicprioritiesandchallengesinresearchsoftwarefundingresultsfromaninternationalsurveyversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations1notapproved