Brain connectivity for constructing new face representations in typical adults versus a prosopagnosic patient

Will our brains get to know a new face better if we look at its external features first? Here we offer neurophysiological evidence of the relevance of external versus internal facial features for constructing new face representations, by contrasting successful face processing with a prototypical cas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ela I. Olivares, Jorge F. Bosch-Bayard, Ana S. Urraca, Alba Jiménez-Bascuñán, Rolando J. Biscay, Jaime Iglesias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:NeuroImage
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811925000412
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087675560001536
author Ela I. Olivares
Jorge F. Bosch-Bayard
Ana S. Urraca
Alba Jiménez-Bascuñán
Rolando J. Biscay
Jaime Iglesias
author_facet Ela I. Olivares
Jorge F. Bosch-Bayard
Ana S. Urraca
Alba Jiménez-Bascuñán
Rolando J. Biscay
Jaime Iglesias
author_sort Ela I. Olivares
collection DOAJ
description Will our brains get to know a new face better if we look at its external features first? Here we offer neurophysiological evidence of the relevance of external versus internal facial features for constructing new face representations, by contrasting successful face processing with a prototypical case of face agnosia. A woman with acquired prosopagnosia (E.C.) and 14 age-matched typical participants (7 women) were exposed to a face-feature matching task. External (E), internal (I) features, and whole target faces of unknown individuals (from an IdentiKit gallery) were displayed according to two different sequences: E →I→whole faces, or I→E→whole faces. Then, we studied the induced EEG activity using ‘isolated effective coherence’ to analyse the intracortical causal information flow among face-sensitive nodes. Initial presentation of external features (E before I), when compared to internal ones, triggered connections encompassing extensively the right-hemisphere face processing pathway [from posterior visual cortices for initial structural analysis, towards both intermediate (occipitotemporal) and high-level (prefrontal) relay stations], in which face-identity is thought to emerge progressively. Also, whereas exposure to internal features as second stimulus seemed to demand some sort of basic visual processing, external features triggered again more widespread and integrative connections. Connections for whole faces closing the E-I sequence resembled those for external features initiating the same sequence. Meanwhile, the predominant connections for whole faces completing the I-E sequence were more restricted to specific brain areas, with relevant prefrontal activity and a few connected nodes in right posterior regions, suggesting high attentional load plus initial and intermediate processing of face identity. Interestingly, the pattern of connections that distinguished typical participants from E.C. in the I-E sequence was the recruitment of left posterior visual regions, presumably underlying analytical subroutines for structural encoding of facial stimuli. These findings support that initial exposure to external features, followed by internal ones, provides the best visual cue to acquire new face configurations. Nevertheless, in case of face agnosia after right posterior damage, relying preferentially on internal features and left hemisphere specialized subroutines might be an alternative for cognitive training.
format Article
id doaj-art-20ee1d2d60e34ff98012ebd504b495f3
institution Kabale University
issn 1095-9572
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series NeuroImage
spelling doaj-art-20ee1d2d60e34ff98012ebd504b495f32025-02-06T05:11:08ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722025-02-01307121039Brain connectivity for constructing new face representations in typical adults versus a prosopagnosic patientEla I. Olivares0Jorge F. Bosch-Bayard1Ana S. Urraca2Alba Jiménez-Bascuñán3Rolando J. Biscay4Jaime Iglesias5Department of Biological and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Campus de Cantoblanco, Calle Iván Pávlov 6, Madrid 28049, Spain; Corresponding author.Department of Biological and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Campus de Cantoblanco, Calle Iván Pávlov 6, Madrid 28049, SpainCentro Universitario Cardenal Cisneros, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid 28006, SpainDepartment of Biological and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Campus de Cantoblanco, Calle Iván Pávlov 6, Madrid 28049, SpainCentro de Investigación en Matemáticas, Guanajuato 36023, MexicoDepartment of Biological and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Campus de Cantoblanco, Calle Iván Pávlov 6, Madrid 28049, SpainWill our brains get to know a new face better if we look at its external features first? Here we offer neurophysiological evidence of the relevance of external versus internal facial features for constructing new face representations, by contrasting successful face processing with a prototypical case of face agnosia. A woman with acquired prosopagnosia (E.C.) and 14 age-matched typical participants (7 women) were exposed to a face-feature matching task. External (E), internal (I) features, and whole target faces of unknown individuals (from an IdentiKit gallery) were displayed according to two different sequences: E →I→whole faces, or I→E→whole faces. Then, we studied the induced EEG activity using ‘isolated effective coherence’ to analyse the intracortical causal information flow among face-sensitive nodes. Initial presentation of external features (E before I), when compared to internal ones, triggered connections encompassing extensively the right-hemisphere face processing pathway [from posterior visual cortices for initial structural analysis, towards both intermediate (occipitotemporal) and high-level (prefrontal) relay stations], in which face-identity is thought to emerge progressively. Also, whereas exposure to internal features as second stimulus seemed to demand some sort of basic visual processing, external features triggered again more widespread and integrative connections. Connections for whole faces closing the E-I sequence resembled those for external features initiating the same sequence. Meanwhile, the predominant connections for whole faces completing the I-E sequence were more restricted to specific brain areas, with relevant prefrontal activity and a few connected nodes in right posterior regions, suggesting high attentional load plus initial and intermediate processing of face identity. Interestingly, the pattern of connections that distinguished typical participants from E.C. in the I-E sequence was the recruitment of left posterior visual regions, presumably underlying analytical subroutines for structural encoding of facial stimuli. These findings support that initial exposure to external features, followed by internal ones, provides the best visual cue to acquire new face configurations. Nevertheless, in case of face agnosia after right posterior damage, relying preferentially on internal features and left hemisphere specialized subroutines might be an alternative for cognitive training.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811925000412EEGFace perceptionFacial featuresIsolated effective coherenceProsopagnosia
spellingShingle Ela I. Olivares
Jorge F. Bosch-Bayard
Ana S. Urraca
Alba Jiménez-Bascuñán
Rolando J. Biscay
Jaime Iglesias
Brain connectivity for constructing new face representations in typical adults versus a prosopagnosic patient
NeuroImage
EEG
Face perception
Facial features
Isolated effective coherence
Prosopagnosia
title Brain connectivity for constructing new face representations in typical adults versus a prosopagnosic patient
title_full Brain connectivity for constructing new face representations in typical adults versus a prosopagnosic patient
title_fullStr Brain connectivity for constructing new face representations in typical adults versus a prosopagnosic patient
title_full_unstemmed Brain connectivity for constructing new face representations in typical adults versus a prosopagnosic patient
title_short Brain connectivity for constructing new face representations in typical adults versus a prosopagnosic patient
title_sort brain connectivity for constructing new face representations in typical adults versus a prosopagnosic patient
topic EEG
Face perception
Facial features
Isolated effective coherence
Prosopagnosia
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811925000412
work_keys_str_mv AT elaiolivares brainconnectivityforconstructingnewfacerepresentationsintypicaladultsversusaprosopagnosicpatient
AT jorgefboschbayard brainconnectivityforconstructingnewfacerepresentationsintypicaladultsversusaprosopagnosicpatient
AT anasurraca brainconnectivityforconstructingnewfacerepresentationsintypicaladultsversusaprosopagnosicpatient
AT albajimenezbascunan brainconnectivityforconstructingnewfacerepresentationsintypicaladultsversusaprosopagnosicpatient
AT rolandojbiscay brainconnectivityforconstructingnewfacerepresentationsintypicaladultsversusaprosopagnosicpatient
AT jaimeiglesias brainconnectivityforconstructingnewfacerepresentationsintypicaladultsversusaprosopagnosicpatient