The clinical value of short-term insemination: a retrospective analysis of 3496 patients

Abstract Background The safety and effectiveness of short-term insemination remain a subject of controversy. This study aims to investigate the impact of short-term insemination on both embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes and whether it is necessary to apply short-term insemination to all patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xinyue Zhang, Yufeng Wang, Jihong Yang, Yangbai Li, Yao Chen, Yingying Yang, Ting Feng, Suying Li, Li Chen, Yun Qian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07151-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594321956667392
author Xinyue Zhang
Yufeng Wang
Jihong Yang
Yangbai Li
Yao Chen
Yingying Yang
Ting Feng
Suying Li
Li Chen
Yun Qian
author_facet Xinyue Zhang
Yufeng Wang
Jihong Yang
Yangbai Li
Yao Chen
Yingying Yang
Ting Feng
Suying Li
Li Chen
Yun Qian
author_sort Xinyue Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The safety and effectiveness of short-term insemination remain a subject of controversy. This study aims to investigate the impact of short-term insemination on both embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes and whether it is necessary to apply short-term insemination to all patients underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 3,496 patients from two centers over the period January 2016 to December 2022. Of these, 1307 patients underwent IVF, 1656 patients were treated with short-term IVF, 166 patients received early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (R-ICSI) and 367 patients were treated with ICSI. The clinical and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results The rate of high-quality embryos was significantly lower in the short-term IVF group compared to the routine IVF group (59.89% vs. 68.16%) (P = 0.000), the rate of blastocyst formation was significantly lower in the short-term IVF group compared to the routine IVF group (44.99% vs. 61.34%) (P = 0.000). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or neonatal outcomes between the two groups, irrespective of whether fresh or frozen embryos were used (both P > 0.05). The incidence of ≥ 3PN demonstrated no significant difference between the early R-ICSI and ICSI groups (1.04% vs. 0.66%) (P = 0.114), furthermore, the clinical outcomes were similar in both groups, for both fresh and frozen embryos (both P > 0.05). Conclusions For patients with primary fertility, short-term IVF combined with early R-ICSI can effectively prevent potential low fertilization or fertilization failure, reduce the risk of patients with no transferable embryo, avoid the waste of resources and had no adverse effects on neonatal outcomes. However, short-term IVF reduced the oocytes utilization rate in one single oocyte pick-up cycle, for patients with no risk factors for fertilization failure, the overnight fertilization is still one of the most important ways of insemination worthy of affirmation. Trial registration NA.
format Article
id doaj-art-1fe16a256c924dc9a81cbec9be8d82a4
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2393
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj-art-1fe16a256c924dc9a81cbec9be8d82a42025-01-19T12:42:42ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932025-01-0125111410.1186/s12884-025-07151-9The clinical value of short-term insemination: a retrospective analysis of 3496 patientsXinyue Zhang0Yufeng Wang1Jihong Yang2Yangbai Li3Yao Chen4Yingying Yang5Ting Feng6Suying Li7Li Chen8Yun Qian9Reproductive Obstetrics and Gynecology Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical UniversityReproductive Obstetrics and Gynecology Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityReproductive Obstetrics and Gynecology Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityReproductive Obstetrics and Gynecology Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical UniversityReproductive Obstetrics and Gynecology Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityReproductive Obstetrics and Gynecology Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, Changzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical UniversityReproductive Obstetrics and Gynecology Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityAbstract Background The safety and effectiveness of short-term insemination remain a subject of controversy. This study aims to investigate the impact of short-term insemination on both embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes and whether it is necessary to apply short-term insemination to all patients underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 3,496 patients from two centers over the period January 2016 to December 2022. Of these, 1307 patients underwent IVF, 1656 patients were treated with short-term IVF, 166 patients received early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (R-ICSI) and 367 patients were treated with ICSI. The clinical and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results The rate of high-quality embryos was significantly lower in the short-term IVF group compared to the routine IVF group (59.89% vs. 68.16%) (P = 0.000), the rate of blastocyst formation was significantly lower in the short-term IVF group compared to the routine IVF group (44.99% vs. 61.34%) (P = 0.000). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or neonatal outcomes between the two groups, irrespective of whether fresh or frozen embryos were used (both P > 0.05). The incidence of ≥ 3PN demonstrated no significant difference between the early R-ICSI and ICSI groups (1.04% vs. 0.66%) (P = 0.114), furthermore, the clinical outcomes were similar in both groups, for both fresh and frozen embryos (both P > 0.05). Conclusions For patients with primary fertility, short-term IVF combined with early R-ICSI can effectively prevent potential low fertilization or fertilization failure, reduce the risk of patients with no transferable embryo, avoid the waste of resources and had no adverse effects on neonatal outcomes. However, short-term IVF reduced the oocytes utilization rate in one single oocyte pick-up cycle, for patients with no risk factors for fertilization failure, the overnight fertilization is still one of the most important ways of insemination worthy of affirmation. Trial registration NA.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07151-9Short-term in vitro fertilizationEarly rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injectionEmbryo qualityPregnancy outcome
spellingShingle Xinyue Zhang
Yufeng Wang
Jihong Yang
Yangbai Li
Yao Chen
Yingying Yang
Ting Feng
Suying Li
Li Chen
Yun Qian
The clinical value of short-term insemination: a retrospective analysis of 3496 patients
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Short-term in vitro fertilization
Early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Embryo quality
Pregnancy outcome
title The clinical value of short-term insemination: a retrospective analysis of 3496 patients
title_full The clinical value of short-term insemination: a retrospective analysis of 3496 patients
title_fullStr The clinical value of short-term insemination: a retrospective analysis of 3496 patients
title_full_unstemmed The clinical value of short-term insemination: a retrospective analysis of 3496 patients
title_short The clinical value of short-term insemination: a retrospective analysis of 3496 patients
title_sort clinical value of short term insemination a retrospective analysis of 3496 patients
topic Short-term in vitro fertilization
Early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Embryo quality
Pregnancy outcome
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07151-9
work_keys_str_mv AT xinyuezhang theclinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT yufengwang theclinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT jihongyang theclinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT yangbaili theclinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT yaochen theclinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT yingyingyang theclinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT tingfeng theclinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT suyingli theclinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT lichen theclinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT yunqian theclinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT xinyuezhang clinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT yufengwang clinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT jihongyang clinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT yangbaili clinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT yaochen clinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT yingyingyang clinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT tingfeng clinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT suyingli clinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT lichen clinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients
AT yunqian clinicalvalueofshortterminseminationaretrospectiveanalysisof3496patients