Effect of 4DryField® PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis

Background. Adhesions occur after up to 97% of abdominal interventions causing chronic pain, infertility, and intestinal obstruction. Various concepts to prevent adhesions have been presented but mostly either have low efficacy or are not applicable in resective intestinal surgery or incomplete hemo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerhard Blumhardt, Matthias Haas, Stefanie Polte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Surgery
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9628742
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554690335735808
author Gerhard Blumhardt
Matthias Haas
Stefanie Polte
author_facet Gerhard Blumhardt
Matthias Haas
Stefanie Polte
author_sort Gerhard Blumhardt
collection DOAJ
description Background. Adhesions occur after up to 97% of abdominal interventions causing chronic pain, infertility, and intestinal obstruction. Various concepts to prevent adhesions have been presented but mostly either have low efficacy or are not applicable in resective intestinal surgery or incomplete hemostasis. In this retrospective one-center clinical trial, the course of patients with extensive abdominal adhesiolysis and application of a recent starch-based formulation, 4DryField PH (4DF), is analyzed. Case Report. Five female patients (age 65–83 years) underwent extensive open adhesiolysis with application of 4DF gel for adhesion prevention, premixed extracorporeally with saline or Ringer’s solution (60–70 mL per 5 g 4DF) for homogeneous gel distribution on intestinal loops and in the peritoneal cavity. In addition, dry 4DF powder was dispersed on the greater omentum and subsequently transformed into a gel by dripping with saline or Ringer’s solution directly before abdominal closure. Patients were followed up for more than two years, except for one patient who died after nine months due to metastases. One patient with complex situation due to Gore-Tex mesh in the lower abdomen showed no adhesions at scheduled second-look operation but after six months had relaparotomy for adhesiolysis. All other patients have remained free of adhesions or adhesion-related symptoms during follow-up. Conclusion. Considering the extent and complexity of adhesions, treatment with 4DF gel for adhesion prevention after open adhesiolysis appears promising. Prospective randomized trials should further elaborate on this clinical concept.
format Article
id doaj-art-1fc93856dd2e4e9ebda3dedba8858c7c
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6900
2090-6919
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Surgery
spelling doaj-art-1fc93856dd2e4e9ebda3dedba8858c7c2025-02-03T05:50:46ZengWileyCase Reports in Surgery2090-69002090-69192018-01-01201810.1155/2018/96287429628742Effect of 4DryField® PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral AdhesiolysisGerhard Blumhardt0Matthias Haas1Stefanie Polte2Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Unna, Holbeinstr. 10, 59423 Unna, GermanyDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Unna, Holbeinstr. 10, 59423 Unna, GermanyDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Unna, Holbeinstr. 10, 59423 Unna, GermanyBackground. Adhesions occur after up to 97% of abdominal interventions causing chronic pain, infertility, and intestinal obstruction. Various concepts to prevent adhesions have been presented but mostly either have low efficacy or are not applicable in resective intestinal surgery or incomplete hemostasis. In this retrospective one-center clinical trial, the course of patients with extensive abdominal adhesiolysis and application of a recent starch-based formulation, 4DryField PH (4DF), is analyzed. Case Report. Five female patients (age 65–83 years) underwent extensive open adhesiolysis with application of 4DF gel for adhesion prevention, premixed extracorporeally with saline or Ringer’s solution (60–70 mL per 5 g 4DF) for homogeneous gel distribution on intestinal loops and in the peritoneal cavity. In addition, dry 4DF powder was dispersed on the greater omentum and subsequently transformed into a gel by dripping with saline or Ringer’s solution directly before abdominal closure. Patients were followed up for more than two years, except for one patient who died after nine months due to metastases. One patient with complex situation due to Gore-Tex mesh in the lower abdomen showed no adhesions at scheduled second-look operation but after six months had relaparotomy for adhesiolysis. All other patients have remained free of adhesions or adhesion-related symptoms during follow-up. Conclusion. Considering the extent and complexity of adhesions, treatment with 4DF gel for adhesion prevention after open adhesiolysis appears promising. Prospective randomized trials should further elaborate on this clinical concept.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9628742
spellingShingle Gerhard Blumhardt
Matthias Haas
Stefanie Polte
Effect of 4DryField® PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
Case Reports in Surgery
title Effect of 4DryField® PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
title_full Effect of 4DryField® PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
title_fullStr Effect of 4DryField® PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of 4DryField® PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
title_short Effect of 4DryField® PH, a Novel Adhesion Barrier, on Recurrence of Intestinal Adhesions after Extensive Visceral Adhesiolysis
title_sort effect of 4dryfield r ph a novel adhesion barrier on recurrence of intestinal adhesions after extensive visceral adhesiolysis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9628742
work_keys_str_mv AT gerhardblumhardt effectof4dryfieldphanoveladhesionbarrieronrecurrenceofintestinaladhesionsafterextensivevisceraladhesiolysis
AT matthiashaas effectof4dryfieldphanoveladhesionbarrieronrecurrenceofintestinaladhesionsafterextensivevisceraladhesiolysis
AT stefaniepolte effectof4dryfieldphanoveladhesionbarrieronrecurrenceofintestinaladhesionsafterextensivevisceraladhesiolysis