Silvicultural Attempts to Induce Browse Resistance in Conifer Seedlings

A multiyear study was conducted to determine if soil amendment combined with topical application of elemental sulfur could be employed to reduce deer browse damage to four conifer species. Fertilizer and sulfur were applied to conifer seedlings at seven sites near Corvallis, OR. Growth and browse d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruce A. Kimball, Fred Pfund, Mark Gourley, Doreen L. Griffin, John H. Russell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011-01-01
Series:International Journal of Forestry Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/108529
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832564389178245120
author Bruce A. Kimball
Fred Pfund
Mark Gourley
Doreen L. Griffin
John H. Russell
author_facet Bruce A. Kimball
Fred Pfund
Mark Gourley
Doreen L. Griffin
John H. Russell
author_sort Bruce A. Kimball
collection DOAJ
description A multiyear study was conducted to determine if soil amendment combined with topical application of elemental sulfur could be employed to reduce deer browse damage to four conifer species. Fertilizer and sulfur were applied to conifer seedlings at seven sites near Corvallis, OR. Growth and browse damage data were collected for all seedlings over a period of 17 months. Additionally, foliar concentrations of monoterpenes and simple carbohydrates were assessed in western redcedar (Thuja plicata) seedlings over a period of three years. Fertilization and sulfur treatments had a moderate impact on growth and no influence on browse damage or the chemical responses. Over the course of the study, browse damage diminished while foliar monoterpene concentrations increased in redcedar. It appears that silvicultural manipulation via sulfur application and/or soil amendment cannot accelerate or alter the ontogenetical changes that may naturally defend seedlings against mammalian herbivores. In a brief trial with captive deer, redcedar browse resistance was influenced by seedling maturation, but not monoterpene content. Other maturation effects may yield significant browse protection to young seedlings.
format Article
id doaj-art-1f9fca37792148288ff0f696aa7c4bc8
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-9368
1687-9376
language English
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Forestry Research
spelling doaj-art-1f9fca37792148288ff0f696aa7c4bc82025-02-03T01:11:05ZengWileyInternational Journal of Forestry Research1687-93681687-93762011-01-01201110.1155/2011/108529108529Silvicultural Attempts to Induce Browse Resistance in Conifer SeedlingsBruce A. Kimball0Fred Pfund1Mark Gourley2Doreen L. Griffin3John H. Russell4United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USAStarker Forests, Inc., 7240 SW Philomath Boulevard, Corvallis, OR 97339, USAStarker Forests, Inc., 7240 SW Philomath Boulevard, Corvallis, OR 97339, USAUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USABritish Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range, Research, Innovation and Knowledge Management Branch, Cowichan Lake Research Station, P.O. Box 335, 7060 Forestry Road, Mesachie Lake, BC, V0R 2N0, CanadaA multiyear study was conducted to determine if soil amendment combined with topical application of elemental sulfur could be employed to reduce deer browse damage to four conifer species. Fertilizer and sulfur were applied to conifer seedlings at seven sites near Corvallis, OR. Growth and browse damage data were collected for all seedlings over a period of 17 months. Additionally, foliar concentrations of monoterpenes and simple carbohydrates were assessed in western redcedar (Thuja plicata) seedlings over a period of three years. Fertilization and sulfur treatments had a moderate impact on growth and no influence on browse damage or the chemical responses. Over the course of the study, browse damage diminished while foliar monoterpene concentrations increased in redcedar. It appears that silvicultural manipulation via sulfur application and/or soil amendment cannot accelerate or alter the ontogenetical changes that may naturally defend seedlings against mammalian herbivores. In a brief trial with captive deer, redcedar browse resistance was influenced by seedling maturation, but not monoterpene content. Other maturation effects may yield significant browse protection to young seedlings.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/108529
spellingShingle Bruce A. Kimball
Fred Pfund
Mark Gourley
Doreen L. Griffin
John H. Russell
Silvicultural Attempts to Induce Browse Resistance in Conifer Seedlings
International Journal of Forestry Research
title Silvicultural Attempts to Induce Browse Resistance in Conifer Seedlings
title_full Silvicultural Attempts to Induce Browse Resistance in Conifer Seedlings
title_fullStr Silvicultural Attempts to Induce Browse Resistance in Conifer Seedlings
title_full_unstemmed Silvicultural Attempts to Induce Browse Resistance in Conifer Seedlings
title_short Silvicultural Attempts to Induce Browse Resistance in Conifer Seedlings
title_sort silvicultural attempts to induce browse resistance in conifer seedlings
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/108529
work_keys_str_mv AT bruceakimball silviculturalattemptstoinducebrowseresistanceinconiferseedlings
AT fredpfund silviculturalattemptstoinducebrowseresistanceinconiferseedlings
AT markgourley silviculturalattemptstoinducebrowseresistanceinconiferseedlings
AT doreenlgriffin silviculturalattemptstoinducebrowseresistanceinconiferseedlings
AT johnhrussell silviculturalattemptstoinducebrowseresistanceinconiferseedlings