From Multivalent Writing to a Poetics of the Book: A Media-Specific Analysis of Mary Ruefle’s A Little White Shadow
Mary Ruefle’s A Little White Shadow (2006) asks the reader to consider the book as more than a container for poetry by playing with our expectations of print books: namely stability, permanence, and authority. This work of erasure reproduces the marks Ruefle made to obscure words in the source text...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Centre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte"
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | Sillages Critiques |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/13864 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832578523677589504 |
|---|---|
| author | Catherine Ann Winters |
| author_facet | Catherine Ann Winters |
| author_sort | Catherine Ann Winters |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Mary Ruefle’s A Little White Shadow (2006) asks the reader to consider the book as more than a container for poetry by playing with our expectations of print books: namely stability, permanence, and authority. This work of erasure reproduces the marks Ruefle made to obscure words in the source text of the same name by Emily Malbone Morgan, published in 1889, by creating a facsimile of the original altered with white correction fluid. By utilizing the material object as an essential element of the poem, Ruefle engages this form to move beyond the concept of the book as object or apparatus for presenting poetry. She achieves this by physically erasing an already historically “erased” book – a text that was largely unavailable and unremembered at the time Ruefle published her poem – that treats themes of writing, reading, and literature. This aligns with Johanna Drucker’s definition of the artist’s book as a fine arts practice that interrogates the form and meaning of the medium and questions what a book is. Through this same relationship of form and content, Ruefle develops a poetics of the book. Ultimately, she rejects the idea that the poetry book is dead with the caveat that the codex as a de facto form that does not affect the meaning of the poetry is dying. Instead, Ruefle weaves our expectations and assumptions about the medium into her erasure poem to make this formerly default form an active part of her project. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-1f31b1fbd4a34ab28f18e84175b111ea |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1272-3819 1969-6302 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | Centre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte" |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sillages Critiques |
| spelling | doaj-art-1f31b1fbd4a34ab28f18e84175b111ea2025-01-30T13:47:47ZengCentre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte"Sillages Critiques1272-38191969-63022022-12-013310.4000/sillagescritiques.13864From Multivalent Writing to a Poetics of the Book: A Media-Specific Analysis of Mary Ruefle’s A Little White ShadowCatherine Ann WintersMary Ruefle’s A Little White Shadow (2006) asks the reader to consider the book as more than a container for poetry by playing with our expectations of print books: namely stability, permanence, and authority. This work of erasure reproduces the marks Ruefle made to obscure words in the source text of the same name by Emily Malbone Morgan, published in 1889, by creating a facsimile of the original altered with white correction fluid. By utilizing the material object as an essential element of the poem, Ruefle engages this form to move beyond the concept of the book as object or apparatus for presenting poetry. She achieves this by physically erasing an already historically “erased” book – a text that was largely unavailable and unremembered at the time Ruefle published her poem – that treats themes of writing, reading, and literature. This aligns with Johanna Drucker’s definition of the artist’s book as a fine arts practice that interrogates the form and meaning of the medium and questions what a book is. Through this same relationship of form and content, Ruefle develops a poetics of the book. Ultimately, she rejects the idea that the poetry book is dead with the caveat that the codex as a de facto form that does not affect the meaning of the poetry is dying. Instead, Ruefle weaves our expectations and assumptions about the medium into her erasure poem to make this formerly default form an active part of her project.https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/13864A Little White ShadowRuefle (Mary)poetry bookmedium theoryerasure poetryartist’s book |
| spellingShingle | Catherine Ann Winters From Multivalent Writing to a Poetics of the Book: A Media-Specific Analysis of Mary Ruefle’s A Little White Shadow Sillages Critiques A Little White Shadow Ruefle (Mary) poetry book medium theory erasure poetry artist’s book |
| title | From Multivalent Writing to a Poetics of the Book: A Media-Specific Analysis of Mary Ruefle’s A Little White Shadow |
| title_full | From Multivalent Writing to a Poetics of the Book: A Media-Specific Analysis of Mary Ruefle’s A Little White Shadow |
| title_fullStr | From Multivalent Writing to a Poetics of the Book: A Media-Specific Analysis of Mary Ruefle’s A Little White Shadow |
| title_full_unstemmed | From Multivalent Writing to a Poetics of the Book: A Media-Specific Analysis of Mary Ruefle’s A Little White Shadow |
| title_short | From Multivalent Writing to a Poetics of the Book: A Media-Specific Analysis of Mary Ruefle’s A Little White Shadow |
| title_sort | from multivalent writing to a poetics of the book a media specific analysis of mary ruefle s a little white shadow |
| topic | A Little White Shadow Ruefle (Mary) poetry book medium theory erasure poetry artist’s book |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/13864 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT catherineannwinters frommultivalentwritingtoapoeticsofthebookamediaspecificanalysisofmaryrueflesalittlewhiteshadow |