Biomechanical Evaluation of a Spinal Surgical Instrument: A Numerical–Experimental Approach

Background/Objectives: The conventional practice in clinical settings involves using multi-use surgical instrumentation (SI). However, there is a growing trend towards transforming these multi-use SIs into disposable surgical instruments, driven by economic and environmental considerations without c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luca Ciriello, Tomaso Villa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
Series:Biomechanics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7078/5/2/26
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849418249567993856
author Luca Ciriello
Tomaso Villa
author_facet Luca Ciriello
Tomaso Villa
author_sort Luca Ciriello
collection DOAJ
description Background/Objectives: The conventional practice in clinical settings involves using multi-use surgical instrumentation (SI). However, there is a growing trend towards transforming these multi-use SIs into disposable surgical instruments, driven by economic and environmental considerations without considering the biomechanical aspects. This study focuses on redesigning an SI kit for implanting cervical spinal facet cages. Understanding the boundary conditions (forces, torques, and bending moments) acting on the SI during surgery is crucial for optimizing its design and materials. Therefore, this study aims to develop a measurement system (MS) to record these loads during implantation and validate it through in vitro testing. Methods: A combined numerical–experimental approach was used to design and calibrate the MS. Finite element analysis (FE) was used to optimize the geometry of the sensitive element of the MS. This was followed by the manufacturing phase using 3D printing and then by calibration tests to determine the stiffness of the system. Finally, the MS was used to measure the boundary conditions applied during SI use during in vitro tests on a cervical Sawbone spine. Results: After designing the measurement system (MS) via finite element analysis, calibration tests determined stiffness values of K<sub>F</sub> = 1.2385 N/(µm/m) (axial compression), K<sub>T</sub> = −0.0015 Nm/(µm/m) (torque), and K<sub>B</sub> = 0.0242 Nm/(µm/m) (non-axial force). In vitro tests identified maximum loads of 40.84 N (compression) and 0.11 Nm (torque). Conclusions: This study developed a measurement system to assess surgical implant boundary conditions. The data will support finite element modeling, guiding the optimization of implant design and materials.
format Article
id doaj-art-1f13a697e7cd461c83679f6bb2d3d1d8
institution Kabale University
issn 2673-7078
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Biomechanics
spelling doaj-art-1f13a697e7cd461c83679f6bb2d3d1d82025-08-20T03:32:28ZengMDPI AGBiomechanics2673-70782025-04-01522610.3390/biomechanics5020026Biomechanical Evaluation of a Spinal Surgical Instrument: A Numerical–Experimental ApproachLuca Ciriello0Tomaso Villa1Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”-LaBS, 20133 Politecnico di Milano, ItalyDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”-LaBS, 20133 Politecnico di Milano, ItalyBackground/Objectives: The conventional practice in clinical settings involves using multi-use surgical instrumentation (SI). However, there is a growing trend towards transforming these multi-use SIs into disposable surgical instruments, driven by economic and environmental considerations without considering the biomechanical aspects. This study focuses on redesigning an SI kit for implanting cervical spinal facet cages. Understanding the boundary conditions (forces, torques, and bending moments) acting on the SI during surgery is crucial for optimizing its design and materials. Therefore, this study aims to develop a measurement system (MS) to record these loads during implantation and validate it through in vitro testing. Methods: A combined numerical–experimental approach was used to design and calibrate the MS. Finite element analysis (FE) was used to optimize the geometry of the sensitive element of the MS. This was followed by the manufacturing phase using 3D printing and then by calibration tests to determine the stiffness of the system. Finally, the MS was used to measure the boundary conditions applied during SI use during in vitro tests on a cervical Sawbone spine. Results: After designing the measurement system (MS) via finite element analysis, calibration tests determined stiffness values of K<sub>F</sub> = 1.2385 N/(µm/m) (axial compression), K<sub>T</sub> = −0.0015 Nm/(µm/m) (torque), and K<sub>B</sub> = 0.0242 Nm/(µm/m) (non-axial force). In vitro tests identified maximum loads of 40.84 N (compression) and 0.11 Nm (torque). Conclusions: This study developed a measurement system to assess surgical implant boundary conditions. The data will support finite element modeling, guiding the optimization of implant design and materials.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7078/5/2/26single-use surgical instrumentcervical spinein vitro test
spellingShingle Luca Ciriello
Tomaso Villa
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Spinal Surgical Instrument: A Numerical–Experimental Approach
Biomechanics
single-use surgical instrument
cervical spine
in vitro test
title Biomechanical Evaluation of a Spinal Surgical Instrument: A Numerical–Experimental Approach
title_full Biomechanical Evaluation of a Spinal Surgical Instrument: A Numerical–Experimental Approach
title_fullStr Biomechanical Evaluation of a Spinal Surgical Instrument: A Numerical–Experimental Approach
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Evaluation of a Spinal Surgical Instrument: A Numerical–Experimental Approach
title_short Biomechanical Evaluation of a Spinal Surgical Instrument: A Numerical–Experimental Approach
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of a spinal surgical instrument a numerical experimental approach
topic single-use surgical instrument
cervical spine
in vitro test
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7078/5/2/26
work_keys_str_mv AT lucaciriello biomechanicalevaluationofaspinalsurgicalinstrumentanumericalexperimentalapproach
AT tomasovilla biomechanicalevaluationofaspinalsurgicalinstrumentanumericalexperimentalapproach