ONLINE vs. FACE-TO-FACE group coaching to promote teachers mental health: an exploratory field study in German teachers

IntroductionOnline formats provide promising and low-threshold options for mental health coaching. However, research on online mental health interventions compared to traditional face-to-face interventions remains scarce. In the present study, the established prevention tool “Teacher Group-coaching...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah S. Lütke Lanfer, Ruth Pfeifer, Yannik Rieder, Alexander Wünsch, Matthias Braeunig, Claas Lahmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Digital Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1479524/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832539875407036416
author Sarah S. Lütke Lanfer
Ruth Pfeifer
Yannik Rieder
Alexander Wünsch
Alexander Wünsch
Matthias Braeunig
Claas Lahmann
author_facet Sarah S. Lütke Lanfer
Ruth Pfeifer
Yannik Rieder
Alexander Wünsch
Alexander Wünsch
Matthias Braeunig
Claas Lahmann
author_sort Sarah S. Lütke Lanfer
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionOnline formats provide promising and low-threshold options for mental health coaching. However, research on online mental health interventions compared to traditional face-to-face interventions remains scarce. In the present study, the established prevention tool “Teacher Group-coaching Program” (TGP) was applied in both the original face-to-face setting as well as online. TGP focuses on promoting mental health in teachers by strengthening relational skills using the Balint group technique. This technique roots back to a psychoanalytic approach to explore the emotional aspects of (stress inducing) professional relationships. The current study aimed at comparing the satisfaction with and effectiveness of TGP between both settings.MethodThe sample consisted of 104 teachers who voluntarily chose between face-to-face (n = 51) and online (n = 53) setting. In a pre-posttest design, participants completed questionnaires before and after the intervention. Additionally participant's satisfaction with the program was assessed during and after TGP.ResultsIntervention effects did not differ significantly in terms of mental health, general life satisfaction and emotional distancing between TGP online and face-to-face. In line with previous research, there was a pre-posttest improvement for mental distress and the ability to distance oneself for both groups, which did not differ significantly between face-to-face and online setting. Satisfaction with the program was rated high in both settings, suggesting similar acceptance.DiscussionAlthough, the absence of an effect is not the evidence of equality of the groups, the present study highlights the potential of online admissions of mental health interventions as possible alternatives and additions to traditional face-to-face programs, especially when in-person meetings are not feasible. Specifically, it shows evidence that the Balint group technique can also be applied successfully by trained experts in the online setting.
format Article
id doaj-art-1e75aabd635e475f9d4a8da42c5c0973
institution Kabale University
issn 2673-253X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Digital Health
spelling doaj-art-1e75aabd635e475f9d4a8da42c5c09732025-02-05T07:32:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Digital Health2673-253X2025-02-01710.3389/fdgth.2025.14795241479524ONLINE vs. FACE-TO-FACE group coaching to promote teachers mental health: an exploratory field study in German teachersSarah S. Lütke Lanfer0Ruth Pfeifer1Yannik Rieder2Alexander Wünsch3Alexander Wünsch4Matthias Braeunig5Claas Lahmann6Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, GermanyDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, GermanyDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, GermanyDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, GermanyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, GermanyDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, GermanyIntroductionOnline formats provide promising and low-threshold options for mental health coaching. However, research on online mental health interventions compared to traditional face-to-face interventions remains scarce. In the present study, the established prevention tool “Teacher Group-coaching Program” (TGP) was applied in both the original face-to-face setting as well as online. TGP focuses on promoting mental health in teachers by strengthening relational skills using the Balint group technique. This technique roots back to a psychoanalytic approach to explore the emotional aspects of (stress inducing) professional relationships. The current study aimed at comparing the satisfaction with and effectiveness of TGP between both settings.MethodThe sample consisted of 104 teachers who voluntarily chose between face-to-face (n = 51) and online (n = 53) setting. In a pre-posttest design, participants completed questionnaires before and after the intervention. Additionally participant's satisfaction with the program was assessed during and after TGP.ResultsIntervention effects did not differ significantly in terms of mental health, general life satisfaction and emotional distancing between TGP online and face-to-face. In line with previous research, there was a pre-posttest improvement for mental distress and the ability to distance oneself for both groups, which did not differ significantly between face-to-face and online setting. Satisfaction with the program was rated high in both settings, suggesting similar acceptance.DiscussionAlthough, the absence of an effect is not the evidence of equality of the groups, the present study highlights the potential of online admissions of mental health interventions as possible alternatives and additions to traditional face-to-face programs, especially when in-person meetings are not feasible. Specifically, it shows evidence that the Balint group technique can also be applied successfully by trained experts in the online setting.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1479524/fullonlineteachermental healthpreventionface-to-facebalint technique
spellingShingle Sarah S. Lütke Lanfer
Ruth Pfeifer
Yannik Rieder
Alexander Wünsch
Alexander Wünsch
Matthias Braeunig
Claas Lahmann
ONLINE vs. FACE-TO-FACE group coaching to promote teachers mental health: an exploratory field study in German teachers
Frontiers in Digital Health
online
teacher
mental health
prevention
face-to-face
balint technique
title ONLINE vs. FACE-TO-FACE group coaching to promote teachers mental health: an exploratory field study in German teachers
title_full ONLINE vs. FACE-TO-FACE group coaching to promote teachers mental health: an exploratory field study in German teachers
title_fullStr ONLINE vs. FACE-TO-FACE group coaching to promote teachers mental health: an exploratory field study in German teachers
title_full_unstemmed ONLINE vs. FACE-TO-FACE group coaching to promote teachers mental health: an exploratory field study in German teachers
title_short ONLINE vs. FACE-TO-FACE group coaching to promote teachers mental health: an exploratory field study in German teachers
title_sort online vs face to face group coaching to promote teachers mental health an exploratory field study in german teachers
topic online
teacher
mental health
prevention
face-to-face
balint technique
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1479524/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahslutkelanfer onlinevsfacetofacegroupcoachingtopromoteteachersmentalhealthanexploratoryfieldstudyingermanteachers
AT ruthpfeifer onlinevsfacetofacegroupcoachingtopromoteteachersmentalhealthanexploratoryfieldstudyingermanteachers
AT yannikrieder onlinevsfacetofacegroupcoachingtopromoteteachersmentalhealthanexploratoryfieldstudyingermanteachers
AT alexanderwunsch onlinevsfacetofacegroupcoachingtopromoteteachersmentalhealthanexploratoryfieldstudyingermanteachers
AT alexanderwunsch onlinevsfacetofacegroupcoachingtopromoteteachersmentalhealthanexploratoryfieldstudyingermanteachers
AT matthiasbraeunig onlinevsfacetofacegroupcoachingtopromoteteachersmentalhealthanexploratoryfieldstudyingermanteachers
AT claaslahmann onlinevsfacetofacegroupcoachingtopromoteteachersmentalhealthanexploratoryfieldstudyingermanteachers